search for: t_dgram

...a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > @@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ static const struct vsock_transport *transport_h2g; > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_g2h; > /* Transport used for DGRAM communication */ > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_dgram; > +/* Transport used for local communication */ > +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_local; > static DEFINE_MUTEX(vsock_register_mutex); > > /**** UTILS ****/ > @@ -2130,7 +2132,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_core_get_transport); > > int vsock_core_register(...

...a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > @@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ static const struct vsock_transport *transport_h2g; > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_g2h; > /* Transport used for DGRAM communication */ > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_dgram; > +/* Transport used for local communication */ > +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_local; > static DEFINE_MUTEX(vsock_register_mutex); > > /**** UTILS ****/ > @@ -2130,7 +2132,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_core_get_transport); > > int vsock_core_register(...

..._vsock/af_vsock.c > > > @@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ static const struct vsock_transport > *transport_h2g; > > > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_g2h; > > > /* Transport used for DGRAM communication */ > > > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_dgram; > > > +/* Transport used for local communication */ > > > +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_local; > > > static DEFINE_MUTEX(vsock_register_mutex); > > > > > > /**** UTILS ****/ > > > @@ -2130,7 +2132,7 @@ > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL...

..._vsock/af_vsock.c > > > @@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ static const struct vsock_transport > *transport_h2g; > > > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_g2h; > > > /* Transport used for DGRAM communication */ > > > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_dgram; > > > +/* Transport used for local communication */ > > > +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_local; > > > static DEFINE_MUTEX(vsock_register_mutex); > > > > > > /**** UTILS ****/ > > > @@ -2130,7 +2132,7 @@ > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL...

...c > > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c > > @@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ static const struct vsock_transport *transport_h2g; > > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_g2h; > > /* Transport used for DGRAM communication */ > > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_dgram; > > +/* Transport used for local communication */ > > +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_local; > > static DEFINE_MUTEX(vsock_register_mutex); > > > > /**** UTILS ****/ > > @@ -2130,7 +2132,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_core_get_transport); > &...

...t; > > @@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ static const struct vsock_transport > > *transport_h2g; > > > > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_g2h; > > > > /* Transport used for DGRAM communication */ > > > > static const struct vsock_transport *transport_dgram; > > > > +/* Transport used for local communication */ > > > > +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_local; > > > > static DEFINE_MUTEX(vsock_register_mutex); > > > > > > > > /**** UTILS ****/ > > > > @@ -2130,7 +21...

...t;host communication */ static const struct vsock_transport *transport_g2h; +/* Transport used for both host->guest and guest->host communication */ +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_hg; /* Transport used for DGRAM communication */ static const struct vsock_transport *transport_dgram; static DEFINE_MUTEX(vsock_register_mutex); @@ -402,10 +404,13 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk) vsk->transport = transport_dgram; break; case SOCK_STREAM: - if (vsk->remote_addr.svm_cid > VMADDR_CID_HOST) + if (vsk->remote_addr.svm...

v2: - style fixes [Dave] - removed RCU sync and changed 'the_vsock_loopback' in a global static variable [Stefan] - use G2H transport when local transport is not loaded and remote cid is VMADDR_CID_LOCAL [Stefan] - rebased on net-next v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11251735/ This series introduces a new transport (vsock_loopback) to handle local communication. This

...sport used for host->guest communication */ +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_h2g; +/* Transport used for guest->host communication */ +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_g2h; +/* Transport used for DGRAM communication */ +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_dgram; static DEFINE_MUTEX(vsock_register_mutex); /**** UTILS ****/ @@ -182,7 +187,7 @@ static int vsock_auto_bind(struct vsock_sock *vsk) return __vsock_bind(sk, &local_addr); } -static int __init vsock_init_tables(void) +static void vsock_init_tables(void) { int i; @@ -191,7 +196,6 @@...

...sport used for host->guest communication */ +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_h2g; +/* Transport used for guest->host communication */ +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_g2h; +/* Transport used for DGRAM communication */ +static const struct vsock_transport *transport_dgram; static DEFINE_MUTEX(vsock_register_mutex); /**** UTILS ****/ @@ -182,7 +187,7 @@ static int vsock_auto_bind(struct vsock_sock *vsk) return __vsock_bind(sk, &local_addr); } -static int __init vsock_init_tables(void) +static void vsock_init_tables(void) { int i; @@ -191,7 +196,6 @@...

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using

Most of the patches are reviewed by Dexuan, Stefan, and Jorgen. The following patches need reviews: - [11/15] vsock: add multi-transports support - [12/15] vsock/vmci: register vmci_transport only when VMCI guest/host are active - [15/15] vhost/vsock: refuse CID assigned to the guest->host transport RFC: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1168442/ v1:

This series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use VSOCK with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using VMware

This series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use VSOCK with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using VMware