search for: tag_siz

...<< 17)) > priv->num_tags = 1 << 17; /* we have 17 bits in PTE */ > priv->num_tags = (priv->num_tags + 63) & ~63; /* round up to 64 */ > @@ -170,8 +174,11 @@ gf100_ltc_init_tag_ram(struct nvkm_fb *pfb, struct nvkm_ltc_priv *priv) > tag_size += tag_align; > tag_size = (tag_size + 0xfff) >> 12; /* round up */ > > - ret = nvkm_mm_tail(&pfb->vram, 1, 1, tag_size, tag_size, 1, > - &priv->tag_ram); > + if (pfb->ram) > + ret = nvkm_mm_tail(&...

...km/subdev/ltc/gf100.c b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/ltc/gf100.c > index 8e7cc62..ceaa104 100644 > --- a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/ltc/gf100.c > +++ b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/ltc/gf100.c > @@ -170,8 +174,10 @@ gf100_ltc_init_tag_ram(struct nvkm_fb *pfb, struct nvkm_ltc_priv *priv) > tag_size += tag_align; > tag_size = (tag_size + 0xfff) >> 12; /* round up */ > > - ret = nvkm_mm_tail(&pfb->vram, 1, 1, tag_size, tag_size, 1, > - &priv->tag_ram); > + if (pfb->ram) > + ret = nvkm_mm_tail(&...

...0_ltcg_priv { struct nouveau_ltcg base; u32 part_nr; u32 subp_nr; - struct nouveau_mm tags; u32 num_tags; + u32 tag_base; + struct nouveau_mm tags; struct nouveau_mm_node *tag_ram; }; @@ -117,10 +118,6 @@ nvc0_ltcg_init_tag_ram(struct nouveau_fb *pfb, struct nvc0_ltcg_priv *priv) u32 tag_size, tag_margin, tag_align; int ret; - nv_wr32(priv, 0x17e8d8, priv->part_nr); - if (nv_device(pfb)->card_type >= NV_E0) - nv_wr32(priv, 0x17e000, priv->part_nr); - /* tags for 1/4 of VRAM should be enough (8192/4 per GiB of VRAM) */ priv->num_tags = (pfb->ram->size >&...

...v/ltcg/nvc0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c index bcca883..7288940 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/ltcg/nvc0.c @@ -142,7 +139,7 @@ nvc0_ltcg_init_tag_ram(struct nouveau_fb *pfb, struct nvc0_ltcg_priv *priv) tag_size += tag_align; tag_size = (tag_size + 0xfff) >> 12; /* round up */ - ret = nouveau_mm_tail(&pfb->vram, 0, tag_size, tag_size, 1, + ret = nouveau_mm_tail(&pfb->vram, 1, tag_size, tag_size, 1, &priv->tag_ram); if (ret) { priv->num_tags =...

...lt;< 17); if (priv->num_tags > (1 << 17)) priv->num_tags = 1 << 17; /* we have 17 bits in PTE */ priv->num_tags = (priv->num_tags + 63) & ~63; /* round up to 64 */ @@ -170,8 +174,10 @@ gf100_ltc_init_tag_ram(struct nvkm_fb *pfb, struct nvkm_ltc_priv *priv) tag_size += tag_align; tag_size = (tag_size + 0xfff) >> 12; /* round up */ - ret = nvkm_mm_tail(&pfb->vram, 1, 1, tag_size, tag_size, 1, - &priv->tag_ram); + if (pfb->ram) + ret = nvkm_mm_tail(&pfb->vram, 1, 1, tag_size, tag_size, 1, + &priv->tag_ram);...

...lt;< 17); if (priv->num_tags > (1 << 17)) priv->num_tags = 1 << 17; /* we have 17 bits in PTE */ priv->num_tags = (priv->num_tags + 63) & ~63; /* round up to 64 */ @@ -170,8 +174,11 @@ gf100_ltc_init_tag_ram(struct nvkm_fb *pfb, struct nvkm_ltc_priv *priv) tag_size += tag_align; tag_size = (tag_size + 0xfff) >> 12; /* round up */ - ret = nvkm_mm_tail(&pfb->vram, 1, 1, tag_size, tag_size, 1, - &priv->tag_ram); + if (pfb->ram) + ret = nvkm_mm_tail(&pfb->vram, 1, 1, tag_size, tag_size, 1, + &priv->tag_ram);...

