search for: t48

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20 matches for "t48".

Did you mean: 48
2009 Oct 30
0
Interpreting gnls() output in comparison to nls()
...004 2 0 T0-2 23.6 Naive 3.161247 3 0 T0-3 49.2 Naive 3.895894 4 8 T8-1 20.8 Naive 3.034953 5 8 T8-2 26.9 Naive 3.292126 6 8 T8-3 34.0 Naive 3.526361 7 24 T24-1 36.8 Naive 3.605498 8 24 T24-2 34.0 Naive 3.526361 9 24 T24-3 19.6 Naive 2.975530 10 48 T48-1 55.4 Naive 4.014580 11 48 T48-2 54.2 Naive 3.992681 12 48 T48-3 51.4 Naive 3.939638 13 0 T0-1 342.0 Memory 5.834811 14 0 T0-2 139.0 Memory 4.934474 15 0 T0-3 191.0 Memory 5.252273 16 8 T8-1 104.0 Memory 4.644391 17 8 T8-2 192.0 Memory 5.257495 18 8 T8-3 204.0 Mem...
2019 Dec 09
2
[PATCH] D70246: [InstCombine] remove identity shuffle simplification for mask with undefs
..., i32 undef, i32 undef> %t46 = shufflevector <3 x float> %t44, <3 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 undef, i32 1, i32 undef, i32 undef> %t47 = shufflevector <3 x float> %t44, <3 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 2, i32 undef> %t48 = insertelement <4 x float> %t45, float 1.000000e+00, i32 3 %t49 = shufflevector <4 x float> %t48, <4 x float> %t46, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 5, i32 undef, i32 3> %t50 = shufflevector <4 x float> %t49, <4 x float> %t47, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i3...
2017 Feb 14
2
Ensuring chain dependencies with expansion to libcalls
...h,glue = CopyFromReg t2:1, Register:i64 %reg1, t2:1 t6: i64,ch,glue = CopyFromReg t4:1, Register:i64 %reg2, t4:1 t8: i64,ch,glue = CopyFromReg t6:1, Register:i64 %reg3, t6:1 t46: ch,glue = callseq_start t0, TargetConstant:i32<0> t47: ch,glue = CopyToReg t46, Register:i64 %reg0, t2 t48: ch,glue = CopyToReg t47, Register:i64 %reg1, t4, t47:1 t50: ch,glue = SHAVEISD::CALL t48, TargetExternalSymbol:i32'__divdi3', Register:i64 %reg0, Register:i64 %reg1, RegisterMask:Untyped, t48:1 t51: ch,glue = callseq_end t50, TargetConstant:i32<0>, TargetExternalSymbol:i32'__...
2006 Feb 16
0
factors and contrast matrix
...mputational biology solutions using R and Bioconductor". I know it's a difficult question to answer, but I need all the help I can get. 1. how does one suppose to build the design matrix by knowing what one wants to examine? this is the created matrix in the book: Intercept ES T48 ES:T48 low10-1.cel 1 0 0 0 low10-2.cel 1 0 0 0 high10-1.cel 1 1 0 0 high10-2.cel 1 1 0 0 low48-1.cel 1 0 1 0 low48-2.cel 1 0 1 0 high48-1.cel 1 1 1 1 high48-2.cel 1 1 1 1 attr...
2011 Feb 20
2
concatenate vector after strsplit()
..., c("Focused", "10k", "A12", "t24.tif", "+", "µm"), c("Focused", "10k", "A12", "t36.tif", "+", "µm"), c("Focused", "10k", "A12", "t48.tif", "+", "µm"), c("Focused", "10k", "B12", "t04.tif", "+", "µm"), c("Focused", "10k", "B12", "t08.tif", "+", "µm")) # Test the waters with on...
2018 May 04
0
How to constraint instructions reordering from patterns?
