search for: targettyp

...in32/Path.inc in such way, that declaration of CopyFile will look like: void CopyFile(const sys::Path &Dest, const sys::Path &Src) { 2.3 X86 stuff Patch lib/Target/X86/X86SubTarget.cpp & X86JITInfo.cpp in such way: X86SubTarget.cpp: #if defined(__CYGWIN__) || defined(__MINGW32__) TargetType = isCygwin; #elif defined(__APPLE__) TargetType = isDarwin; #elif defined(_WIN32) TargetType = isWindows; #endif X86JITInfo.cpp: #if defined(__CYGWIN__) || defined(__APPLE__) || defined(__MINGW32__) ".globl _X86CompilationCallback\n" "_X86CompilationCallback:\n"...

...tinc-up #!/bin/sh ip=`uci get network.lan.ipaddr` ifconfig $INTERFACE $ip File contents of /etc/tinc/NETNAME/tinc-down #!/bin/sh ifconfig $INTERFACE down File contents of /etc/tinc/NETNAME/subnet-up #!/bin/sh [ $NODE = `uci get tinc.$NETNAME.Name` ] && exit case $SUBNET in */32) targetType=-host ;; *) targetType=-net ;; esac route add $targetType $SUBNET dev $INTERFACE File contents of /etc/tinc/NETNAME/subnet-down [ $NODE = `uci get tinc.$NETNAME.Name` ] && exit case $SUBNET in */32) targetType=-host ;; *) targetType=-net ;; esac route del $target...

...nk its fine to be somewhat subjective based on the reviewer that is more familiar with the code and APIs in question. > > I'd also like to update them so that > > > > llvm::Optional<std::pair<std::string, MatcherCtor>> > > getNodeConstructorType(ASTNodeKind targetType) { > > auto const &ctors = RegistryData->nodeConstructors(); > > auto it = llvm::find_if( > > ctors, [targetType](const NodeConstructorMap::value_type &ctor) { > > return ctor.first.isSame(targetType); > > }); > > if (it == ctors.e...

...as Optional is used more in the codebase, but also with objects which have a validity check such as isNone(), isValid(), isNull() or just `!= nullptr` etc. I'd also like to update them so that llvm::Optional<std::pair<std::string, MatcherCtor>> getNodeConstructorType(ASTNodeKind targetType) { auto const &ctors = RegistryData->nodeConstructors(); auto it = llvm::find_if( ctors, [targetType](const NodeConstructorMap::value_type &ctor) { return ctor.first.isSame(targetType); }); if (it == ctors.end()) return llvm::None; return it->s...

...tinc-up #!/bin/sh ip=`uci get network.lan.ipaddr` ifconfig $INTERFACE $ip File contents of /etc/tinc/NETNAME/tinc-down #!/bin/sh ifconfig $INTERFACE down File contents of /etc/tinc/NETNAME/subnet-up #!/bin/sh [ $NODE = `uci get tinc.$NETNAME.Name` ] && exit case $SUBNET in */32) targetType=-host ;; *) targetType=-net ;; esac route add $targetType $SUBNET dev $INTERFACE File contents of /etc/tinc/NETNAME/subnet-down [ $NODE = `uci get tinc.$NETNAME.Name` ] && exit case $SUBNET in */32) targetType=-host ;; *) targetType=-net ;; esac route del $target...

...de <sstream> -#include <string> -#include <vector> -#include <stdexcept> - -#include <pcre.h> - -#include "cpu.h" -#include "qmf/com/redhat/matahari/CPU.h" - -using namespace std; -namespace _qmf = qmf::com::redhat::matahari; - -template<typename targetType> targetType convert(const std::string& str) -{ - istringstream i(str); - targetType t; - if (!(i >> t)) - throw invalid_argument("Conversion failure for " + str); - return t; -} - -ostream& operator<<(ostream& output, const CPUWrapper& cp...

On Dec 16, 2018, at 11:44 AM, Stephen Kelly via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 25/11/2018 14:43, Stephen Kelly via llvm-dev wrote: >> However this is a proposal for more modern thinking regarding the permissiveness of auto in LLVM codebases. >> Currently the rule on the use of auto is here: > > Hi, > > Thanks for the input on this topic,

...7.000000000 -0700 > +++ /usr/local/src/R-2.0.0/src/main/dotcode.c 2005-05-11 > 12:24:11.000000000 -0700 > @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ > static void *RObjToCPtr(SEXP s, int naok, int dup, int narg, int Fort, > const char *name, R_toCConverter **converter, > int targetType) > { > + unsigned char *rawptr; > int *iptr; > float *sptr; > double *rptr; > @@ -228,6 +229,16 @@ > } > > switch(TYPEOF(s)) { > + case RAWSXP: > + n = LENGTH(s); > + rawptr = RAW(s); > + if (dup) { > + rawptr = (u...