Changes since v1: - Add missing else condition in ltc - Remove extra flags that slipped into nouveau_display.c and nv84_fence.c. Original cover letter: Patches 1-3 make the presence of a RAM device optional, and remove GK20A's dummy RAM driver we were using so far. On chips using shared memory, such a device can confuse the driver into moving objects where there is no need to, and can trick

A series I have waited too long to submit, and the recent refactoring made me pay the price of my perfectionism, so here are the features that are at least completed Patches 1-3 make the presence of a RAM device optional, and remove GK20A's dummy RAM driver we were using so far. On chips using shared memory, such a device can confuse the driver into moving objects where there is no need to,

...e; + for (i = 0; i < priv->subp_nr; ++i) + nv_wait(priv, 0x1410c8 + p * 0x2000 + i * 0x400, ~0, 0); + } +} + +/* TODO: Figure out tag memory details and drop the over-cautious allocation. + */ +static int +nvc0_ltcg_init_tag_ram(struct nouveau_fb *pfb, struct nvc0_ltcg_priv *priv) +{ + u32 tag_size, tag_margin, tag_align; + int ret; + + nv_wr32(priv, 0x17e8d8, priv->part_nr); + + /* tags for 1/4 of VRAM should be enough (8192/4 per GiB of VRAM) */ + priv->num_tags = (pfb->ram.size >> 17) / 4; + if (priv->num_tags > (1 << 17)) + priv->num_tags = 1 << 17; /...

...loud = true"], :order => "LTRIM(name)") end end CONTROLLER: def index @fetishes = Fetish.get_tag_cloud end VIEW: .... <% @fetishes.each do |fetish| -%> <li><%= link_to fetish.name, "/fetishes/#{fetish.id}", :class => "size#{fetish.tag_size}"%></li> <% end -%> .... I get the following error: stack level too deep /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.1.2/lib/active_record/attribute_methods.rb:244:in `method_missing'' /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.1.2/lib/active_record/attribute_methods....

...0_ltcg_priv { struct nouveau_ltcg base; u32 part_nr; u32 subp_nr; - struct nouveau_mm tags; u32 num_tags; + u32 tag_base; + struct nouveau_mm tags; struct nouveau_mm_node *tag_ram; }; @@ -117,10 +118,6 @@ nvc0_ltcg_init_tag_ram(struct nouveau_fb *pfb, struct nvc0_ltcg_priv *priv) u32 tag_size, tag_margin, tag_align; int ret; - nv_wr32(priv, 0x17e8d8, priv->part_nr); - if (nv_device(pfb)->card_type >= NV_E0) - nv_wr32(priv, 0x17e000, priv->part_nr); - /* tags for 1/4 of VRAM should be enough (8192/4 per GiB of VRAM) */ priv->num_tags = (pfb->ram->size >&...

...0_ltcg_priv { struct nouveau_ltcg base; u32 part_nr; u32 subp_nr; - struct nouveau_mm tags; u32 num_tags; + u32 tag_base; + struct nouveau_mm tags; struct nouveau_mm_node *tag_ram; }; @@ -117,10 +118,6 @@ nvc0_ltcg_init_tag_ram(struct nouveau_fb *pfb, struct nvc0_ltcg_priv *priv) u32 tag_size, tag_margin, tag_align; int ret; - nv_wr32(priv, 0x17e8d8, priv->part_nr); - if (nv_device(pfb)->card_type >= NV_E0) - nv_wr32(priv, 0x17e000, priv->part_nr); - /* tags for 1/4 of VRAM should be enough (8192/4 per GiB of VRAM) */ priv->num_tags = (pfb->ram->size >&...

