Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "t_run_test".
2015 Nov 21
2
Recent -Os code size regressions
...se before and
after case.
Before
:
As a reference point, I found OR $0x408 and OR $0x810 in close proximity.
278: 81 ca 10 08 00 00 or $0x810,%edx
27e: 89 10 mov %edx,(%eax)
280: f6 c1 40
test $0x40,%cl
283: 74 08 je 28d <t_run_test+0x28d>
285: 81 ca 08 04 00 00 or $0x408,%edx
28b: 89 10 mov %edx,(%eax)
28d: 84 c9 test %cl,%cl
28f: 0f 89 34 01 00 00 jns 3c9 <t_run_test+0x3c9>
After
r252152:
Note that the OR $0x408 and OR $0x810 come
now
in reverse order....
2015 Nov 21
3
Recent -Os code size regressions
Maybe adjust this to be different for –Os, -Oz than for –O2?
Kevin Smith
From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of James Molloy via llvm-dev
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 4:05 PM
To: Steve King <steve at metrokings.com>; Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>
Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Recent -Os code