search for: t_h2g

..._transport { > struct module *module; > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > index cc8659838bf2..c9e5bad59dc1 100644 > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > @@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ static const struct vsock_transport *transport_h2g; > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_g2h; > /* Transport used for DGRAM communication */ > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_dgram; > +/* Transport used for local communication */ > +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_local; > static DEFIN...

..._transport { > struct module *module; > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > index cc8659838bf2..c9e5bad59dc1 100644 > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > @@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ static const struct vsock_transport *transport_h2g; > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_g2h; > /* Transport used for DGRAM communication */ > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_dgram; > +/* Transport used for local communication */ > +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_local; > static DEFIN...

...t; diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > > > index cc8659838bf2..c9e5bad59dc1 100644 > > > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > > > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > > > @@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ static const struct vsock_transport > *transport_h2g; > > > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_g2h; > > > /* Transport used for DGRAM communication */ > > > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_dgram; > > > +/* Transport used for local communication */ > > > +static const struct vs...

...t; diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > > > index cc8659838bf2..c9e5bad59dc1 100644 > > > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > > > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > > > @@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ static const struct vsock_transport > *transport_h2g; > > > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_g2h; > > > /* Transport used for DGRAM communication */ > > > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_dgram; > > > +/* Transport used for local communication */ > > > +static const struct vs...

...t module *module; > > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > > index cc8659838bf2..c9e5bad59dc1 100644 > > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > > @@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ static const struct vsock_transport *transport_h2g; > > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_g2h; > > /* Transport used for DGRAM communication */ > > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_dgram; > > +/* Transport used for local communication */ > > +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_...

...insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c index c52203fe52c4..c5f46b8242ce 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c @@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ static struct proto vsock_proto = { static const struct vsock_transport *transport_h2g; /* Transport used for guest->host communication */ static const struct vsock_transport *transport_g2h; +/* Transport used for both host->guest and guest->host communication */ +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_hg; /* Transport used for DGRAM communication */ static const...

...sock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > > > > index cc8659838bf2..c9e5bad59dc1 100644 > > > > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > > > > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > > > > @@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ static const struct vsock_transport > > *transport_h2g; > > > > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_g2h; > > > > /* Transport used for DGRAM communication */ > > > > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_dgram; > > > > +/* Transport used for local communication */ > > > &gt...

v2: - style fixes [Dave] - removed RCU sync and changed 'the_vsock_loopback' in a global static variable [Stefan] - use G2H transport when local transport is not loaded and remote cid is VMADDR_CID_LOCAL [Stefan] - rebased on net-next v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11251735/ This series introduces a new transport (vsock_loopback) to handle local communication. This

...130,12 @@ static struct proto vsock_proto = { #define VSOCK_DEFAULT_BUFFER_MAX_SIZE (1024 * 256) #define VSOCK_DEFAULT_BUFFER_MIN_SIZE 128 -static const struct vsock_transport *transport_single; +/* Transport used for host->guest communication */ +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_h2g; +/* Transport used for guest->host communication */ +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_g2h; +/* Transport used for DGRAM communication */ +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_dgram; static DEFINE_MUTEX(vsock_register_mutex); /**** UTILS ****/ @@ -182,7 +187,7 @@ stat...

...130,12 @@ static struct proto vsock_proto = { #define VSOCK_DEFAULT_BUFFER_MAX_SIZE (1024 * 256) #define VSOCK_DEFAULT_BUFFER_MIN_SIZE 128 -static const struct vsock_transport *transport_single; +/* Transport used for host->guest communication */ +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_h2g; +/* Transport used for guest->host communication */ +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_g2h; +/* Transport used for DGRAM communication */ +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_dgram; static DEFINE_MUTEX(vsock_register_mutex); /**** UTILS ****/ @@ -182,7 +187,7 @@ stat...

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using

Most of the patches are reviewed by Dexuan, Stefan, and Jorgen. The following patches need reviews: - [11/15] vsock: add multi-transports support - [12/15] vsock/vmci: register vmci_transport only when VMCI guest/host are active - [15/15] vhost/vsock: refuse CID assigned to the guest->host transport RFC: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1168442/ v1:

This series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use VSOCK with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using VMware

This series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use VSOCK with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using VMware