Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "taskgated".
2015 Sep 04
2
[cfe-dev] Running tests on OS X 10.10 vs "Killed: 9"
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Nico Weber via cfe-dev <
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> building 'check-all' on any of my machines running OS X 10.10 usually
>> fails because a few tests fail due to some processes being killed by the
2015 Sep 04
3
Running tests on OS X 10.10 vs "Killed: 9"
Hi,
building 'check-all' on any of my machines running OS X 10.10 usually fails
because a few tests fail due to some processes being killed by the kernel
(there's always "Killed: 9" somewhere in lit's error output). Everything's
fine on 10.9.
How do folks deal with this? Don't use 10.10 for building llvm? Is there
some tweakable to tell the kernel "please
2009 Oct 13
2
Mac R spinning wheel with Package Manager (PR#14005)
...+ 34 (in libSystem.B.dylib) [0x945f6012]
449 __pthread_start + 321 (in libSystem.B.dylib) [0x945f6155]
449 ??? [0x9580]
449 __vprocmgr_log_drain + 75 (in libSystem.B.dylib) [0x946ed9ce]
449 _mach_msg_trap + 10 (in libSystem.B.dylib) [0x945c5286]
Process: taskgated [39285]
Path: /usr/libexec/taskgated
ADDRESS BINARY
00001000 /usr/libexec/taskgated
Thread id: 10c69b58
User stack:
230 ??? [0x2066]
230 ??? [0x2364]
230 ??? [0x252b]
230 _mach_msg_overwrite_trap + 10 (in libSystem.B.dylib) [0x945c...