search for: t7358

...Knight via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Does anyone know why phab sometimes misses replies sent by email? Usually > > they make it through, but sometimes not. > > Doesn't seem to be a trivial thing to do: > > https://secure.phabricator.com/T7358 > > https://secure.phabricator.com/T5181 > > cheers, > --renato > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160525/d9dd2f5b/attachment.html>

On 19 May 2016 at 19:59, James Y Knight via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Does anyone know why phab sometimes misses replies sent by email? Usually > they make it through, but sometimes not. Doesn't seem to be a trivial thing to do: https://secure.phabricator.com/T7358 https://secure.phabricator.com/T5181 cheers, --renato

Does anyone know why phab sometimes misses replies sent by email? Usually they make it through, but sometimes not. For example, a recent email from Rafael (which I got through the llvm-commits list) seems to be addressed to the proper thing @ reviews.llvm.org, yet seems to have never made it onto the website. Not having not seen that response (because I was looking on the website), I ended up

...lt;mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > Does anyone know why phab sometimes misses replies sent by email? Usually > > they make it through, but sometimes not. > > Doesn't seem to be a trivial thing to do: > > https://secure.phabricator.com/T7358 > > https://secure.phabricator.com/T5181 > > cheers, > --renato > > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > -...