search for: t47

...h,glue = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %reg0 t4: i64,ch,glue = CopyFromReg t2:1, Register:i64 %reg1, t2:1 t6: i64,ch,glue = CopyFromReg t4:1, Register:i64 %reg2, t4:1 t8: i64,ch,glue = CopyFromReg t6:1, Register:i64 %reg3, t6:1 t46: ch,glue = callseq_start t0, TargetConstant:i32<0> t47: ch,glue = CopyToReg t46, Register:i64 %reg0, t2 t48: ch,glue = CopyToReg t47, Register:i64 %reg1, t4, t47:1 t50: ch,glue = SHAVEISD::CALL t48, TargetExternalSymbol:i32'__divdi3', Register:i64 %reg0, Register:i64 %reg1, RegisterMask:Untyped, t48:1 t51: ch,glue = callseq_end t50, Targe...

...nds but different MMO flags is possible, so the Flags should be added to the FoldingSetNodeID. 3) Something else I haven't considered. I have a patch posted implementing 2, but don't know if I should look at fixing 1 as well (or perhaps instead). The loads that trigger the assertion are: t47: v4i32,ch = load<LD16[%0+80](align=8)(dereferenceable)> t20, t46, undef:i64 t69: v4i32,ch = load<LD16[FixedStack1+80](align=8)> t50, t46, undef:i64 I would expect the the second load should also be marked dereferenceable since its loading from one of the TargetFrames. Am I on the right...

...ST4[@x1](tbaa=<0x3dbe418>)> t8, Constant:i32<1065353216>, TargetGlobalAddress:i32<float* @x1> 0, undef:i16 t49: ch = store<Volatile ST4[@x2](tbaa=<0x3dbe418>)> t51, Constant:i32<1073741824>, TargetGlobalAddress:i32<float* @x2> 0, undef:i16 t47: ch = store<Volatile ST4[@x3](tbaa=<0x3dbe418>)> t49, Constant:i32<1077936128>, TargetGlobalAddress:i32<float* @x3> 0, undef:i16 t45: ch = store<Volatile ST4[@x4](tbaa=<0x3dbe418>)> t47, Constant:i32<1082130432>, TargetGlobalAddress:i32<float* @x4&gt...

Hello. Hal, the problem I have is that it doesn't advance at the next available instruction - it always gets the same store. This might be because I did not specify in a file like [Target]Schedule.td the functional units, processor and instruction itineraries. Regarding the Stalls argument to my method [Target]DispatchGroupSBHazardRecognizer::getHazardType() I always get the

...; t8, > Constant:i32<1065353216>, TargetGlobalAddress:i32<float* @x1> 0, undef:i16 > >         t49: ch = store<Volatile ST4[@x2](tbaa=<0x3dbe418>)> t51, > Constant:i32<1073741824>, TargetGlobalAddress:i32<float* @x2> 0, undef:i16 > >       t47: ch = store<Volatile ST4[@x3](tbaa=<0x3dbe418>)> t49, > Constant:i32<1077936128>, TargetGlobalAddress:i32<float* @x3> 0, undef:i16 > >     t45: ch = store<Volatile ST4[@x4](tbaa=<0x3dbe418>)> t47, > Constant:i32<1082130432>, TargetGlobalAddr...

Hi, Is there a kind of scope mechanism in the instruction lowering pattern language in order to control where instructions are inserted or how they are later reordered during the SelectionDiag linearization? I know the glue chain that stick instructions together. But such mechanism in not provided in instruction lowering pattern. I'm facing many situations where some patterns are lowered into

...Constant:i32<1065353216>, TargetGlobalAddress:i32<float* @x1> 0, > undef:i16 > >         t49: ch = store<Volatile ST4[@x2](tbaa=<0x3dbe418>)> t51, > Constant:i32<1073741824>, TargetGlobalAddress:i32<float* @x2> 0, > undef:i16 > >       t47: ch = store<Volatile ST4[@x3](tbaa=<0x3dbe418>)> t49, > Constant:i32<1077936128>, TargetGlobalAddress:i32<float* @x3> 0, > undef:i16 > >     t45: ch = store<Volatile ST4[@x4](tbaa=<0x3dbe418>)> t47, > Constant:i32<1082130432>, TargetGlob...

...??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?#[4] "39\t44\t36\t49\t46"?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?#[5] "42\t45\t47\t49\t37"?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?#[6] "Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie #consequat."???????????????...

...i64<6>, Constant:i64<7> t16: v8i64 = add t7, t15 t43: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %vreg5 t45: i64 = AssertSext t43, ValueType:ch:i8 t46: v8i64 = insert_vector_elt undef:v8i64, t45, Constant:i64<0> t47: v8i64 = vector_shuffle<0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0> t46, undef:v8i64 t55: v8i64 = BUILD_VECTOR Constant:i64<0>, Constant:i64<-1>, Constant:i64<-2>, Constant:i64<-3>, Constant:i64<-4>, Constant:i64<-5>, Constant:i64<-6>, Constant:i64<-7>...

...%t43 to <3 x float> %t45 = shufflevector <3 x float> %t44, <3 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 undef> %t46 = shufflevector <3 x float> %t44, <3 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 undef, i32 1, i32 undef, i32 undef> %t47 = shufflevector <3 x float> %t44, <3 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 2, i32 undef> %t48 = insertelement <4 x float> %t45, float 1.000000e+00, i32 3 %t49 = shufflevector <4 x float> %t48, <4 x float> %t46, <4 x i32> <i32 0,...

Hi something like dcast(temp2, minuty~pokus) ? > dput(temp2) structure(list(pokus = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L, 5L, 6L, 6L, 7L, 7L, 8L, 8L ), .Label = c("T42", "T43", "T44", "T45", "T46", "T47", "T48", "T49"), class = "factor"), minuty = structure(c(2L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 3L), .Label = c("180", "240", "300", "360", "420", "480" ),...

I have a little problem. I realize this may not be the right place to ask this, but I'll bet luke or someone else here knows the answer :-> I'm not the site network administrator, and she's not willing/able to figure out the changes necessary to fix a small problem that cropped up this week: For months my department's PCs have been booting and configuring themselves from the

HI all, Is it possible to use one column spread on multiple columns values. example spread( Key_col, value1:value7) spreading Key_col to variable value1, value2, ....... Value7 Please advise, Kind regards Mangalani Peter Makananisa (5786) South African Revenue Service (SARS) - HO +2782 456 4669 / +2712 422 7357 Please Note: This email and its contents are subject to our email legal notice

...but maybe I only did not read it correctly. dput(temp2) temp2 <- structure(list(pokus = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L, 5L, 6L, 6L, 7L, 7L, 8L, 8L ), .Label = c("T42", "T43", "T44", "T45", "T46", "T47", "T48", "T49"), class = "factor"), minuty = structure(c(2L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 3L), .Label = c("180", "240", "300", "360", "420", "480" ),...

Your data frame fam contains factors. Turn it into character strings using fam$Family = as.character(fam$Family) and try again. It may be helpful if you read up on R's factors, see ?factor. HTH, Peter On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Glen Forister <gforister at gmail.com> wrote: > This is a simple problem, but a mystery to me. > I'm trying to grab $Family

This is a simple problem, but a mystery to me. I'm trying to grab $Family "Scelionidae" from one dataframe and put it into another dataframe occupied with NA in $Family. The result is a "158" ends up there instead of Scelionidae. Simply put fam$Family[1] <- least$Family[1] If I have made a mistake here, can somebody point it out. I've included the simple