search for: tanu

From: Tanu Kaskinen <tanu.kaskinen at linux.intel.com> Not everyone who includes speexdsp_config_types.h will have a test which defines those, and if we've chosen to use the stdint types at configure time then we know exactly which header(s) are available, so just choose the best one then and gener...

On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > > I have a doubt. > > This is an excerpt of the raw report I get after running Spec benchmarks > through llvm-test.I am trying to calculate the program execution > time.Does the output result in bold corresponds to "lli time" in > Makefile.spec ? I...

...vm.bc TEST-RESULT-nat-time: program 2.870000 TEST-PASS: llc /External/SPEC/CFP2000/177.mesa/177.mesa TEST-RESULT-llc: Total Execution Time: 12.9200 seconds (12.9080 wall clock) TEST-RESULT-llc-time: program 5.040000 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks Tanu __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/2005090...

...enerate a .bc file like this and then run my pass over it like this : opt -load /home/llvm-cvs/llvm/Debug/lib/LLVMHello.so -hello <helloprog.bc> class_prog.bc Will the new .bc file (class_prog.bc) be also without optimizations ?opt also does some optimizations.Can I control them ? Thanks Tanu Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > I wish to compile without optimizations ( the option being turned off ) > but still generate bytecode file. > > Options -S , -c removes optimizations but I also...

...o compile without optimizations ( the option being turned off ) but still generate bytecode file. Options -S , -c removes optimizations but I also need .bc file to experiment and use further. How should I do it? Thanks -TS Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > I got very useful replies from dev list regarding my earlier question > but yet not able to determine block size. That I want in total size of a > block in a function in bytes and not just the number of > instructions.LLVM Tool gives most of the information e.g funct...

On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Tanu Sharma wrote: > I have trouble using the llvm tools.Some of the errors are : > > $ llvm-dis prog.bc > $ llvm-dis: Invalid Top Level Block Length! Type:1, Size:456 (Vers=0, Pos=12) Can you explain how you generated this bytecode file? It looks corrupted or something. Also, can you se...

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > I wish to compile without optimizations ( the option being turned off ) > but still generate bytecode file. > > Options -S , -c removes optimizations but I also need .bc file to > experiment and use further. Passing "-Wa,-disab...

This is exactly what i m trying : opt -load /home/tsharma/ankur/llvm/Debug/lib/LLVMHello.so -hello <helloprog.bc> /dev/null Tanu Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > I wrote a pass which randomizes basic blocks and insert new block.But > when i run another pass over it which simply lists all basic blocks I > don't get to see the changes.The bytecode file...

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > I created a new block and inserted it into the present basic block list > , but I get this error: > > opt: BasicBlock.cpp:83: virtual llvm::BasicBlock::~BasicBlock(): Assertion `getParent() == 0 && "BasicBlock still linked into the program!"' faile...

...entry��$^M^@^@^B^Y^Nstruct..TorRec^Y^Mstruct.TorRecB^O^A^F.str_2^B^F.str_3^A^R^A^Fprintf^A^U^A^Dexit^A^W^A^Dmain^A^M^A^F.str_1^A^Q^A^OInitialized.0__������ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I generated it like this: $llvmgcc prog.c -o prog Thanks Tanu Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Tanu Sharma wrote: > I have trouble using the llvm tools.Some of the errors are : > > $ llvm-dis prog.bc > $ llvm-dis: Invalid Top Level Block Length! Type:1, Size:456 (Vers=0, Pos=12) Can you explain how you gener...

Tanu Sharma wrote: > Hello, > > In an attempt to randomise the basic blocks in a function, is it > possible that I can randomise the entry block as well? And maybe insert > some instructions in the pass to call entry block while running the > program ? > > Is it feasible? &g...

...ing or removing node ...I am trying to insert a "new" entry node in an existing list. In another reply I understood (also mentioned on the site) that no other block can branch to the entry block. How do I achieve this ? Is it feasible?Let me know if there is any example. Thanks again, Tanu Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > I created a new block and inserted it into the present basic block list > , but I get this error: > > opt: BasicBlock.cpp:83: virtual llvm::BasicBlock::~BasicBlock(): Assertion `getParent() == 0...

I would try that ..Thanks Another thing that I want to do is to randomize functions within a program (or file ), whatever is easier to do in llvm .Also please tell me how can I randomize global variables ? Thanks TS Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: On Mon, 30 May 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > I have been trying to compile the SPEC benchmark but have failed even > after several attempts.The first error I get while trying to run is : There are two ways to do this: 1. Use the llvm-test harness 2. Use the official spec harness with -Wl,-native-cbe or -Wl,-native fl...

FTR, my main concern with this kind of approach is the case where your platform has two compilers, only one of which has stdint.h Jean-Marc On 07/05/2015 11:10 AM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > From: Tanu Kaskinen <tanu.kaskinen at linux.intel.com> > > Not everyone who includes speexdsp_config_types.h will have a test > which defines those, and if we've chosen to use the stdint types at > configure time then we know exactly which header(s) are a...

On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 22:34 -0600, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > > > Thanks for the reply :-) > > I am actually looking for ways to determine "size" of code segment when the program is in native code. > > Any suggestions to do that ? > > Compile it with llvm to a native .o or .exe file, then run 'size...

...and increasing the counter for each basic block for each function.but for some reason , I m getting different number everytime !! Is Statistic is the right way to do it ? - Average basic block size in a program ( in bytes) Any suggestions to make it simple and get an accurate result? Regards, Tanu Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > There is tool that calculates execution count and total number of blocks > , is there anything available to detemine size of basic blocks in a > program in bytes? Are you talking about native co...

...list , but I get this error: opt: BasicBlock.cpp:83: virtual llvm::BasicBlock::~BasicBlock(): Assertion `getParent() == 0 && "BasicBlock still linked into the program!"' failed. The program completes its task and i get this in the end. I am unable to resolve this. Thanks Tanu John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: Tanu Sharma wrote: > Hello, > > In an attempt to randomise the basic blocks in a function, is it > possible that I can randomise the entry block as well? And maybe insert > some instructions in the pass to call entry block whil...

Thanks for the reply :-) I am actually looking for ways to determine "size" of code segment when the program is in native code. Any suggestions to do that ? Tanu Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > > Hey, > > I have written a pass and wishes to measure its performance overhead > after running it over a program.I also wish to measure the size of code > segment once the program is in...

...eful replies from dev list regarding my earlier question but yet not able to determine block size. That I want in total size of a block in a function in bytes and not just the number of instructions.LLVM Tool gives most of the information e.g function bytes etc....but not individual block. Thanks Tanu Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > Actually I started with hello.cpp povided as an example pass and > modified and made my pass which does randomization. I have been working > on it and running over programs and it always worked f...

On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > I have been trying to randomize blocks in a program and modified > "BasicBlockPlacement.cpp" for the purpose but getting segmentation > fault.I am not able to determine the problem.Can anyone please decrypt > these error messages or suggest what might be th...