search for: t_reserv

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "t_reserv".

Did you mean: preserv
2018 Feb 06
2
[RFC] virtio-iommu version 0.6
Please find version 0.6 of the virtio-iommu specification at the following locations. Document: http://jpbrucker.net/virtio-iommu/spec/virtio-iommu.pdf http://jpbrucker.net/virtio-iommu/spec/virtio-iommu.html Sources: git://linux-arm.org/virtio-iommu.git viommu/v0.6 I didn't receive any comment for v0.5 [1], so this update is fairly light: * Changed range definition in map and
2018 Mar 21
2
[virtio-dev] [RFC] virtio-iommu version 0.6
...t; completes, the endpoint cannot access any mapping from that > domain anymore " > > Does it make sense to mention BYPASS situation upon this request? Sure, I'll add something to clarify that situation > --2.6.8.2 Property RESV_MEM -- > > "VIRTIO_IOMMU_RESV_MEM_T_RESERVED (0) Accesses to > virtual addresses in this region are not translated by the device. > They may either be aborted by the device (or the underlying > IOMMU), bypass it, or never even reach it" > > in 3.3 hardware device assignment you described an example > that a reser...
2018 Mar 21
2
[virtio-dev] [RFC] virtio-iommu version 0.6
...t; completes, the endpoint cannot access any mapping from that > domain anymore " > > Does it make sense to mention BYPASS situation upon this request? Sure, I'll add something to clarify that situation > --2.6.8.2 Property RESV_MEM -- > > "VIRTIO_IOMMU_RESV_MEM_T_RESERVED (0) Accesses to > virtual addresses in this region are not translated by the device. > They may either be aborted by the device (or the underlying > IOMMU), bypass it, or never even reach it" > > in 3.3 hardware device assignment you described an example > that a reser...
2018 Mar 19
0
[virtio-dev] [RFC] virtio-iommu version 0.6
...--2.6.4 DETACH request-- " Detach an endpoint from its domain. When this request completes, the endpoint cannot access any mapping from that domain anymore " Does it make sense to mention BYPASS situation upon this request? --2.6.8.2 Property RESV_MEM -- "VIRTIO_IOMMU_RESV_MEM_T_RESERVED (0) Accesses to virtual addresses in this region are not translated by the device. They may either be aborted by the device (or the underlying IOMMU), bypass it, or never even reach it" in 3.3 hardware device assignment you described an example that a reserved range is stolen by host to...
2018 Mar 22
0
[virtio-dev] [RFC] virtio-iommu version 0.6
...ny mapping from that > > domain anymore " > > > > Does it make sense to mention BYPASS situation upon this request? > > Sure, I'll add something to clarify that situation > > > --2.6.8.2 Property RESV_MEM -- > > > > "VIRTIO_IOMMU_RESV_MEM_T_RESERVED (0) Accesses to > > virtual addresses in this region are not translated by the device. > > They may either be aborted by the device (or the underlying > > IOMMU), bypass it, or never even reach it" > > > > in 3.3 hardware device assignment you described an examp...