search for: t46

...o the FoldingSetNodeID. 3) Something else I haven't considered. I have a patch posted implementing 2, but don't know if I should look at fixing 1 as well (or perhaps instead). The loads that trigger the assertion are: t47: v4i32,ch = load<LD16[%0+80](align=8)(dereferenceable)> t20, t46, undef:i64 t69: v4i32,ch = load<LD16[FixedStack1+80](align=8)> t50, t46, undef:i64 I would expect the the second load should also be marked dereferenceable since its loading from one of the TargetFrames. Am I on the right track here? Thanks Sean -------------- next part -------------- Initi...

...expanded to a call sequence: t0: ch = EntryToken t2: i64,ch,glue = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %reg0 t4: i64,ch,glue = CopyFromReg t2:1, Register:i64 %reg1, t2:1 t6: i64,ch,glue = CopyFromReg t4:1, Register:i64 %reg2, t4:1 t8: i64,ch,glue = CopyFromReg t6:1, Register:i64 %reg3, t6:1 t46: ch,glue = callseq_start t0, TargetConstant:i32<0> t47: ch,glue = CopyToReg t46, Register:i64 %reg0, t2 t48: ch,glue = CopyToReg t47, Register:i64 %reg1, t4, t47:1 t50: ch,glue = SHAVEISD::CALL t48, TargetExternalSymbol:i32'__divdi3', Register:i64 %reg0, Register:i64 %reg1, Regi...

...??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? # [3] "38\t43\t39\t44\t45"?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?#[4] "39\t44\t36\t49\t46"?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?#[5] "42\t45\t47\t49\t37"??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????...

...gt;, Constant:i64<3>, Constant:i64<4>, Constant:i64<5>, Constant:i64<6>, Constant:i64<7> t16: v8i64 = add t7, t15 t43: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %vreg5 t45: i64 = AssertSext t43, ValueType:ch:i8 t46: v8i64 = insert_vector_elt undef:v8i64, t45, Constant:i64<0> t47: v8i64 = vector_shuffle<0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0> t46, undef:v8i64 t55: v8i64 = BUILD_VECTOR Constant:i64<0>, Constant:i64<-1>, Constant:i64<-2>, Constant:i64<-3>, Constant:i64<...

...%t32, <4 x float>* %t24) { .entry: %t43 = insertelement <3 x i32> undef, i32 %t32, i32 2 %t44 = bitcast <3 x i32> %t43 to <3 x float> %t45 = shufflevector <3 x float> %t44, <3 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 undef> %t46 = shufflevector <3 x float> %t44, <3 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 undef, i32 1, i32 undef, i32 undef> %t47 = shufflevector <3 x float> %t44, <3 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 2, i32 undef> %t48 = insertelement <4 x float...

...: Pat<(i32 imm:$imm), (MOVSUTO_A_iSLo (trunc_imm i32:$imm))>; ===== Instruction selection ends: Selected selection DAG: BB#0 '_start:entry' SelectionDAG has 42 nodes: t44: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo TargetConstant:i32<1082130432> t46: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo TargetConstant:i32<1077936128> t48: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo TargetConstant:i32<1073741824> t50: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo TargetConstant:i32<1065353216> t0: ch = EntryToken t3: ch...

...TO_A_iSLo (trunc_imm i32:$imm))>; > > ===== Instruction selection ends: > > Selected selection DAG: BB#0 '_start:entry' > > SelectionDAG has 42 nodes: > >               t44: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo TargetConstant:i32<1082130432> > >                 t46: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo TargetConstant:i32<1077936128> > >                   t48: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo TargetConstant:i32<1073741824> > > t50: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo TargetConstant:i32<1065353216> > > t0: ch = EntryToken > >                         t3: ch...

Hi, Is there a kind of scope mechanism in the instruction lowering pattern language in order to control where instructions are inserted or how they are later reordered during the SelectionDiag linearization? I know the glue chain that stick instructions together. But such mechanism in not provided in instruction lowering pattern. I'm facing many situations where some patterns are lowered into

...another problem: llc fails when trying to select my masked_gather node. More exactly, it first tries to split it and then gives an error: Split node operand: t13: v128i16,ch = masked_gather<LD256[<unknown>]> t0, t23, t40, TargetConstant:i64<0>, t24 Widen node result 0: t46: v64i16 = extract_subvector t23, Constant:i64<64> Widen node result 0: t48: v64i16,ch = masked_gather<LD128[<unknown>](align=256)> t0, t46, t44, TargetConstant:i64<0>, t26 Split node result: t121: v128i64 = BUILD_VECTOR Constant:i64<0>, Constant:i64<0>...

