Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "t2b".
Did you mean:
2b
2008 May 28
4
Help on Calculating day differences
Hello R Freaks,
I calculate the difference in days between two events with the following
litte R expresseion:
T1a <- strptime(T1,"%m/%d/%y %H:%M:%S");
T2a <- strptime(T2,"%m/%d/%y %H:%M:%S");
T1b <- as.Date(T1a);
T2b <- as.Date(T2a);
days <- T2b-T1b;
time <- T2a - T1a;
In the project I would like to calculate only working day.
I the a possibility to count on woring days without weekends?
Is it maybe also possible to skip in addition the national holiday dates?
Thanks a lit for your help
Thorsten
M...
2012 May 15
1
vector w/o arithmetic addition for boxplot
..., t4O.
class(t1W) produces "numeric" (1000 observations of 1's and 0's)
To create the box plot I am using
boxplot(residuals(IRR)~ treatRace_clean)
where I have tried treatRace_clean as both of the following
treatRace_clean <- as.factor(as.vector(t1W + t1B + t1H + t1O + t2W + t2B +
t2H + t2O + t3W + t3B +
t3H + t3O + t4W + t4B + t4H + t4O))
treatRace_clean <- as.vector(c(t1W, t1B ,t1H ,t1O, t2W , t2B ,t2H ,t2O ,t3W
, t3B,
t3H + t3O , t4W , t4B , t4H , t4O))
However, I continue to get this error code:
Error: $ operator is invalid for atomic vectors
Thoughts?
--
Vie...
2011 May 24
1
Loading an S object into R
...? ? ? ? K [ c g d` a? ?? ?? (? -? ?? ?? ;? ?? G? ?? ?? ?? ?? ? ? ? ?? %? ? ?& ?) ?,
.Data .Names
?
???1??1o`k???E??:?????28q|??9V
9`???7?C?%???KI????????Bt0??K#4????\??_????d?}?e?????=6???p PREOP.PSA PREOP.PSA' T.STG=T2A T.STG=T2B T.STG=T2C T.STG=T3 G1=> 3 G2=> 3 BX.POS BX.NEG RP.YEAR G1=> 3 * G2=> 3 .Data .Dim .Dimnames ? ? = E 6??w??a??_?JM
g???j???E???rV?>???
T??>WD?Ow:??
...
SA?;_ws6?@?(??Lp@????QEF??VU9X?f??????[????'??T????-?91???F????K???'???P?<?Jf???P
(?;_ws6?@?%??...
2007 Dec 18
1
System hangs up every day
...ns.
I assume the cause of the problem consists in many number of TCP/IP connections that torrent client establishes.
Any ideas?
Maybe I can tune somehow a TCP/IP via kernel, sysctl or pf settings?
> There is one FreeBSD server in our company. The server platform is: Supermicro SuperServer 6014V-T2B (2x Intel > Xeon 2.8, 1Gb RAM, 3WARE 3W-8006-2LP RAID-Controller).
> The server works as:
> - a gateway between LAN and Internet
> - an Intranet web- and database server (Apache + MySQL + PHP)
> - a firewall (OpenBSD pf)
> - a transparent proxy server (Squid)
> A mounthly traff...
2017 Nov 11
2
Update control flow graph when splitting a machine basic block?
...ef %cpsr, debug-location !32
t2IT 11, 28, implicit-def %itstate
%r0 = tMOVi8 _, 1, 11, %cpsr, implicit %r0, implicit %itstate
tPOP_RET 11, %cpsr, def %r4, def %r6, def %r7, def %pc, implicit %r0, implicit %r4, implicit killed %itstate, debug-location !44
%r1 = t2MOVi 2, 14, _, _
t2B %bb.3.for.body, 14, _
Note that a terminator tPOP_RET is before a non-terminator t2MOVi.
The command line to produce this is as follows:
llc -mtriple=thumbv7m-none-none-eabi -mcpu=cortex-m3 -O1 -stop-before=arm-cp-islands -o prime-factorize.mir prime-factorize.ll
Attached are the input file prim...
2004 Sep 03
3
getting up and running
Hello, I have read the getting started guides, FAQ, etc, so if your
response to the following is RTFM, please at least refer me to the
appropriate one :)
I have shorewall set up as follows:
zones:
net Net Internet
loc Local Local networks
dmz DMZ Demilitarized zone
policies:
loc net ACCEPT
dmz net
2017 Nov 11
2
Update control flow graph when splitting a machine basic block?
> The right way to update the CFG very much depends on how you're
> transforming it.
I would like to export the CFG for control flow checking.
Theoretically, it should be possible for a compiler to know every target of every control flow instruction, except for computed targets that are not known at compile-time.
When a machine basic block is split between two branches, as shown below:
2015 Jan 11
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] [PATCH] add tail call optimization to thumb1-only targets
...nSizeAttr = MF.getFunction()->getAttributes().hasAttribute(
@@ -2000,26 +2031,6 @@
if (isCalleeStructRet || isCallerStructRet)
return false;
- // FIXME: Completely disable sibcall for Thumb1 since Thumb1RegisterInfo::
- // emitEpilogue is not ready for them. Thumb tail calls also use t2B, as
- // the Thumb1 16-bit unconditional branch doesn't have sufficient relocation
- // support in the assembler and linker to be used. This would need to be
- // fixed to fully support tail calls in Thumb1.
- //
- // Doing this is tricky, since the LDM/POP instruction on Thumb doesn't...