search for: tablegenerating

Hi All, I am trying to install Asterisk with FreePBX while running install_amp following error is coming can any one help in this regards Thanks in advance.. Linga Reddy Connecting to database..OK Connecting to Asterisk manager interface..OK DB Error: no such tableGenerating AMP configs..OK Restarting Flash Operator Panel..OK

On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 07:34:50PM -0800, Tim Northover wrote: > The biggest difference and problem I see would be building the thing, > since the target's headers are going to be needed, but they're > private. That means they're not shipped with LLVM so you'd need the > source (and an active build directory for the TableGenerated files, >

Hi all, I've been doing some LLVM development recently, as was curious about the status/feasibility of allowing developers to write out-of-tree back-end passes (e.g. `MachineFunctionPass`es) in a matter similar to middle-end passes. From the limited resources I can find online[1][2][3], LLVM currently doesn't support building back-end passes outside of the source tree. Could anybody more

...uld be applied to > produce TableGen-generated instcombine passes? It would be nice to > re-use many of the rules, for example, except they'd match LLVM IR > rather than MIR. As you go about implementation, maybe keep this idea > in mind? That's an interesting idea. Certainly tablegenerating InstCombine ought to be possible and sharing code sounds like it ought to be doable. MIR and IR are pretty similar especially after IRTranslator (which is a direct translation) through to the Legalizer (which is the first point target instructions can until targets make custom passes). From the Leg...

Hi, I'm playing with tableGenerator in order to add custom attirbute. Most of attributes are parsed from ($clang_dir)/include/clang/AST/Attrs.inc, which is generated by tableGen based on *.td, but this generated include file is deleted after parsing completes. Is there any compilation option to keep this, or any other way to do it? Thank you for your valuable time! -- Best, Sung

> On Nov 29, 2018, at 02:02, Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 27.11.18 19:01, Daniel Sanders wrote: >> ...Continued from the other email >> _Removing the defs section_ >> We can potentially infer quite a lot of the defs section but it requires both a complicated ruleset and that tblgen spends processing time doing the inferencing. That

> On Nov 13, 2018, at 08:01, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote: > > Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > >> That's an interesting idea. Certainly tablegenerating InstCombine >> ought to be possible and sharing code sounds like it ought to be >> doable. MIR and IR are pretty similar especially after IRTranslator >> (which is a direct translation) through to the Legalizer (which is the >> first point target instructions can until targe...

...Continued from the other email Removing the defs section We can potentially infer quite a lot of the defs section but it requires both a complicated ruleset and that tblgen spends processing time doing the inferencing. That processing time is potentially significant for large combiners and for that reason we need to be careful not to let inferencing become a burden on tblgen. My main worry

Hi All, I've been working on the GlobalISel combiner recently and I'd like to share the plan for how Combine Rules will be defined in GlobalISel and solicit feedback on it. This email ended up rather long so: TL;DR: We're planning to define GlobalISel Combine Rules using MIR syntax with a few bits glued on to interface with the algorithm and escape into C++ when we need to.