search for: t35

...ress<float (float, float, float, float)* @fdivfaddfmul_a> 0 t29: ch,glue = callseq_start t26:1, TargetConstant:i16<4> t31: ch,glue = CLPISD::COPY_TO_CALLEE_A t29, t23, FrameIndex:i16<0>, t29:1 t33: ch,glue = CLPISD::COPY_TO_CALLEE_A t31, t24, FrameIndex:i16<1>, t31:1 t35: ch,glue = CLPISD::COPY_TO_CALLEE_A t33, t25, FrameIndex:i16<2>, t33:1 t37: ch,glue = CLPISD::COPY_TO_CALLEE_A t35, t26, FrameIndex:i16<3>, t35:1 t39: ch,glue = CLPISD::CALLSEQ t37, TargetGlobalAddress:i16<float (float, float, float, float)* @fdivfaddfmul_a> 0, t37:1 t41: ch...

...gt; 0 > >   t29: ch,glue = callseq_start t26:1, TargetConstant:i16<4> > >   t31: ch,glue = CLPISD::COPY_TO_CALLEE_A t29, t23, FrameIndex:i16<0>, > t29:1 > >   t33: ch,glue = CLPISD::COPY_TO_CALLEE_A t31, t24, FrameIndex:i16<1>, > t31:1 > >   t35: ch,glue = CLPISD::COPY_TO_CALLEE_A t33, t25, FrameIndex:i16<2>, > t33:1 > >   t37: ch,glue = CLPISD::COPY_TO_CALLEE_A t35, t26, FrameIndex:i16<3>, > t35:1 > >   t39: ch,glue = CLPISD::CALLSEQ t37, TargetGlobalAddress:i16<float > (float, float, float, floa...

Hi, Is there a kind of scope mechanism in the instruction lowering pattern language in order to control where instructions are inserted or how they are later reordered during the SelectionDiag linearization? I know the glue chain that stick instructions together. But such mechanism in not provided in instruction lowering pattern. I'm facing many situations where some patterns are lowered into

...>   t29: ch,glue = callseq_start t26:1, TargetConstant:i16<4> > >   t31: ch,glue = CLPISD::COPY_TO_CALLEE_A t29, t23, > FrameIndex:i16<0>, > t29:1 > >   t33: ch,glue = CLPISD::COPY_TO_CALLEE_A t31, t24, > FrameIndex:i16<1>, > t31:1 > >   t35: ch,glue = CLPISD::COPY_TO_CALLEE_A t33, t25, > FrameIndex:i16<2>, > t33:1 > >   t37: ch,glue = CLPISD::COPY_TO_CALLEE_A t35, t26, > FrameIndex:i16<3>, > t35:1 > >   t39: ch,glue = CLPISD::CALLSEQ t37, TargetGlobalAddress:i16<float > (float, float, f...

...q:ch t25: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg396 t28: i1 = setcc t25, Constant:i32<255>, setugt:ch t29: i1 = and t23, t28 t37: i1 = setcc t29, Constant:i1<-1>, setne:ch t33: ch = brcond t16, t37, BasicBlock:ch<if.end65.1 0x7097330> t35: ch = br t33, BasicBlock:ch<if.then64.1 0x7097280> Here we see that the settcc has been legalized to xor, which I am fine with.. Legalizing: t37: i1 = setcc t29, Constant:i1<-1>, setne:ch Combining: t37: i1 = setcc t29, Constant:i1<-1>, setne:ch ... into: t38: i1 = xor t29, Con...

..., Register:i32 %vreg396 >> t28: i1 = setcc t25, Constant:i32<255>, setugt:ch >> t29: i1 = and t23, t28 >> t37: i1 = setcc t29, Constant:i1<-1>, setne:ch >> t33: ch = brcond t16, t37, BasicBlock:ch<if.end65.1 0x7097330> >> t35: ch = br t33, BasicBlock:ch<if.then64.1 0x7097280> >> Here we see that the settcc has been legalized to xor, which I am fine with.. >> Legalizing: t37: i1 = setcc t29, Constant:i1<-1>, setne:ch >> >> Combining: t37: i1 = setcc t29, Constant:i1<-1>, setne:c...

...a5f8c98> The Optimized lowered selection DAG does not contain the* AND* node, but it does have a truncate which would seem to stand in for it given the result is only 1bit wide and the xor following it is operating on 1-bit wide values: t22: i8 = srl t19, Constant:i64<1> t35: i1 = truncate t22 t29: i1 = xor t35, Constant:i1<-1> t31: ch = brcond t18, t29, BasicBlock:ch<if.else 0xa5f8d48> t33: ch = br t31, BasicBlock:ch<if.then 0xa5f8c98> Next we get to the Type-legalized selection DAG: t22: i8 = srl t19, Constant:i64<1>...

...ized lowered selection DAG does not contain the*AND* node, > but it does have a truncate which would seem to stand in for it given > the result is only 1bit wide and the xor following it is operating on > 1-bit wide values: > > t22: i8 = srl t19, Constant:i64<1> > t35: i1 = truncate t22 > t29: i1 = xor t35, Constant:i1<-1> > t31: ch = brcond t18, t29, BasicBlock:ch<if.else 0xa5f8d48> > t33: ch = br t31, BasicBlock:ch<if.then 0xa5f8c98> > > Next we get to the Type-legalized selection DAG: > > t22: i8 = sr...

