search for: tailcallarguments

...LL, 0)); + if (!isTailCall) + MemOpChains.push_back(DAG.getStore(Chain, Arg, PtrOff, NULL, 0)); + // Calculate and remember argument location. + else + CalculateTailCallArgDest(DAG, MF, isPPC64, Arg, SPDiff, ArgOffset, + TailCallArguments); + inMem = true; } if (inMem || isMachoABI) { @@ -1994,7 +2339,13 @@ SDOperand PPCTargetLowering::LowerCALL(SDOperand Op, SelectionDAG &DAG, } } } else { - MemOpChains.push_back(DAG.getStore(Chain, Arg, PtrOff, NULL, 0)); +...

...gt; + MemOpChains.push_back(DAG.getStore(Chain, Arg, PtrOff, > NULL, 0)); > + // Calculate and remember argument location. > + else > + CalculateTailCallArgDest(DAG, MF, isPPC64, Arg, SPDiff, > ArgOffset, > + TailCallArguments); > + > inMem = true; > } > if (inMem || isMachoABI) { > @@ -1994,7 +2339,13 @@ SDOperand > PPCTargetLowering::LowerCALL(SDOperand Op, SelectionDAG &DAG, > } > } > } else { > - MemOpChains.push_back...

Hello Dale, this is an updated version of the tail call optimization patch for powerpc. could you have a look at it? i added code to support ppc64 (untested, will try to get access to ppc64 on a friend's machine). incorporated evan's formatting suggestions. ;) will run another round of testing (llvm-test) on my powerpc g4/800 when i get the okay to commit. testing on this machine takes

...mOpChains.push_back(DAG.getStore(Chain, Arg, PtrOff, >> NULL, 0)); >> + // Calculate and remember argument location. >> + else >> + CalculateTailCallArgDest(DAG, MF, isPPC64, Arg, SPDiff, >> ArgOffset, >> + TailCallArguments); >> + >> inMem = true; >> } >> if (inMem || isMachoABI) { >> @@ -1994,7 +2339,13 @@ SDOperand >> PPCTargetLowering::LowerCALL(SDOperand Op, SelectionDAG &DAG, >> } >> } >> } else { >>...