Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "tapdev1".
Did you mean:
tapdev
2010 Sep 20
1
Xen 4.0.1, tap vs tap2, blktap2 documentation, and gentoo-xen-kernel problem
...t work to minimize upgrade efforts.
http://lxr.xensource.com/lxr/source/tools/blktap2/README also still
mention tap:tapdisk, and not tap2:tapdisk.
Second problem, using that combination, blktap2 devices was not
cleanly freed. /sys/class/blktap2/devices and tapdisk devices keep
increasing (tapdev0, tapdev1, etc.). The strange thing is, when using
Xen 4.0.1 hypervisor but with Xen 4.0.0 userland, tap:tapdisk and
blktap2 device cleanup works as expected.
--
Fajar
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
2012 Oct 27
8
RFH: loopback & blktap(2) and CDROM
Hello,
I''m currently trying to understand some problems I had in the past with mixing
look-back with blktap(2) for HV and PV domains. I''m stuck reading the source
code, so I''d like to get some help from the list. Interrupt me if I got
something fundamentally wrong in my understanding so far:
1. With pure-HV the domU gets an emulated IDE (or whatever) disk. The
2012 May 23
2
Bug#674088: xcp-xapi: vbd-plug to dom0 does not creates /dev/xvd* devices in dom0
...3 04:23:29.252379 tap.activate: Launched Tapdisk(vhd:/mnt/c95af56f-799f-49ad-a64f-82eca3299b50.vhd, pid=12901, minor=1, state=R)
[12866] 2012-05-23 04:23:29.252704 DeviceNode(/dev/sm/backend/42cbc4a3-dae2-e756-d122-01b87ed871c2/c95af56f-799f-49ad-a64f-82eca3299b50) -> /dev/xen/blktap-2/tapdev1
[12866] 2012-05-23 04:23:29.253008 lock: released /var/lock/sm/c95af56f-799f-49ad-a64f-82eca3299b50/vdi
[12866] 2012-05-23 04:23:29.253116 lock: closed /var/lock/sm/c95af56f-799f-49ad-a64f-82eca3299b50/vdi
[12866] 2012-05-23 04:23:29.253281 lock: closed /var/lock/sm/42cbc4a3-dae2-e75...