search for: t2xtpk

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "t2xtpk".

2011 Aug 30
2
[LLVMdev] ARMCodeEmitter.cpp JIT support very broken (2.9 and svn)
...pidly maturing is generally passable for static encoding, but the MCJIT is still in its infancy. I was relying on this support in LLVM 2.8, and while it is definitely incomplete, it does work if you don't depend on certain features. I found it worked adequately as long as you set the -thumb2,-t2xtpk attributes. It would be nice if at least it didn't get further broken until the MC Emitter was fully ready to take its place. The first FIXME comment in ARMCodeEmitter seems to indicate this is a goal.: "… They are placeholders to allow this encoder to continue to function until the MC...
2011 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] ARMCodeEmitter.cpp JIT support very broken (2.9 and svn)
...pidly maturing is generally passable for static encoding, but the MCJIT is still in its infancy. I was relying on this support in LLVM 2.8, and while it is definitely incomplete, it does work if you don't depend on certain features. I found it worked adequately as long as you set the -thumb2,-t2xtpk attributes. It would be nice if at least it didn't get further broken until the MC Emitter was fully ready to take its place. The first FIXME comment in ARMCodeEmitter seems to indicate this is a goal.: "… They are placeholders to allow this encoder to continue to function until the MC...
2011 Aug 30
0
[LLVMdev] ARMCodeEmitter.cpp JIT support very broken (2.9 and svn)
Craig, On Aug 30, 2011, at 12:51 PM, Craig Smith wrote: > I recently tried to update from LLVM 2.8 and 2.9 and ran into several bad issues with JIT support on ARM. > I ran into several distinct issues so far, and there are probably others. (None of these problems appear to be fixed in the current svn head either as far as I can tell.) The non-MC-based ARM JIT path is known not to work,
2011 Aug 30
2
[LLVMdev] ARMCodeEmitter.cpp JIT support very broken (2.9 and svn)
I recently tried to update from LLVM 2.8 and 2.9 and ran into several bad issues with JIT support on ARM. I ran into several distinct issues so far, and there are probably others. (None of these problems appear to be fixed in the current svn head either as far as I can tell.) 1) VFP/Neon instructions don't encode correctly at al, because the encoding methods generated by tablegen for them
2011 Aug 30
5
[LLVMdev] ARMCodeEmitter.cpp JIT support very broken (2.9 and svn)
...ring is generally passable for static encoding, but the MCJIT is still in its infancy. > > I was relying on this support in LLVM 2.8, and while it is definitely incomplete, it does work if you don't depend on certain features. I found it worked adequately as long as you set the -thumb2,-t2xtpk attributes. > > It would be nice if at least it didn't get further broken until the MC Emitter was fully ready to take its place. The first FIXME comment in ARMCodeEmitter seems to indicate this is a goal.: "… They are placeholders to allow this encoder to continue to function unt...