search for: takething

Hi All, A while back there was some mention that gpxe may acquire the ability to receive command-line parameters. I'd dearly love if this could become a reality. It would be fantastic if we could have a pxelinux menu config as follows: KERNEL gpxelinux.0 APPEND config http://someserver.net/gpxe-for-this-box.cfg This would solve a huge number of our problems since we don't have the

...ointers have been passed (eg: build something, pass it through a few APIs, underlying thing 'wants' to take ownership, but it will be constructed/destroyed before this API returns - so we hack around it either by having a "OwnsThing" flag in the underlying thing, or having a "takeThing" we hope we call before the underlying thing dies and destroys the thing)). We're dealing with types that have raw pointer + bool indicating ownership members or worse, types which take ownership but we lie to about giving them ownership (so some API takes a non-owning T* (or T&), pas...

Hi All, Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I've managed to get pxelinux to load gpxe and then manually load linux by using the gpxe command line and HTTP for the kernel and initial ram disk. My question is whether it is possible to somehow pass gpxe commands through some mechanism other than the DHCP filename response. Since I don't have control over our DHCP infrastructure, but do

Hi All, It appears the NetApp OnTap tftp server we were using doesn't implement the "OpCode: Error Code (5); Error Code: File not found (1)" response." so we just moved the tftp service to RHEL boxes running HPA tftpd. It's essential for our deployment system to locate the pxelinux config specific to an installation request based on it's MAC address. If the MAC based

Hi All, Now that we have multiboot capable pxelinux, thanks to mboot.c32, I decided to try and remove pxegrub from my x86 jumpstart infrastructure since, in theory, pxelinux can now do it all. The problem I'm having is I'm not very sure I'm following Tim's documentation correctly... I'm not 100% what comes after the --- and whether the Sun kernel needs it's arguments

Hi Erwan, First off, many thanks for your wonderful addition to syslinux: dmitest.c32 and another thankyou to hpa for it's inclusion. I need to ask if you are missing a couple of definitions in dmi_processor.h, specifically, the "long mode" flag. I need to use this flag to determine whether a machine is 64-bit capable or not. There is a great web page explaining the "long

for the googleable r-help archives, I thought I would post what I wrote into my .Rprofile to automatically set some system information. the most relevant aspect is the determination of mc.cores. this is useful when users want to use the parallel package options(uname= system("uname", intern=TRUE)) options(os= if (getOption("uname")=="Darwin") "osx"

Well, it has to happen at some point, so I have officially pushed out SYSLINUX 3.72. The big news in this release is of course the ISOLINUX hybrid mode support (a single image which can be booted either from a CD-ROM or from a hard disk/USB stick), but there are plenty of more goodies in here, including the label listing (not technically completion) on the Tab key. As usual, huge thanks to

On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Michael Brown via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Also, not a fork: http://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git/commitdiff/8406115 A fork is a fork, regardless the reasons behind it (yes, I have some understanding in this case). iPXE is based off of forking further development as of a certain gPXE commit with some backporting of gPXE development to iPXE. --

Would it be worthwhile to implement heuristics to auto-tune ''recordsize'', or would that not be worth the effort? -- Regards, Jeremy

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote: > Anton Yartsev <anton.yartsev at gmail.com> writes: > > Hello everyone, > > > > I bring to discussion the necessity/design of a new type of smart > pointer. > > r215176 and r217791 rise the problem, D5443 is devoted to the solution. > > r215176 applies several

On Sunday 25 November 2007 12:23, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On 2007-11-24, at 21:58, Jon Harrop wrote: > > - Garbage collection tuned for functional programming > > http://llvm.org/docs/GarbageCollection.html > > I've been doing some interesting work on this front. Getting Lattner- > cycles to have it reviewed and integrated is probably the biggest > challenge; LLVM