search for: t_vector

Danny wrote: I made a > simple function which was just supposed to multiply two 3 component > float vectors and return the result: "Vectors must have a power of two length (1, 2, 4, 8, 16 ...)." - http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#t_vector > //Snip on: > VectorType *vType = VectorType::get(Type::FloatTy, 3); Nick

...f.html @@ -1045,7 +1045,7 @@ classifications:</p> <td><a href="#t_integer">integer</a>, <a href="#t_floating">floating point</a>, <a href="#t_pointer">pointer</a>, - <a href="#t_vector">vector</a> + <a href="#t_vector">vector</a>, <a href="#t_struct">structure</a>, <a href="#t_array">array</a>, <a href="#t_label">label</a>.

...""""" The '``udiv``' instruction returns the quotient of its two operands. Arguments: """""""""" The two arguments to the '``udiv``' instruction must be :ref:`integer <t_integer>` or :ref:`vector <t_vector>` of integer values. Both arguments must have identical types. Semantics: """""""""" The value produced is the unsigned integer quotient of the two operands. Note that unsigned integer division and signed integer division are distinct operatio...

Before I get started with more questions, thanks for the prompt reply on my last set question, that was much appreciated. First, I found references to lazy inling and optimizations for calling functions across modules, but I can't figure out how to do that. If I just take a Function* that I got out of one module and call it from the other, it doesn't work. What's the general

Hi, My organization is doing a technology comparison between GCC optimization/backend and LLVM infrastructures to select the best environment for our next product. Would you please help me to find answers on the following features’ list support availability inside current (or near future) LLVM implementation: 1. Intrinsic function support 2. Semi-standard embedded C types (complex, fractional)