...imm))>; ===== Instruction selection ends: Selected selection DAG: BB#0 '_start:entry' SelectionDAG has 42 nodes: t44: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo TargetConstant:i32<1082130432> t46: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo TargetConstant:i32<1077936128> t48: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo TargetConstant:i32<1073741824> t50: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo TargetConstant:i32<1065353216> t0: ch = EntryToken t3: ch = MOV_SU_iSSs_rspa TargetConstant:i32<64>, t0 t5: ch...
2018 May 04
2
How to constraint instructions reordering from patterns?
...Selected selection DAG: BB#0 '_start:entry' > > SelectionDAG has 42 nodes: > >               t44: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo TargetConstant:i32<1082130432> > >                 t46: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo TargetConstant:i32<1077936128> > >                   t48: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo TargetConstant:i32<1073741824> > > t50: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo TargetConstant:i32<1065353216> > > t0: ch = EntryToken > >                         t3: ch = MOV_SU_iSSs_rspa > TargetConstant:i32<64>, t0 > >                      ...
2018 May 04
2
How to constraint instructions reordering from patterns?
Hi, Is there a kind of scope mechanism in the instruction lowering pattern language in order to control where instructions are inserted or how they are later reordered during the SelectionDiag linearization? I know the glue chain that stick instructions together. But such mechanism in not provided in instruction lowering pattern. I'm facing many situations where some patterns are lowered into
2018 May 04
0
How to constraint instructions reordering from patterns?
...ection DAG: BB#0 '_start:entry' > > SelectionDAG has 42 nodes: > >               t44: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo > TargetConstant:i32<1082130432> > >                 t46: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo > TargetConstant:i32<1077936128> > >                   t48: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo > TargetConstant:i32<1073741824> > > t50: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo TargetConstant:i32<1065353216> > > t0: ch = EntryToken > >                         t3: ch = MOV_SU_iSSs_rspa > TargetConstant:i32<64>, t0 > >                 ...
2017 Jul 10
0
dplyr help
...ike dcast(temp2, minuty~pokus) ? > dput(temp2) structure(list(pokus = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L, 5L, 6L, 6L, 7L, 7L, 8L, 8L ), .Label = c("T42", "T43", "T44", "T45", "T46", "T47", "T48", "T49"), class = "factor"), minuty = structure(c(2L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 3L), .Label = c("180", "240", "300", "360", "420", "480" ), class = "fa...
2017 Oct 13
2
[SelectionDAG] Assertion due to MachineMemOperand flags difference.
...t; t20, t32, t33, undef:i64 t38: i64 = add FrameIndex:i64<0>, Constant:i64<48> t39: ch = store<ST16[%1+48]> t20, t37, t38, undef:i64 t43: i64 = add FrameIndex:i64<0>, Constant:i64<64> t44: ch = store<ST16[%1+64]> t20, t42, t43, undef:i64 t48: i64 = add FrameIndex:i64<0>, Constant:i64<80> t49: ch = store<ST16[%1+80]> t20, t47, t48, undef:i64 t50: ch = TokenFactor t24:1, t25, t28:1, t30, t32:1, t34, t37:1, t39, t42:1, t44, t47:1, t49 t51: i64 = GlobalAddress<void (%class.F*)* @_Z3fn11F> 0 t53: ch,glue =...
2017 Jul 10
4
dplyr help
HI all, Is it possible to use one column spread on multiple columns values. example spread( Key_col, value1:value7) spreading Key_col to variable value1, value2, ....... Value7 Please advise, Kind regards Mangalani Peter Makananisa (5786) South African Revenue Service (SARS) - HO +2782 456 4669 / +2712 422 7357 Please Note: This email and its contents are subject to our email legal notice
2016 Aug 02
2
Instruction selection problems due to SelectionDAGBuilder
...v8i64,ch = load<LD64[ConstantPool]> t0, ConstantPool:i64<<8 x i64> <i64 0, i64 1, i64 2, i64 3, i64 4, i64 5, i64 6, i64 7>> 0, undef:i64 t50: i64 = ConstantPool<<8 x i64> <i64 0, i64 1, i64 2, i64 3, i64 4, i64 5, i64 6, i64 7>> 0 t48: i64 = undef In function: foo The reason is that for the basic-block my back end generates the following Selection DAG: (From 201_LoopVectorize/25_GOOD_map/NEW/6/1/NEW/STDerr3_wo_getSetCCResultType) Initial selection DAG: BB#15 'foo:vector.ph' Selec...
