search for: target_st

.../* *************** *** 235,241 **** --- 236,261 ---- if (make_backups && !make_backup(fname)) return; + /* if the target has been modified since the file list was generated, + just delete the tmp file, leaving the target behind. */ + + if(update_only) { + STRUCT_STAT target_st; + + ret = do_stat(fname, &target_st); + + if(ret == 0) { + if(cmp_modtime(target_st.st_mtime, file->modtime) > 0) { + rprintf(FINFO, "target \"%s\" newer, deleting \"%s\"\n", + fname, fnametmp); + do_unlink(fnametmp); + return;...

...event, then don't try to enter halt.? (I hope this is the right direction as Peter mentioned in another email) --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c @@ -210,6 +210,13 @@ int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, struct cpuidle_driver *drv, ??????????????? target_state = &drv->states[index]; ??????? } +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT +?????? paravirt_idle_poll(); + +?????? if (need_resched()) +?????????????? return -EBUSY; +#endif + ??????? /* Take note of the planned idle state. */ ??????? sched_idle_set_state(target_state); thanks, Quan Alibaba Cloud

On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 06:06:02PM +0800, Quan Xu wrote: > > From: Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz at gmail.com> > > > > Implement a generic idle poll which resembles the functionality > > found in arch/. Provide weak arch_cpu_idle_poll function which > > can be overridden by the architecture code if needed. > >

On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 06:06:02PM +0800, Quan Xu wrote: > > From: Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz at gmail.com> > > > > Implement a generic idle poll which resembles the functionality > > found in arch/. Provide weak arch_cpu_idle_poll function which > > can be overridden by the architecture code if needed. > >

On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, Quan Xu wrote: > On 2017-11-16 06:03, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c > @@ -210,6 +210,13 @@ int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, > struct cpuidle_driver *drv, > ??????????????? target_state = &drv->states[index]; > ??????? } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT > +?????? paravirt_idle_poll(); > + > +?????? if (need_resched()) > +?????????????? return -EBUSY; > +#endif That's just plain wrong. We don't want to see any of this PARAVIRT crap in anything...

...017, Quan Xu wrote: >> On 2017-11-16 06:03, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c >> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c >> @@ -210,6 +210,13 @@ int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, >> struct cpuidle_driver *drv, >> ??????????????? target_state = &drv->states[index]; >> ??????? } >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT >> +?????? paravirt_idle_poll(); >> + >> +?????? if (need_resched()) >> +?????????????? return -EBUSY; >> +#endif > That's just plain wrong. We don't want to see a...

...017, Quan Xu wrote: >> On 2017-11-16 06:03, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c >> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c >> @@ -210,6 +210,13 @@ int cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev, >> struct cpuidle_driver *drv, >> ??????????????? target_state = &drv->states[index]; >> ??????? } >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT >> +?????? paravirt_idle_poll(); >> + >> +?????? if (need_resched()) >> +?????????????? return -EBUSY; >> +#endif > That's just plain wrong. We don't want to see a...

This patch set is a follow up to "Add a vhost RPMsg API" [1], it is marked as an RFC because firstly it depends on the RPMsg API series and secondly it is currently being reviewed on ALSA and SOF mailing lists, but any early comments from virtualisation developers would be highly appreciated too! Thanks Guennadi [1]

This patch set is a follow up to "Add a vhost RPMsg API" [1], it is marked as an RFC because firstly it depends on the RPMsg API series and secondly it is currently being reviewed on ALSA and SOF mailing lists, but any early comments from virtualisation developers would be highly appreciated too! Thanks Guennadi [1]