search for: targer

Hey, why i am getting this error ? dsync(user at example.com): Error: Can't rename mailbox VoIP_08300a224c41694c0d0f000020ce4ec5 to VoIP: Target mailbox already exists It happens when i run dsync twice, but it should do only changes right ? dovecot 2.0 I am traying to convert all my user mboc to maildir so i made an script to help. The enveriment: Have dovecot looking into file conf and

...everyone, I'm trying to compile my test.cpp for ARC, using this guide https://clang.llvm.org/docs/CrossCompilation.html. I've built my LLVM+CLANG with ARC, ARM and X86. clang -target arc -S test.cpp Gives me: error: unknown target triple 'arc', please use -triple or -arch clang -targer arm works fine Is there any way to compile for ARC? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180927/f5302aa5/attachment.html>

Hi John, What targer are you trying to compile this for? I imagine this is just a case of using an X86 intrinsic on a non-X86 back end. Or is this an intrinsic you added and didn't provide a selection pattern for? In any case, this intrinsic makes it into the selection DAG and the instruction selector tries to sel...

...=0.00 > per second: migr=0.00 > * //Events are some syscalls or some user-defined functions. > > In a word, this program looks very like the mpstat. > > One of my testcases is running this program with dtrace''s fasttrap > provider, such as: > dtrace -n ''pid$targer::callee:entry{ ... }'' -c my_program > dtrace -n ''test$target:::callee{ ... }'' -c my_program > > The output is very strange. > *30.00 secs, 213099.33 per secs > user=99.6749%, kernel=0.3251%, idle=0.0000% > per second: intr=513.15, ithr=312.13, syscall=48...

...ke -mcpu=haswell or -mattr=bmi2 to enable support for the intrinsic. It seems to -mcpu=native doesn't work for lli so it can't just autodetect your CPU. ~Craig On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:54 AM, Nemanja Ivanovic via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi John, > What targer are you trying to compile this for? I imagine this is just a > case of using an X86 intrinsic on a non-X86 back end. Or is this an > intrinsic you added and didn't provide a selection pattern for? > > In any case, this intrinsic makes it into the selection DAG and the > instructi...

Hello, I’m not sure if this is the right place to ask beginner questions. If not, please direct me to the appropriate place. I’m writing my first llvm program and I’m trying to call an intrinsic, but failing. So far this is what I have: declare ccc i32 @llvm.x86.bmi.pdep.32(i32, i32) @.str2 = private unnamed_addr constant [4 x i8] c"%d\0A\00", align 1 declare i32 @printf(i8*, ...)

...Do you really want to drop your batch of pages on each invocation? Doesn't that remove them very quickly? Just try to dd if=large_file of=/dev/null and see how your pages are disappearing. Shrinkers usually scale the number of objects they are going to reclaim based on the memory pressure (aka targer to be reclaimed). -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs

Hello all, I got some severe iscsi connection loss on my dom0 (Gentoo 2.6.20-xen-r6, xen 3.1.1). Happening several times a day. open-iscsi version is 2.0.865.12. Target iscsi is the open-e DSS product. Here is a snip of my messages log file: May 5 16:52:50 ying connection226:0: iscsi: detected conn error (1011) May 5 16:52:51 ying iscsid: connect failed (111) May 5 16:52:51 ying iscsid:

...linux specific, including names and relocation type > information. What happens when compiling on or for other platforms? Please see the darwin tests in the latest patch. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Add-a-finishParse-callback-to-the-targer-asm-parser.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1585 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131217/48eb4e06/attachment.obj> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0002-Implement-the-ldr-pseudo-o...

...g and schedule it much earlier in the mid-end. X86 & SystemZ would simply request no expansion happen. This means Clang could still emit cmpxchg and atomicrmw, which closely match C & C++ semantics, but most of LLVM would see the control-flow and operations in a form much closer to how the targers will actually emit them. In addition, other languages would be able to provide more general atomic operations, if they want (slightly more complex bit twiddling seems like it could be particularly useful in some algorithms). Current atomic instructions cover (most of) C and C++, but nothing else....

...These tests are very linux specific, including names and relocation type >> information. What happens when compiling on or for other platforms? > > Please see the darwin tests in the latest patch. Will do, and thanks again. -Jim > > <0001-Add-a-finishParse-callback-to-the-targer-asm-parser.patch><0002-Implement-the-ldr-pseudo-opcode-for-ARM-assembly.patch><0003-Implement-the-.ltorg-directive-for-ARM-assembly.patch><squashed.patch>

Hello, I've got a problem with a PHP script, in which I call the system function (to call another processes). The call is : system("R --slave --vanilla < path/to/source/source.R"); if in this R file, I've got the lines: pdf(file="/path/to/file/file.pdf") commands dev.off() the pdf file is perfectly created but if I change the lines to:

Hi David, Maybe I’m just blind, but where’s the code to handle the .ltorg directive? Is that a separate patch, maybe? Without that, this is not going to be usable in any circumstance using subsections-via-symbols. +typedef std::map<const MCSection *, ConstantPool> ConstantPoolMapTy; This feels odd to me. Can you elaborate a bit more on the data structure choices?? I would have expected

Moving discussion to llvm-commits now that I have a more developed implementation: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20131111/195401. html > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On > Behalf Of David Peixotto > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 11:09 AM > To: 'Amara Emerson' >

On Wed 01-08-18 19:12:25, Wei Wang wrote: > On 07/30/2018 05:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 27-07-18 17:24:55, Wei Wang wrote: > > > The OOM notifier is getting deprecated to use for the reasons mentioned > > > here by Michal Hocko: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/12/314 > > > > > > This patch replaces the virtio-balloon oom notifier with a

On Wed 01-08-18 19:12:25, Wei Wang wrote: > On 07/30/2018 05:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 27-07-18 17:24:55, Wei Wang wrote: > > > The OOM notifier is getting deprecated to use for the reasons mentioned > > > here by Michal Hocko: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/12/314 > > > > > > This patch replaces the virtio-balloon oom notifier with a