2017 Nov 22
1
mystery "158"
...did not read it correctly. dput(temp2) temp2 <- structure(list(pokus = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L, 5L, 6L, 6L, 7L, 7L, 8L, 8L ), .Label = c("T42", "T43", "T44", "T45", "T46", "T47", "T48", "T49"), class = "factor"), minuty = structure(c(2L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 3L), .Label = c("180", "240", "300", "360", "420", "480" ), class = "fa...
2016 Dec 12
0
TableGen - Help to implement a form of gather/scatter operations for Mips MSA
...it first tries to split it and then gives an error: Split node operand: t13: v128i16,ch = masked_gather<LD256[<unknown>]> t0, t23, t40, TargetConstant:i64<0>, t24 Widen node result 0: t46: v64i16 = extract_subvector t23, Constant:i64<64> Widen node result 0: t48: v64i16,ch = masked_gather<LD128[<unknown>](align=256)> t0, t46, t44, TargetConstant:i64<0>, t26 Split node result: t121: v128i64 = BUILD_VECTOR Constant:i64<0>, Constant:i64<0>, Constant:i64<0>, Constant:i64<0>, Constant:i64<0>, Constant:i64&l...
2017 Nov 21
0
mystery "158"
Your data frame fam contains factors. Turn it into character strings using fam$Family = as.character(fam$Family) and try again. It may be helpful if you read up on R's factors, see ?factor. HTH, Peter On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Glen Forister <gforister at gmail.com> wrote: > This is a simple problem, but a mystery to me. > I'm trying to grab $Family
2016 Dec 15
2
TableGen - Help to implement a form of gather/scatter operations for Mips MSA
...to split it and then gives an error: > Split node operand: t13: v128i16,ch = masked_gather<LD256[<unknown>]> t0, t23, t40, > TargetConstant:i64<0>, t24 > Widen node result 0: t46: v64i16 = extract_subvector t23, Constant:i64<64> > Widen node result 0: t48: v64i16,ch = masked_gather<LD128[<unknown>](align=256)> t0, > t46, t44, TargetConstant:i64<0>, t26 > Split node result: t121: v128i64 = BUILD_VECTOR Constant:i64<0>, Constant:i64<0>, > Constant:i64<0>, Constant:i64<0>, Constant:i64<0>, Co...
2017 Nov 21
2
mystery "158"
This is a simple problem, but a mystery to me. I'm trying to grab $Family "Scelionidae" from one dataframe and put it into another dataframe occupied with NA in $Family. The result is a "158" ends up there instead of Scelionidae. Simply put fam$Family[1] <- least$Family[1] If I have made a mistake here, can somebody point it out. I've included the simple
2016 Dec 11
2
TableGen - Help to implement a form of gather/scatter operations for Mips MSA
Hello. Will, thanks a lot for pointing me to the MaskedGatherSDNode and mgatherv4i32. I have to say that the definition of the "multiclass avx512_gather" from lib/Target/X86/X86InstrAVX512.td is difficult to follow and I prefer not to use it. I currently have some serious problems with TableGen - it gives an assertion failure:
2018 Dec 05
5
[RFC] Matrix support (take 2)
...v4f32 = EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR t26, 4 ; t29: v4f32 = EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR t26, 8 ; t42: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:v4f32 $q0, t27 ; t44: ch,glue = CopyToReg t42, Register:v4f32 $q1, t28, t42:1 ; t46: ch,glue = CopyToReg t44, Register:v4f32 $q2, t29, t44:1 ; t49: ch = AArch64ISD::RET_FLAG t48, Register:v4f32 $q0, Register:v4f32 $q1, Register:v4f32 $q2, Register:v4f32 $q3, t48:1 } =========================== Summary =========================== Based on the feedback and the evaluation, option B seems like a natural first step. It needs some IR extensions (split_vec(N) and align(N) on...