search for: t_function

The CentOS project has been running Continuous Integration (aka CI) process where we run checks from our t_functional suite on a daily basis for quite a while now: https://ci.centos.org/view/CentOS-Core-QA/ We will continue to run these daily as they provide good historical info, but recently, we have adopted a practice of "Pre Release" testing using the same t_functional suite. So, from now on, we...

...ote:] >> >> Nevertheless, the LLVM Language Reference document suggests, in the examples for the Function Types section, that parameter attributes are part of function types. > > Where exactly? I don't see it in the online version. See <http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#t_function> and look at the second example: float (i16 signext, i32 *) * Pointer to a function that takes an i16 that should be sign extended and a pointer to i32, returning float. Hence, my confusion over the issue. If parameter attributes aren't included in function types, then I'd like to...

In another thread I talked about running CI testing on a packge before release. I thought I would explain that a bit more AND ask for tests, if they are needed. Prior to pushing newly released packages into the main CentOS os, updates, extras, cr, or fasttrack repositories, we run our t_functional CI test suite on the entire repo set. So if we are releasing an update, it would be against the os and updates repositories. Or if we release fasttrack package, it would be os, updates, fasttrack repositories. We also run this test suite on the final OS repository during point release upgrades...

Thanks for the replies. I understood that a major part of testing being done by Redhat. But after repackaging the sources how doest CentOS make sure the integrity of the product. Is it being done by a dedicated team or by community ? On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 09:49:42AM +0530, Sudhi wrote: > >

On Mar 1, 2010, at 09:56, james woodyatt wrote: > On Mar 1, 2010, at 04:43, Duncan Sands wrote: >> >> Where exactly? I don't see it in the online version. > > See <http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#t_function> and look at the second example: > > float (i16 signext, i32 *) * > > Pointer to a function that takes an i16 that should be sign extended > and a pointer to i32, returning float. > > Hence, my confusion over the issue. If parameter attributes aren't included in f...

There is a Fedora Activity Day (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD_Documentation_2016 ) centered around documentation, where I'm going to see what can be done about the state of centos documentation from upstream sources. Most of the tooling for documentation for these two groups is centered around git. For the most part, our documentation currently lives in the wiki, and has a fairly high

Hi James, > I can see how to apply attributes to function parameters and return values when defining and declaring functions, but I don't see how to do it for function type definitions. you can't. It used to be the case long ago that attributes went on types, but now they go only on calls and function declarations. > Nevertheless, the LLVM Language Reference document suggests, in

Can anyone tell me, In the following instruction %"struct.std::locale::facet" = type { i32 (...)**, i32 } what does i32 (...)** means? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100718/3f9fe5fe/attachment.html>

...ation workflow? I would be fine with such a move. > > I think this would help lower the barrier to contribution by allowing > new contributors to submit a pull request or patch for documentation > rather than join a mailing list, request access, etc. Agreed. Similar to what we do with t_functional tests. > > What are the thoughts or concerns about this sort of workflow change? > > > > all the best Christoph -- Christoph Galuschka CentOS-QA-Team member | IRC: tigalch

...ames woodyatt <jhw at conjury.org> wrote: > On Mar 1, 2010, at 09:56, james woodyatt wrote: >> On Mar 1, 2010, at 04:43, Duncan Sands wrote: >>> >>> Where exactly?  I don't see it in the online version. >> >> See <http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#t_function> and look at the second example: >> >>       float (i16 signext, i32 *) * >> >>       Pointer to a function that takes an i16 that should be sign extended >>       and a pointer to i32, returning float. >> >> Hence, my confusion over the issue.  If param...

everyone-- I'm confused about what I'm seeing in LLVM 2.6, and I have a series of related questions. I can see how to apply attributes to function parameters and return values when defining and declaring functions, but I don't see how to do it for function type definitions. It's certainly absent from the OCaml bindings. I'm also not seeing it in the C-langauge bindings over

On 07/17/2018 05:51 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/15/2018 03:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS <centos at centos.org >>> wrote: >> >>> Am 15.07.2018 um 20:03 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr>: >>>> >>>> Le 15/07/2018 ? 19:49, Matthew Phelps a ?crit :