search for: tanger

Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "tanger".

Did you mean: danger
2007 Aug 19
2
[LLVMdev] Tool support for generation of transactional code
I would like to announce the availability of compiler support for generation of transactional code in LLVM IR. Our tool is called Tanger and it is an LLVM pass. You can download Tanger at: http://tinystm.org Transactional memory (TM) is viewed by a lot of people to be an important tool for enabling parallelism in a wide area of applications, and especially for developers that are not skilled in concurrent programming. It is a lo...
2007 Aug 19
0
[LLVMdev] Tool support for generation of transactional code
...mance numbers for them somewhere? Thanks, --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.org On Aug 19, 2007, at 3:22 PM, Torvald Riegel wrote: > I would like to announce the availability of compiler support for > generation > of transactional code in LLVM IR. Our tool is called Tanger and it > is an LLVM > pass. You can download Tanger at: http://tinystm.org > > Transactional memory (TM) is viewed by a lot of people to be an > important tool > for enabling parallelism in a wide area of applications, and > especially for > developers that are not ski...
2008 Apr 22
1
[LLVMdev] Google Summer of Code Projects
First of all, I'd like to thank the entire LLVM team for this opportunity. Torvald, google only displays the abstract on the results page, but I do know about Tanger and it was mentioned in both the proposal and the comments that followed, I'll write an email to you later with that info in a bit, and I do intend to use as much available infrastructure as possible, and tanger/tinystm are certainly going to be of great interest to the project. I'm kind o...
2008 Apr 22
0
[LLVMdev] Google Summer of Code Projects
...project's abstract states, there are open C/C++ based implementations for compiler support for memory transactions. Besides some efforts to modify GCC (AFAIK the respective groups haven't published source code yet), there is also an open-source tool that is implemented as an LLVM pass (Tanger, see http://tinystm.org/tanger). I'm part of a group that does research on transactional memory. We are working on many aspects of (S)TM (STM algorithms and implementations, compiler support, infrastructure, ...) and collaborate with several other research groups. For example, I have worked...
2008 Apr 22
2
[LLVMdev] Google Summer of Code Projects
I'm happy to say that LLVM has 6 projects approved for Google SoC this year (3x more than last year!): [vmkit] "Generics support for N3" by Tilmann Schelle [clang] "Adding support for C++ classes in clang" by Argiris Kirtzidis [codegen] "PSP (Playstation Portable) support into LLVM Mips backend" by Bruno Cardoso Lopes [llvmir]
2004 Jul 22
1
Cannot delete used folders?
...else is fine, renamable, deletable. Regular files are not a problem at all. Trying to delete complains with a "Zugriffsverletzung" (Access violation?). Fiddling with locking=no or oplocks=no did not help. I'm stuck here - can someone give me a hint or pointer? Thanks a lot Volker Tanger ITK Security
2008 Apr 19
1
[LLVMdev] CodeGen fails for CallInst with label
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > It sounds like you're doing something STM like, have you contacted > Torvald to see if he has ideas or insight? > http://llvm.org/pubs/2008-02-23-TRANSACT-TangerObjBased.html Yeah, this is TM-like with the begin/end/abort+rollback. Thanks for the pointer, but it seems like Tanger's implementation doesn't support explicit aborts probably "Because our txns never abort." So there wasn't a need to give a label to tanger_begin() to lead to...
2011 Jun 23
1
split dataframe by sample()
Hi, I seemingly have a simple problem, but I've spend hours reading guides & posts on this forum and I can't seem to piece together what I need. I have a dataframe where I want to divide it into two subsets: a sample, and the remainder of the dataframe in a new frame. I've tried this: split(df, sample(nrow(df), size=100, replace=FALSE)) another way would be to make a new
2008 Apr 24
1
about the parameter of plc_tuning.
hi,i have two questions. 1. i dont know how to use the parameter of plc_tuning, in 20% packets loss net condition what value it set? 2. one (A) use 16.8K (quality = 5) ,the other (B) use 20.6k (quality = 6) . i find A sound with clutter. why? please help me. thanks! ___________________________________________________________ ???????????? http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/
2008 May 07
0
how i can use agc function
...st->agc_enabled = 1; st->agc_level = 8000; I feel the agc function not work,how can i enhance the volume. 2. I test encode with 16.8K WB mode and decode with 23.8 WB mode, and find voice not good! with continues electric current sound . why? please help me. thanks a lot. tanger. --------------------------------- ???????????? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20080507/05560a40/attachment.htm
2008 Nov 29
0
need package telecommunication
Helo, I'm looking for package and database concerning egalisation in telecommunication. Please can you help me to find it on R. Thank you for your help. -- Fatima-Zahra ELGHAZOULI Elève Ingénieur GSTR5 ENSA Tanger ----- www.ensat.ac.ma [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2008 Apr 19
0
[LLVMdev] CodeGen fails for CallInst with label
...se it violates the CFG. > So if I *don't* violate the CFG, would I still need to do something > close to "big and nasty"? It sounds like you're doing something STM like, have you contacted Torvald to see if he has ideas or insight? http://llvm.org/pubs/2008-02-23-TRANSACT-TangerObjBased.html -Chris > ; save the address of %otherPath to use later > call @llvm.checkpoint(label %otherPath) > ; trick the rest of the compiler to think data flows to both paths > *from here* > br i1 @opaqueButAlwaysTrue, label %normalPath, label %otherPath > > normalP...
2008 Apr 19
2
[LLVMdev] CodeGen fails for CallInst with label
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > No. The reason we don't allow this is because it violates the CFG. So if I *don't* violate the CFG, would I still need to do something close to "big and nasty"? ; save the address of %otherPath to use later call @llvm.checkpoint(label %otherPath) ; trick the rest of the compiler to
2010 Jul 15
3
Speex Echo Cancellation
> Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:19:43 -0600 > From: devi at purpletalk.com > Subject: [Speex-dev] Speex Echo Cancellation > To: speex-dev at xiph.org > Message-ID: <20100715001943.pr04hvtxsc8k04so at mail.purpletalk.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; > format="flowed" > > Hi > > I am using speex
2004 Aug 26
5
3.0.6 and pam_winbind problems (sernet)?
Recently I upgraded a server from samba 3.0.2a to 3.0.6, and now apache won't authenticate properly with pam_winbind. Winbind's been restarted, apache has been restarted, for grins I even rebooted the server. >From /var/log/messages: Aug 26 10:24:51 linps2 pam_winbind[654]: user 'jarboed' granted acces >From apache's error log: [Thu Aug 26 10:24:51 2004] [error] (2)No