Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "targetptr".
2013 May 18
2
[LLVMdev] Unsupported MCJIT tests on ARM?
...passes, some not on { A9, A15 } x { Ubuntu 12.10, Ubuntu 12.04 },
the error is:
lli:
/home/user/devel/llvm/src/lib/ExecutionEngine/RuntimeDyld/RuntimeDyldELF.cpp:307:
void llvm::RuntimeDyldELF::resolveARMRelocation(const llvm::SectionEntry&,
uint64_t, uint32_t, uint32_t, int32_t): Assertion `(*TargetPtr &
0x000F0FFF) == 0' failed.
Stack dump:
0. Program arguments: /home/user/devel/llvm/build/bin//lli -use-mcjit
-remote-mcjit
/home/user/devel/llvm/src/test/ExecutionEngine/MCJIT/test-global-init-nonzero-remote.ll
Since the test is marked as XFAIL on ARM, I suspect this is expected, and
I...
2013 May 18
0
[LLVMdev] Unsupported MCJIT tests on ARM?
Hi Renato,
> /home/user/devel/llvm/src/lib/ExecutionEngine/RuntimeDyld/RuntimeDyldELF.cpp:307:
> void llvm::RuntimeDyldELF::resolveARMRelocation(const llvm::SectionEntry&,
> uint64_t, uint32_t, uint32_t, int32_t): Assertion `(*TargetPtr & 0x000F0FFF)
> == 0' failed.
I think there's a discussion going on about this already at
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.cvs/145699 (and
surrounding).
According to Amara that assertion was a bit of paranoia so we'd know
if someone tried emitting .rel reloca...
2013 Feb 15
4
[LLVMdev] MCJIT and Lazy Compilation
...that I don't see this as much of an issue, I was
just to
lazy to bother implementing it. I'll check this when I have some further
free time.
FYI this is all under x86. I did try to run under ARM but bombed out on an
assertion error
in the ARM ELF relocation code - specifically assert((*TargetPtr &
0x000F0FFF) == 0);
I assume this is a result of something evil that I have done but I haven't
yet had time to
investigate any further. Again I'll let you know when I have some more
time.
Just a quick heads up but In general my initial thoughts are that MCJIT is
really not
that far o...
2013 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] MCJIT and Lazy Compilation
...that I don't see this as much of an issue, I was just to
lazy to bother implementing it. I'll check this when I have some further free time.
FYI this is all under x86. I did try to run under ARM but bombed out on an assertion error
in the ARM ELF relocation code - specifically assert((*TargetPtr & 0x000F0FFF) == 0);
I assume this is a result of something evil that I have done but I haven't yet had time to
investigate any further. Again I'll let you know when I have some more time.
Just a quick heads up but In general my initial thoughts are that MCJIT is really not
that far o...
2013 Feb 16
2
[LLVMdev] MCJIT and Lazy Compilation
...;
> lazy to bother implementing it. I'll check this when I have some further
> free time.****
>
> ** **
>
> FYI this is all under x86. I did try to run under ARM but bombed out on
> an assertion error ****
>
> in the ARM ELF relocation code - specifically assert((*TargetPtr &
> 0x000F0FFF) == 0);****
>
> I assume this is a result of something evil that I have done but I haven't
> yet had time to ****
>
> investigate any further. Again I'll let you know when I have some more
> time.****
>
> ** **
>
> Just a quick heads up b...
2013 Feb 07
0
[LLVMdev] MCJIT and Lazy Compilation
That's awesome!
I think at this point having people try out various approaches and seeing what works and what doesn't is our biggest need in this area. Please do keep me informed about what you find out.
-Andy
From: Andrew Sorensen [mailto:digegoo at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 4:33 PM
To: Kaylor, Andrew
Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] MCJIT and Lazy
2013 Mar 09
0
[LLVMdev] MCJIT and Lazy Compilation
...ng it. I'll check this when I have some further
>> free time.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> FYI this is all under x86. I did try to run under ARM but bombed out on
>> an assertion error ****
>>
>> in the ARM ELF relocation code - specifically assert((*TargetPtr &
>> 0x000F0FFF) == 0);****
>>
>> I assume this is a result of something evil that I have done but I
>> haven't yet had time to ****
>>
>> investigate any further. Again I'll let you know when I have some more
>> time.****
>>
>> **...
2013 Feb 07
3
[LLVMdev] MCJIT and Lazy Compilation
Thanks for the update Andy.
I'm very happy to be involved in anyway that is helpful. If you would like
me to test ideas, or contribute to further discussions, then please let me
know.
I currently have extempore running nicely with MCJIT for the "monolithic"
case and am working on various LLVM hacks to better understand the issues
involved with non-monolithic approaches - in