search for: tailcallto

...facilitate review (otherwise the > diff would contain no useful deltas), but it should go back where it > belongs afterwards. > • LowerX86_64CCCCallTo and LowerX86_64CCCCallTo were consolidated > with LowerCCCCallTo. > • I haven't yet tackled merging LowerCCCCallTo and LowerTailCallTo. > > There net savings is 405 LOC. > > I'd appreciate tests on Windows and x86-64 hosts, since some of the > logic was rather convoluted. This rebases this patch to r45536 (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20071231/056756.html ) and I also finished...

...CCCArguments was in order to facilitate review (otherwise the diff would contain no useful deltas), but it should go back where it belongs afterwards. LowerX86_64CCCCallTo and LowerX86_64CCCCallTo were consolidated with LowerCCCCallTo. I haven't yet tackled merging LowerCCCCallTo and LowerTailCallTo. There net savings is 405 LOC. I'd appreciate tests on Windows and x86-64 hosts, since some of the logic was rather convoluted. — Gordon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080101/bce074...