...d CoUninitialize err:ole:CoUninitialize Mismatched CoUninitialize Unhandled Exception: System.Security.Principal.IdentityNotMappedException: Some or all identity references could not be translated. at System.Security.Principal.NTAccount.Translate(IdentityReferenceCollection sourceAccounts, Type targetType, Boolean forceSuccess) at System.Security.Principal.NTAccount.Translate(Type targetType) at System.Security.AccessControl.CommonObjectSecurity.ModifyAccess(AccessControlModification modification, AccessRule rule, Boolean& modified) at System.Security.AccessControl.CommonObjectSecurity...

...t(rnorm(100), geom="histogram")) pressed <<- FALSE return(TRUE) }) adddropsource(table) #, handler = defHandlerSource) #defHandlerSource = function(h,...) print("source") adddropmotion(g, handler=function(h, ...) { print("motion") }) adddroptarget(g, targetType="object", handler = defHandlerTarget, g) defHandlerTarget = function(h, ...){ print(h$dropdata) } ??????????????????????????????????????? Mark Heckmann Dipl. Wirt.-Ing. cand. Psych. Vorstra?e 93 B01 28359 Bremen Blog: www.markheckmann.de R-Blog: http://ryouready.wordpress.com

...NTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF + LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING + NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS + SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. +*/ + +TARGET speexdsp.lib +TARGETTYPE lib +UID 0 +MACRO HAVE_CONFIG_H +SOURCEPATH ..\libspeex +SOURCE buffer.c fftwrap.c filterbank.c +SOURCE jitter.c kiss_fft.c kiss_fftr.c +SOURCE mdf.c preprocess.c resample.c smallft.c +USERINCLUDE . ..\include\speex +SYSTEMINCLUDE \epoc32\incl...

...8 unsigned int MaxInlineSizeThreshold 128 unsigned int Is64Bit true bool HasLow4GUserAddress true bool TargetType isWindows llvm::X86Subtarget::<unnamed-tag> if (GlobalAddressSDNode *G = dyn_cast<GlobalAddressSDNode>(Callee)) { // We should use extra load for direct calls to dllimported functions in // non-JIT mode. // it get's into here if ((IsTailC...

.../src/cpu.cpp +++ b/src/cpu.cpp @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/* Copyright (C) 2009 Red Hat, Inc. +/* cpu.cpp - Copyright (C) 2009 Red Hat, Inc. * Written by Arjun Roy <arroy at redhat.com> * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify @@ -39,9 +39,9 @@ template<typename targetType> targetType convert(const std::string& str) if (!(i >> t)) throw invalid_argument("Conversion failure for " + str); return t; -} +} -ostream& operator<<(ostream& output, const CPUWrapper& cpu) +ostream& operator<<(ostream&am...

...ormation info_class SYSTEM_PROCESSOR_PERFORMANCE_INFORMATION Unhandled Exception: System.Security.Principal.IdentityNotMappedException: Some or all identity references could not be translated. at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.Translate(IdentityReferenceCollection sourceSids, Type targetType, Boolean forceSuccess) at System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier.Translate(Type targetType) at System.Security.Principal.WindowsIdentity.GetName() at System.Security.Principal.WindowsIdentity.get_Name() at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.ExceptionHandling.ExceptionFormatter...

On Feb 12, 2008, at 5:26 PM, Chuck Rose III wrote: > Hola LLVMers, > > I’m debugging through some strangeness that I’m seeing on X64 on > windows with LLVM2.2. I had to change the code so that it would > engage the x64 target machine on windows builds, but I’ve otherwise > left LLVM 2.2 alone. The basic idea is that I’ve got a function bar > which is compiled by

Hello, Everyone. This is just brief description on building llvm-gcc4 with mingw32. It's definitely non error-free and contains many "hacks", which should be eliminated in the future. 1. Prerequisites We're building in the folowing configuration: 1.1 GCC 3.4.5: gcc -v Reading specs from f:/research/mingw/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/3.4.5/specs Configured with:

Hola LLVMers, I'm debugging through some strangeness that I'm seeing on X64 on windows with LLVM2.2. I had to change the code so that it would engage the x64 target machine on windows builds, but I've otherwise left LLVM 2.2 alone. The basic idea is that I've got a function bar which is compiled by VStudio and I'm creating another function foo via LLVM JIT which is going