...SLo (trunc_imm i32:$imm))>; > > ===== Instruction selection ends: > > Selected selection DAG: BB#0 '_start:entry' > > SelectionDAG has 42 nodes: > >               t44: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo > TargetConstant:i32<1082130432> > >                 t46: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo > TargetConstant:i32<1077936128> > >                   t48: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo > TargetConstant:i32<1073741824> > > t50: i32 = MOVSUTO_A_iSLo TargetConstant:i32<1065353216> > > t0: ch = EntryToken > >                   ...

Hi something like dcast(temp2, minuty~pokus) ? > dput(temp2) structure(list(pokus = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L, 5L, 6L, 6L, 7L, 7L, 8L, 8L ), .Label = c("T42", "T43", "T44", "T45", "T46", "T47", "T48", "T49"), class = "factor"), minuty = structure(c(2L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 3L), .Label = c("180", "240", "300", "360", "420", &...

I was surprised to see that this hadn't made it to the samba list yet. Note I have not spent any time trying to confirm validity. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 00:21:55 +0200 From: root <root@ADM.KIX-AZZ.ORG> To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG /* ___ ______ _ _ / \ | _ \ | \ / |

...llc fails when trying to select my > masked_gather node. More exactly, it first tries to split it and then gives an error: > Split node operand: t13: v128i16,ch = masked_gather<LD256[<unknown>]> t0, t23, t40, > TargetConstant:i64<0>, t24 > Widen node result 0: t46: v64i16 = extract_subvector t23, Constant:i64<64> > Widen node result 0: t48: v64i16,ch = masked_gather<LD128[<unknown>](align=256)> t0, > t46, t44, TargetConstant:i64<0>, t26 > Split node result: t121: v128i64 = BUILD_VECTOR Constant:i64<0>, Constant:...

Hello. Will, thanks a lot for pointing me to the MaskedGatherSDNode and mgatherv4i32. I have to say that the definition of the "multiclass avx512_gather" from lib/Target/X86/X86InstrAVX512.td is difficult to follow and I prefer not to use it. I currently have some serious problems with TableGen - it gives an assertion failure:

I have a little problem. I realize this may not be the right place to ask this, but I'll bet luke or someone else here knows the answer :-> I'm not the site network administrator, and she's not willing/able to figure out the changes necessary to fix a small problem that cropped up this week: For months my department's PCs have been booting and configuring themselves from the

HI all, Is it possible to use one column spread on multiple columns values. example spread( Key_col, value1:value7) spreading Key_col to variable value1, value2, ....... Value7 Please advise, Kind regards Mangalani Peter Makananisa (5786) South African Revenue Service (SARS) - HO +2782 456 4669 / +2712 422 7357 Please Note: This email and its contents are subject to our email legal notice

...is in help pages but maybe I only did not read it correctly. dput(temp2) temp2 <- structure(list(pokus = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L, 5L, 6L, 6L, 7L, 7L, 8L, 8L ), .Label = c("T42", "T43", "T44", "T45", "T46", "T47", "T48", "T49"), class = "factor"), minuty = structure(c(2L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 3L, 2L, 3L), .Label = c("180", "240", "300", "360", "420", &...

Your data frame fam contains factors. Turn it into character strings using fam$Family = as.character(fam$Family) and try again. It may be helpful if you read up on R's factors, see ?factor. HTH, Peter On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Glen Forister <gforister at gmail.com> wrote: > This is a simple problem, but a mystery to me. > I'm trying to grab $Family

This is a simple problem, but a mystery to me. I'm trying to grab $Family "Scelionidae" from one dataframe and put it into another dataframe occupied with NA in $Family. The result is a "158" ends up there instead of Scelionidae. Simply put fam$Family[1] <- least$Family[1] If I have made a mistake here, can somebody point it out. I've included the simple

...25 ret <12 x float> %c ;----------- ; t27: v4f32 = EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR t26, 0 ; t28: v4f32 = EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR t26, 4 ; t29: v4f32 = EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR t26, 8 ; t42: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:v4f32 $q0, t27 ; t44: ch,glue = CopyToReg t42, Register:v4f32 $q1, t28, t42:1 ; t46: ch,glue = CopyToReg t44, Register:v4f32 $q2, t29, t44:1 ; t49: ch = AArch64ISD::RET_FLAG t48, Register:v4f32 $q0, Register:v4f32 $q1, Register:v4f32 $q2, Register:v4f32 $q3, t48:1 } =========================== Summary =========================== Based on the feedback and the evaluation, opt...