Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "ta3qtmlmgompgc9rfqqob5txuczgyd".
2015 Jan 26
0
LDA input validation
...the output
> is not-null, pipe it to dovecot-lda, otherwise pipe the original
> input.
(Y)
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEVAwUBVMXyLnz1H7kL/d9rAQJMfgf8ChF+8YSwDbGHribJO7fyOkrXVL81aiMG
PXQr3NYEpz4WF1sQT+4lWeTfh+5FJ2HuNXLd2erN8KY3rdcwnxPrYdiZDia02JUx
tA3QTMlmgOmPGc9rFqqob5TxuCzgYd+98dn4EokkNBUOK6J60J9uHmNKGkaZRXEd
KD49FEJ8MYx7O+NryspJkr7jZELxp8L0wrLHUSZ/QQkqJRj6CqLKDP+InpdcIKqI
Sp6sUF6BngFSS3x9+1xygjDOFWfc7KgmNu4gs+hsdPio+skY16QX8jhcKVCsYn/m
2Jv2wNB9vREe+2uDDc345Ssi5wnorhnn+fCrVKx7cDgziCRADDjPQA==
=RGxT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2015 Jan 26
3
LDA input validation
St?phane Cottin writes:
> dspam already send errors to syslog, the point here is to never loose
> email contents. This was a wrong design, i'm now use a wrapper instead
> ( see my previous post for details ).
You're stilling going to lose contents. If dspam fails, the mail
is dumped, the LDA returns exit code 75, and the MTA will probably
issue a bounce Email to the sender.