Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "t5oimlhgy".
2008 Aug 05
0
[LLVMdev] Anderson's analysis, getresult instruction on x86_64
Hi Prakash,
I think this is highly related to PR2527 [1] and PR2451 [2]. I assume you are
using LLVM 2.3, since current svn automatically replaces getresult with
extractvalue instructions (but doesn't help for Andersen's).
In either case, it seems that Andersen's currently has no ready made way to
indicate a part of a first-class aggregate (or vector), which is the essence
of the
2008 Aug 05
2
[LLVMdev] Anderson's analysis, getresult instruction on x86_64
...gt;
> Matthijs
>
> [1]: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2557
> [2]: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2451
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFImAhXz0nQ5oovr7wRApujAJ0ZtHgcQ4H0fQy3b4icmz/KyPzqdQCgm60q
> YzBoZwlCD26HQ+T5oiMLhGY=
> =uEvB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
-------------- next part ------------...
2008 Aug 05
3
[LLVMdev] Anderson's analysis, getresult instruction on x86_64
Hi,
I was trying to run Anderson's pointer analysis using opt on a 64 bit x86
system (running Ubuntu 8.04) and it seems that the 'getresult' instruction
is not currently handled. When I run the same analysis on the bitcode got by
compiling (using llvm-gcc on a 32 bit machine) on a 32-bit x86 machine, it
runs fine. I was trying to see if it is possible to quickly add a