search for: tap_reserv

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "tap_reserv".

Did you mean: tap_reserve
2018 Sep 06
1
[PATCH net-next 08/11] tun: switch to new type of msg_control
...(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/tap.c b/drivers/net/tap.c > index f0f7cd977667..7996ed7cbf18 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/tap.c > +++ b/drivers/net/tap.c > @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ static inline struct sk_buff *tap_alloc_skb(struct sock *sk, size_t prepad, > #define TAP_RESERVE HH_DATA_OFF(ETH_HLEN) > > /* Get packet from user space buffer */ > -static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, struct msghdr *m, > +static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, void *msg_control, > struct iov_iter *from, int noblock) > { > int good_lin...
2023 Feb 21
1
[patch net-next] net: virtio_net: implement exact header length guest feature
...fine ... > Well yeah. But tap does not do that, does it? it uses hdr_len directly. tap_get_user() limit the head length: static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, void *msg_control, ??????????????????????????? struct iov_iter *from, int noblock) { ?? ?int good_linear = SKB_MAX_HEAD(TAP_RESERVE); ... > > >>> I will add this to the patch description and send v2. >>> >> I feel this does not answer the question yet, or maybe I am being dense. >> My point was not about making hdr_len precise. My point was that we are >> making a change here for no...
2018 Sep 06
0
[PATCH net-next 08/11] tun: switch to new type of msg_control
...+++ 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/tap.c b/drivers/net/tap.c index f0f7cd977667..7996ed7cbf18 100644 --- a/drivers/net/tap.c +++ b/drivers/net/tap.c @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ static inline struct sk_buff *tap_alloc_skb(struct sock *sk, size_t prepad, #define TAP_RESERVE HH_DATA_OFF(ETH_HLEN) /* Get packet from user space buffer */ -static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, struct msghdr *m, +static ssize_t tap_get_user(struct tap_queue *q, void *msg_control, struct iov_iter *from, int noblock) { int good_linear = SKB_MAX_HEAD(TAP_RESERVE); @@...
2018 Sep 06
22
[PATCH net-next 00/11] Vhost_net TX batching
Hi all: This series tries to batch submitting packets to underlayer socket through msg_control during sendmsg(). This is done by: 1) Doing userspace copy inside vhost_net 2) Build XDP buff 3) Batch at most 64 (VHOST_NET_BATCH) XDP buffs and submit them once through msg_control during sendmsg(). 4) Underlayer sockets can use XDP buffs directly when XDP is enalbed, or build skb based on XDP
2023 Feb 20
2
[patch net-next] net: virtio_net: implement exact header length guest feature
Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 01:55:33PM CET, mst at redhat.com wrote: >On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 09:35:00AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 02:47:36PM CET, mst at redhat.com wrote: >> >On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 01:53:55PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> >> Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 01:22:01PM CET, mst at redhat.com wrote: >> >> >On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at
2018 Sep 12
14
[PATCH net-next V2 00/11] vhost_net TX batching
Hi all: This series tries to batch submitting packets to underlayer socket through msg_control during sendmsg(). This is done by: 1) Doing userspace copy inside vhost_net 2) Build XDP buff 3) Batch at most 64 (VHOST_NET_BATCH) XDP buffs and submit them once through msg_control during sendmsg(). 4) Underlayer sockets can use XDP buffs directly when XDP is enalbed, or build skb based on XDP
2018 Sep 12
14
[PATCH net-next V2 00/11] vhost_net TX batching
Hi all: This series tries to batch submitting packets to underlayer socket through msg_control during sendmsg(). This is done by: 1) Doing userspace copy inside vhost_net 2) Build XDP buff 3) Batch at most 64 (VHOST_NET_BATCH) XDP buffs and submit them once through msg_control during sendmsg(). 4) Underlayer sockets can use XDP buffs directly when XDP is enalbed, or build skb based on XDP