...struct nouveau_mm tags; > u32 num_tags; > + u32 tag_base; > + struct nouveau_mm tags; > struct nouveau_mm_node *tag_ram; > }; > > @@ -117,10 +118,6 @@ nvc0_ltcg_init_tag_ram(struct nouveau_fb *pfb, struct nvc0_ltcg_priv *priv) > u32 tag_size, tag_margin, tag_align; > int ret; > > - nv_wr32(priv, 0x17e8d8, priv->part_nr); > - if (nv_device(pfb)->card_type >= NV_E0) > - nv_wr32(priv, 0x17e000, priv->part_nr); > - > /* tags for 1/4 of VRAM should be enough (8192/4...

From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> Hi folks, This is an updated series for adding tag pre-allocation support of target fabric descriptor memory, utilizing Kent's latest in-flight per-cpu ida bits here: [PATCH v3] lib/idr.c rewrite, percpu ida/tag allocator http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137308733526328&w=2 Patch #1 includes target-core setup of

From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> Hi folks, This is an updated series for adding tag pre-allocation support of target fabric descriptor memory, utilizing Kent's latest in-flight per-cpu ida bits here: [PATCH v3] lib/idr.c rewrite, percpu ida/tag allocator http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137308733526328&w=2 Patch #1 includes target-core setup of

...nvkm_mm_fini(&priv->tags); - nvkm_mm_free(&pfb->vram, &priv->tag_ram); + if (pfb->ram) + nvkm_mm_free(&pfb->vram, &priv->tag_ram); nvkm_ltc_destroy(priv); } @@ -149,6 +150,12 @@ gf100_ltc_init_tag_ram(struct nvkm_fb *pfb, struct nvkm_ltc_priv *priv) u32 tag_size, tag_margin, tag_align; int ret; + /* No VRAM, no tags for now. */ + if (!pfb->ram) { + priv->num_tags = 0; + goto mm_init; + } + /* tags for 1/4 of VRAM should be enough (8192/4 per GiB of VRAM) */ priv->num_tags = (pfb->ram->size >> 17) / 4; if (priv->num_tags...

...am, &priv->tag_ram); > + if (pfb->ram) > + nvkm_mm_free(&pfb->vram, &priv->tag_ram); > > nvkm_ltc_destroy(priv); > } > @@ -149,6 +150,12 @@ gf100_ltc_init_tag_ram(struct nvkm_fb *pfb, struct nvkm_ltc_priv *priv) > u32 tag_size, tag_margin, tag_align; > int ret; > > + /* No VRAM, no tags for now. */ > + if (!pfb->ram) { > + priv->num_tags = 0; > + goto mm_init; > + } > + > /* tags for 1/4 of VRAM should be enough (8192/4 per Gi...

...lk_integrity *bi, char *page) } static struct integrity_sysfs_entry integrity_format_entry = { - .attr = { .name = "format", .mode = S_IRUGO }, + .attr = { .name = "format", .mode = 0444 }, .show = integrity_format_show, }; static struct integrity_sysfs_entry integrity_tag_size_entry = { - .attr = { .name = "tag_size", .mode = S_IRUGO }, + .attr = { .name = "tag_size", .mode = 0444 }, .show = integrity_tag_size_show, }; static struct integrity_sysfs_entry integrity_interval_entry = { - .attr = { .name = "protection_interval_bytes", .mo...

...lk_integrity *bi, char *page) } static struct integrity_sysfs_entry integrity_format_entry = { - .attr = { .name = "format", .mode = S_IRUGO }, + .attr = { .name = "format", .mode = 0444 }, .show = integrity_format_show, }; static struct integrity_sysfs_entry integrity_tag_size_entry = { - .attr = { .name = "tag_size", .mode = S_IRUGO }, + .attr = { .name = "tag_size", .mode = 0444 }, .show = integrity_tag_size_show, }; static struct integrity_sysfs_entry integrity_interval_entry = { - .attr = { .name = "protection_interval_bytes", .mo...

From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> Hi folks, This is an updated series for adding tag pre-allocation support of target fabric descriptor memory, utilizing Kent's latest per-cpu ida bits here, along with Christoph Lameter's latest comments: [PATCH 04/10] idr: Percpu ida http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137160026006974&w=2 The first patch is a