search for: tackled

Hi! I was wondering whether anybody was looking at the bugs on Bugzilla. I'm asking because I've seen bugs tackled on the mailing list quite quickly, but two fully reproducible reports I've filed on Bugzilla haven't triggered any reaction in several weeks (for the older one). FWIW, these are: - Line goes beyond plot region https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16299 - format() does not r...

Dear sir; may you drop me some idea how can i get rid of following error message: Error in switch(nmeth, { : NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call (arg 1) i dont know what does nmeth and ther rest of error message mean? i have a file which contains 460 rows and 174 columns including missing value as NA. Regards, Mostafa

Hi, I got a broadvoice "business" account under the byod(bring your own device) program. I have applied the patches and created new asterisk debian packages. I have the account working on inbound and outbound. The problem area is outbound caller ID. I have 3 other accounts with IAX2 providers and have no problem setting the caller ID on outbound calls. I called them and they

Hello: I'd like to know how and if the GLM convergence problems are addressed in gamlss. For simplicity, let's focus on Normal and Negative Binomial with log link. The convergence issues of the glm() function were alleviated in 2011 when glm2 package was released. Package gamlss was released in 2012, so it might still use the glm-like solution or call glm() directly. Is that the case or

Dear everyone, I'm student of Masters in Statistics (Actuarial) from Central University of Rajasthan, India. I am doing a major project work as a part of the degree. My major project deals with fitting a glm model for the data of car insurance. I'm facing the problem of multicollinearity for this data which is visible by the plotting of data. But I'm not able to test it. In the case

I'm learning R and am converting some code from SPSS into R. My background is in SAS/SPSS so the vectorization is new to me and I'm trying to learn how to NOT use loops...or use them sparingly. I'm wondering what the most efficient to tackle a problem I'm working on is. Below is an example piece of code. Essentially what it does is set a variable to zero, loop through item

On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: >> No, gfortran in gcc 4.0 is, ehm, highly experimental (read: a piece of >> junk). Gfortran in gcc 4.1 was the first one that worked for NIST (and >> for SPEC). > > Hm. I had noticed a bunch of changes in the current sources, but had > hoped 4.0.1 wasn't too far behind. This is discouraging. So, it sounds > like it

I have a Cisco 6509 switch that I'm monitoring with SNMP from a CentOS5 machine. SNMP polls are the only access I have to this device, we are not allowed to log on via telnet. How can I find out which port on the switch a particular server is connected to? I was hoping that this is somehow possible using the mac address and the data gathered from snmpwalk/snmpget requests but I'm not

All, I am getting ready to tackle a classicupgrade. Test runs have gone well. I am just wondering about the Windows client machines after the upgrade. Do I need to remove the previously applied registry changes: DomainCompatibilityMode DNSNameResolutionRequired Do I need to dis-join, and re-join the clients? Current setup is: Single Server: Samba NT4/PDC LDAPsam New setup is: Single Server:

Printing support is added to the repository (as you have seen / will see). Kudos to Sean for tackling such a big bear. I''ll work on adding the two dialogs to bigdemo later unless Sean tackles it first. Roy

On Mar 24, 2008, at 10:47 PM, Christopher Lamb wrote: > I know that this has been discussed (at least in passing) a few > times on the list, but I couldn't locate a bug for it. Have any > architectural plans been made for it? Funny you bring this up. Evan and I were tossing around crazy ideas about this just today. If you're interested, maybe we should get together for

On 7/30/13 7:35 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek wrote: > On 7/29/2013 6:28 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: >> >> You mean that LICM and Unswitching should be left for later? For the >> purpose of exposing scalar optimizations, I'm not sure I agree with >> that but I'd be interested in examples. > > Optimizations like LICM, and unswitching can potentially damage >

On 01/18/18 09:01, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/18/2018 07:51 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 5:03 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >> >> So, if we applied the previous microcode update, and all our machines >> rebooted OK, then we don't need to fallback? >> >> Also, do we know if the updated CentOS microcode RPM

...t is not rare, i have 10 times 2 MB on my mail server. Is there a way to tackle this. Maybe by making the alias a mailbox itself and give other users acces or are there other options. Also i have very lame and lazy users. They refuse to clean thrash cans (i asked about that earlier,and got that tackled through the expire plugin.),also the do not remove old mail not even reading it. So is there also a option to remove mail that is not been opened, and is older than xx days or weeks. Thanks -- _______________________ *Johan Hendriks* *Schavemaker Transport* Tel: +31 (0)251 229098 Fax: +31 (0)2...

I know that this has been discussed (at least in passing) a few times on the list, but I couldn't locate a bug for it. Have any architectural plans been made for it? Are there architectural roadblocks with the current LLVM infrastructure that will complicate the process? What has demotivated the implementation of this so far (is it not that big a benefit on important targets, too

Hi, I was looking at some bugs to play with, and I started with http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18606 As I commented there, a loop is unrolled and exhibit this pattern: %mul.1 = mul i32 %mul, %mul %mul.2 = mul i32 %mul.1, %mul.1 .... With an unroll factor of 32, the last multiply has 2^32 terms in its SCEV expression. (I mean I expect it would have those terms if I was patient

On Sep 17, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > LLVM's internal command line library needs to evolve. We have an immediate need to build LLVM as a library free of static initializers, but before brute-force fixing this problem, I'd like outline the incremental steps that will lead to a desirable long term solution. We want infrastructure in place to

...ows that contain observations on all variables and I want to extract this subset from the original list (of lists). I'm pretty sure I can do it programmatically in R but it will take me a few hours to write and debug. Before I start down that road I thought I'd ask if anyone had already tackled this particular type problem already. Thanks a lot, Mark Schultz

On 9/11/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > >> No, gfortran in gcc 4.0 is, ehm, highly experimental (read: a piece of > >> junk). Gfortran in gcc 4.1 was the first one that worked for NIST (and > >> for SPEC). > > > > Hm. I had noticed a bunch of changes in the current sources, but had >

Folks, A few people have made me aware of some omissions in my files (not my fault, they weren't in the Script from the Wiki) which I shall be tackling this weekend. Whilst I'm making the files are there any other files you want? IVR's etc. If so make sure I have a script sent by email. -- Mark Phillips, G7LTT/KC2ENI Randolph, NJ