Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "t6k".
Did you mean:
16k
2019 Oct 05
1
CentOS 8 network-scripts
...Luxury. Try running on a 32k single processor computer, started with
> booting the card reader which read cards that booted from a tape.
>
> ...
Frontpanel, 256 words (12-bit words), and paper tape.? But I also never
had that straight-8 on the net, either, but, via uucp, I did have the
T6K on Usenet.
> No comparison between 50+ years ago with this constantly developing and
> fascinating New World. However KISS remains valid. If it works smoothly,
> don't mess it up.
But that's the point; the previous solution didn't work as smoothly for
all use cases as one...
2015 Apr 24
6
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
I'm sure most people here know about Dash in Debian. Have there
been discussions about providing a more efficient shell in Centos
for use with heavily invoked non-interactive scripts?
With sh being a link to bash in Centos I don't know if it would
explode if the link was changed to something else, but at least
the scripts we made on our own that run certain services could
be changed and
2019 Oct 04
4
CentOS 8 network-scripts
On 10/4/19 10:40 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> My impression is younger generation doesn't value rules that
> programmers were following 2-3 decades ago. One of which is:
>
> Do not make any changes [in the program] unless they are absolutely
> necessary.
>
I have in the past agreed with this assessment more than once.? And I
_am_ somewhat of an old hand at this, having run