search for: t8269

Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> writes: > I'll go ahead and file one though - more and more people are using phab > for llvm, so the problems with it are coming up more and more often. https://secure.phabricator.com/T8269

On 5/19/15 7:02 PM, Matthias Braun wrote: > They happen for things like closing a revision, adding dependencies or subscribers. But I agree that they are pretty useless because they don't actually mention the action that triggered the mail but just contain the accompanying comment which may be empty. Last time I brought this up, I was pointed at Phabricator's Phabricator as the place