...l by storing it on a temporary register. This is found before the doSmth function call, t30: i16 = CMPkr16 t4, TargetConstant:i16<0> t36: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i16 $sr, t30 t32: i16 = NEGSETCC TargetConstant:i16<4>, t36:1 And this is generated after the call t35: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i16 $sr, t30 t31: i16 = SELCC t19, t18, TargetConstant:i16<4>, t35:1 t21: ch,glue = CopyToReg t18:1, Register:i16 $r0, t31 NEGSETCC and SELCC are genuine instructions of my target architecture, they use the SR along with operands to produce a result....

...gress_alert = 8 tunneling=none 11:27:28:163 Trace File: /var/log/asterisk/h323_log 11:27:28:163 FastStart - enabled 11:27:28:163 H245 Tunneling - enabled 11:27:28:163 MediaWaitForConnect - disabled 11:27:28:163 AutoAnswer - disabled 11:27:28:163 Terminal Type - 50 11:27:28:163 T35 CountryCode - 1 11:27:28:164 T35 Extension - 0 11:27:28:164 Manufacturer Code - 71 11:27:28:164 ProductID - objsys 11:27:28:164 VersionID - v0.8.3 11:27:28:164 Local signalling IP address - 10.4.16.45 11:27:28:164 H225 ListenPort - 1720 11:27:28:164 CallerID - Asterisk 11:27:28...

...ead.delim2("test") Error in read.table(file = file, header = header, sep = sep, quote = quote, : more columns than column names When I try fits=readLines("test") it reads the data, but doesn't separate it into values: > head(fits) [1] "1\t30049\t30204\tsegment_4\t35\t." [2] "bp\t30049\t30065\t30071\t30114\t30119\t30121\t30126\t30130\t30132\t30134\t30137\t30146\t30151\t30165\t30174\t30204\t"...

...8i64 t32: v8i64 = BUILD_VECTOR Constant:i64<0>, Constant:i64<-1>, Constant:i64<-2>, Constant:i64<-3>, Constant:i64<-4>, Constant:i64<-5>, Constant:i64<-6>, Constant:i64<-7> t33: v8i64 = add t24, t32 t35: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:v8i64 %vreg17, t33 t37: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 %vreg117, Constant:i64<0> t39: ch = TokenFactor t18, t35, t37 t40: ch = br t39, BasicBlock:ch<vector.body25 0x1d07660> However, when using the mips64 back en...

...found before the doSmth function call, > > t30: i16 = CMPkr16 t4, TargetConstant:i16<0> > t36: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i16 $sr, t30 > t32: i16 = NEGSETCC TargetConstant:i16<4>, t36:1 > > > And this is generated after the call > > t35: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i16 $sr, t30 > t31: i16 = SELCC t19, t18, TargetConstant:i16<4>, t35:1 > t21: ch,glue = CopyToReg t18:1, Register:i16 $r0, t31 > > NEGSETCC and SELCC are genuine instructions of my target architecture, they use the SR along with operands t...

...wered selection DAG does not contain the* AND* node, but > it does have a truncate which would seem to stand in for it given the > result is only 1bit wide and the xor following it is operating on 1-bit > wide values: > > t22: i8 = srl t19, Constant:i64<1> > t35: i1 = truncate t22 > t29: i1 = xor t35, Constant:i1<-1> > t31: ch = brcond t18, t29, BasicBlock:ch<if.else 0xa5f8d48> > t33: ch = br t31, BasicBlock:ch<if.then 0xa5f8c98> > > Next we get to the Type-legalized selection DAG: > > t22: i8 = sr...

...nt Configuration is as follows: 09:53:08:742 Trace File: /var/log/asterisk/h323_log 09:53:08:742 FastStart - enabled 09:53:08:742 H245 Tunneling - enabled 09:53:08:742 MediaWaitForConnect - disabled 09:53:08:742 AutoAnswer - disabled 09:53:08:742 Terminal Type - 50 09:53:08:742 T35 CountryCode - 1 09:53:08:742 T35 Extension - 0 09:53:08:742 Manufacturer Code - 71 09:53:08:742 ProductID - objsys 09:53:08:742 VersionID - v0.8.2 09:53:08:742 Local signalling IP address - 0.0.0.0 09:53:08:742 H225 ListenPort - 1720 09:53:08:743 CallerID - ASTERISK 09:53:08:74...

I attempt to optimize the use of the ‘CMP’ instruction on my architecture by removing the instruction instances where the Status Register already had the correct status flags. The cmp instruction in my architecture is the typical one that compares two registers, or a register with an immediate, and sets the Status Flags accordingly. I implemented my ‘cmp’ instruction in LLVM by custom lowering

<div> </div><div><div><p>Carry-less multiplication[1] instructions exist (at least optionally) on many architectures: armv8, RISC-V, x86_64, POWER, SPARC, C64x, and possibly more.</p><p>This proposal is to add a <code>llvm.clmul</code> instruction. Or if that is contentious, <code>llvm.experimental.bitmanip.clmul</code> instruction.

I''m not sure if this is a problem with the iscsitarget or zfs. I''d greatly appreciate it if it gets moved to the proper list. Well I''m just about out of ideas on what might be wrong.. Quick history: I installed OS 2008.05 when it was SNV_86 to try out ZFS with VMWare. Found out that multilun''s were being treated as multipaths so waited till SNV_94 came out to