search for: tackel

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "tackel".

Did you mean: tacked
2006 Oct 31
1
[LLVMdev] OT: Stern Environmental Review, a British Government Report published Online
The Stern Environmental Review, a British Government Report into tackeling global climate change has been published online. Leader page with presentation and speaking notes :- http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/stern_review_economics_climate_change/sternreview_index.cfm The Stern Review Report :- http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independ...
2005 Feb 18
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM built on VS C++ 2005
...yntax (-x86-asm-syntax={intel|att}). The missing pieces are the > various assembler directives that need to be tweaked. Making this change > is much less involved than changing the syntax of the instructions. Nice, I really need to familiarize myself with LLVM's documentation before tackelling any real programming as such. Porting from 2003 to 2005 was not really that deeper problem. > I think that G++ has some support for linking to native windows libraries, > using by MingW? We should eventually be able to do as well as it does. > Note that for non C/C++ compilers, th...
2009 Feb 27
1
[LLVMdev] -fPIC warning on every compile on Cygwin
...2) ? The only way I can think of this happening is if > that's erroneously false. > > Hi Nick, I am not famuliar enought with the build system to do this. Can you give me a resision number to check out before your changes so I can get my code tested. Then once I have done that I can tackel giving you some valid feedback. Thanks, Aaron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090227/7433fcd4/attachment.html>
2005 Feb 18
7
[LLVMdev] LLVM built on VS C++ 2005
...of Windows PE > (Portable Executable) EXE and DLL files from ahead of time machine code > generation which I believe LLVM can generate ? Also possibly of Microsoft > OBJ and LIB files. Yes, this would be very valuable. > This is an area I am reasonably familiar with and would like to tackel. > It will take me a while studying LLVM's interfaces and code to get into > a position to be able to code this. Anyway get NASMW generation first as > a baseline for Win32. LLVM can generate C to be compiled with MinGW or > VC at the moment presumably. > >> So the ques...
2005 Feb 18
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM built on VS C++ 2005
...files. Again ABI's rear their head again, maybe we go for a native format that will link with Win32 C for Win32 API support. Then look at full MS C/C++ ABI support later. We could create and compile a runtime once we a frontend. This is an area I am reasonably familiar with and would like to tackel. It will take me a while studying LLVM's interfaces and code to get into a position to be able to code this. Anyway get NASMW generation first as a baseline for Win32. LLVM can generate C to be compiled with MinGW or VC at the moment presumably. > So the question is, what would you like to...
2005 May 05
3
[LLVMdev] I'm done :)
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote: > Chris, > Chris Lattner wrote: >> For anyone who is interested: >> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/pubs/2005-05-04-LattnerPHDThesis.html > > many congrats, and best wishes for the future! Thanks all! > And I hope you still will have some time to look after LLVM and won't > get too distracted by some new exciting other
2005 Feb 18
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM built on VS C++ 2005
Aaron Gray wrote: >> GCC is smart enough to realize it doesn't return. That's because the >> declaration of abort() is decorated with __attribute__((__noreturn__)). >> >> So is GCC smarter than VC++? As it turns out, in VC++ the >> declaration of abort() is decorated with __declspec(noreturn). >> >> Whidbey is not stricter than 2003, it is
2009 Feb 27
0
[LLVMdev] -fPIC warning on every compile on Cygwin
Aaron Gray wrote: > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca > <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca>> wrote: > > Aaron Gray wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca > <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca> > > <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca>>> wrote:
2009 Feb 25
3
[LLVMdev] -fPIC warning on every compile on Cygwin
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > Aaron Gray wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca > > <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca>> wrote: > > > > Aaron Gray wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca > >
2003 Apr 02
8
lm with an arbitrary number of terms
Hello folks, Any ideas how to do this? data.frame is a data frame with column names "x1",...,"xn" y is a response variable of length dim(data.frame)[1] I want to write a function function(y, data.frame){ lm(y~x1+...+xn) } This would be easy if n was always the same. If n is arbitrary how could I feed the x1+...+xn terms into lm(response~terms)? Thanks Richard -- Dr.
2013 Jul 30
3
SMB throughput inquiry, Jeremy, and James' bow tie
I went to the site to subscribe again and ended up watching some of Jeremy's Google interviews. I particularly enjoyed the interview with James and the bow tie lesson at the end. :) So anyway, I recently upgraded my home network to end-to-end GbE. My clients are Windows XP SP3 w/hot fixes, and my Samba server is 3.5.6 atop vanilla kernel.org Linux 3.2.6 and Debian 6.0.6. With FDX fast