search for: tamis

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 28 matches for "tamis".

Did you mean: amis
2018 Jan 31
4
df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4
Nithya, I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is there any way we could possibly resolve it today? Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 11:26 AM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at ornl.gov>, "gluster-users at
2018 Jan 31
0
df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4
Hi Eva, I'm sorry but I need to get in touch with another developer to check about the changes here and he will be available only tomorrow. Is there someone else I could work with while you are away? Regards, Nithya On 31 January 2018 at 22:00, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > Nithya, > > > > I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is
2018 Jan 31
3
df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4
Amar, Thanks for your prompt reply. No, I do not plan to fix the code and re-compile. I was hoping it could be fixed with setting the shared-brick-count or some other option. Since this is a production system, we will wait until a fix is in a release. Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 12:15 PM To: Eva Freer
2018 Feb 01
0
df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4
Hi, I think we have a workaround for until we have a fix in the code. The following worked on my system. Copy the attached file to */usr/lib*/glusterfs/**3.12.4**/filter/*. (You might need to create the *filter* directory in this path.) Make sure the file has execute permissions. On my system: [root at rhgsserver1 fuse2]# cd /usr/lib/glusterfs/3.12.5/ [root at rhgsserver1 3.12.5]# l total 4.0K
2018 Jan 31
0
df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4
Hi Freer, Our analysis is that this issue is caused by https://review.gluster.org/17618. Specifically, in 'gd_set_shared_brick_count()' from https://review.gluster.org/#/c/17618/9/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-utils.c . But even if we fix it today, I don't think we have a release planned immediately for shipping this. Are you planning to fix the code and re-compile? Regards,
2010 May 12
3
[LLVMdev] would like to contribute
Hello everyone! I'm new to open-source in general and to LLVM in particular. I'd like to contribute and was thinking of starting from http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5639 What the next step should be? Should I register somewhere? Thanks, Tami -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2018 Jan 31
2
df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4
The values for shared-brick-count are still the same. I did not re-start the volume after setting the cluster.min-free-inodes to 6%. Do I need to restart it? Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 11:14 AM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at
2006 Feb 17
2
Packet vanishes after mangle-prerouting.
Can anyone tell me whether I have a routing problem, or an openVPN problem, or something else? I''ve stared at this for so long I think I must be looking in the wrong place! I have 3 machines: Machine A has single ethernet card, eth0, 192.168.5.5 Machine B has eth0, 192.168.5.? on the local net, eth1, 81.2.x.y to the internet, and
2018 Jan 31
0
df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4
On 31 January 2018 at 21:50, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > The values for shared-brick-count are still the same. I did not re-start > the volume after setting the cluster.min-free-inodes to 6%. Do I need to > restart it? > > > That is not necessary. Let me get back to you on this tomorrow. Regards, Nithya > Thanks, > > Eva (865) 574-6894
2018 Jan 31
2
df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4
Nithya, Responding to an earlier question: Before the upgrade, we were at 3.103 on these servers, but some of the clients were 3.7.6. From below, does this mean that ?shared-brick-count? needs to be set to 1 for all bricks. All of the bricks are on separate xfs partitions composed hardware of RAID 6 volumes. LVM is not used. The current setting for cluster.min-free-inodes was 5%. I changed it to
2018 Jan 31
0
df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4
On 31 January 2018 at 21:34, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > Nithya, > > > > Responding to an earlier question: Before the upgrade, we were at 3.103 on > these servers, but some of the clients were 3.7.6. From below, does this > mean that ?shared-brick-count? needs to be set to 1 for all bricks. > > > > All of the bricks are on separate xfs
2004 Nov 15
3
source policy routing going to wrong path
Hi, Below is my Linux firewall network configuration: - eth0 - isp 1, IP: 1.1.1.10, Netmask: 255.255.255.252 eth1 - isp 2, IP: 2.2.2.10, Netmask: 255.255.255.252 eth2 - lan, IP: 172.16.0.254, Netmask: 255.255.255.0 eth3 - dmz, 192.168.0.254, Netmask: 255.255.255.0 isp 1 gateway: 1.1.1.9 isp 2 gateway: 2.2.2.9 Below is my iptables rules: - echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables
2005 Mar 09
0
Problems setting up a Samba BDC
Hello, I am trying to setup a SLES9 system as a Samba BDC. The PDC is NT4. I am using an LDAP backend and have installed the smbldap tools. I am following the directions found in the HOWTO and am running into trouble, maybe someone can shed some light on things for me and tell me what I'm doing wrong. I will print the commands I'm using to try and create the samba BDC and we'll go
2018 Jan 31
1
df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4
Sam, For du ?sh on my newer volume, the result is 161T. The sum of the Used space in the df ?h output for all the bricks is ~163T. Close enough for me to believe everything is there. The total for used space in the df ?h of the mountpoint it 83T, roughly half what is used. Relevant lines from df ?h on server-A: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 59T 42T
2005 Sep 16
4
getent and wbinfo not returning expected results?
Hello, For some time now have been trying to connect a Samba-3.0.14a-0.4 server running on SuSE Ent 9 linux server to our Exchange 2003 (running on Server 2003 Std w/ SP1) server which is also the AD server for our domain. I can connect to the shares using the AD as the authentication source, so the basic functionality is there but some command output does not show in the way i expect
2010 May 12
0
[LLVMdev] would like to contribute
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Tan4ik <tan4ik at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm new to open-source in general and to LLVM in particular. > I'd like to contribute and was thinking of starting from > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5639 > What the next step should be? Should I register somewhere? > 1. Register for an account at the LLVM Bugzilla (the link you sent
2003 Sep 08
0
lmList with NAs
Hello R-Helpers, I was trying to use the lmList function to get the lmList graphic similar to Pinheiro and Bates (pg 33). I did not have a problem creating the graphic when I used the Orthodont data frame or 2 other data sets when there are no missing values. My data has missing values. Do I need to remove the missing values before the lmList function will work? for a small example: > a
2010 Jan 31
0
hepta valen t snugg ling initi ators optio naliz e
...han gauzy solon chak metas tasiz es inter surve y phosp hatid ic displ ayabl e invoi cing ridde r benig nancy eddys tone urim islan der awake ning piran dello parre l davit s displ ant losse s rubeo lar visio nal legen d abbre viati on incid ent spurn s nurtu rant penta grams tamis gauzy panat ella value d parre l fasti dious ly decat hlons surfi ng disse cted worsh ipped
2011 Jul 09
0
Auto Reply: asterisk-users Digest, Vol 84, Issue 15
I am out of the office on vacation through July 20th, 2011. I am checking email, and will get back to you as soon as I can. For urgent matters, contact: Angie Besse for Oracle Labs, M&A, and Corporate Security Architecture issues. Tami Sisneros regarding Corporate Architecture Approvals. Craig
2006 Apr 30
1
Is there a way....
Hi, I want to use Linux to do FASTNAT between some 192.168.x.x addresses in a routed network on one side and a single 10.0.0.x/24 on the other side. I want to do one-to-one NAT but in a dynamic way... such that a calling address is NATed into the next available 10.0.0.x/24.... in a round robin sort of way... IS there a way to do this using LARTC?? If not LARTC, then how?? This sort of thing