search for: t2390

...SMBus Controller (rev 03) 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8055 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 14) 06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR242x 802.11abg Wireless PCI Express Adapter (rev 04) model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU T2390 @ 1.86GHz MemTotal: 2066004 kB Could you give me some advice how to fix suspend\resume ? Thanks

On 03/19/2013 11:02 AM, Star Tan wrote: > > Dear Tobias Grosser, > > Today I have rebuilt the LLVM-Polly in Release mode. The configuration of my own testing machine is: Intel Pentium Dual CPU T2390(1.86GHz) with 2GB DDR2 memory. > I evaluated the Polly using PolyBench and Mediabench. It takes too long time to evaluate the whole LLVM-testsuite, so I just choose the Mediabench from LLVM-testsuite. OK. This is a good baseline. > The preliminary results of Polly compiling overhead is list...

I am informed that it is possible to load iTunes in Wine using Ubuntu 9.04 but am experiencing problems. In Ubuntu I downloaded the Wine package via Synaptic which duly displayed in my applications menu. Having achieved that I then loaded iTunes the version for XP and Vista. When I attempt to open the iTunes it is then that I hit problems. The iTunes .exe file is now on my desktop. On opening

Dear Tobias Grosser, Today I have rebuilt the LLVM-Polly in Release mode. The configuration of my own testing machine is: Intel Pentium Dual CPU T2390(1.86GHz) with 2GB DDR2 memory. I evaluated the Polly using PolyBench and Mediabench. It takes too long time to evaluate the whole LLVM-testsuite, so I just choose the Mediabench from LLVM-testsuite. The preliminary results of Polly compiling overhead is listed as follows: Table 1: Compiling t...

Dear Tobias Grosser, Thank you so much for your kind reply. Your advice is very helpful and inspiring. At 2013-03-18 20:40:50,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 03/17/2013 11:54 PM, Star Tan wrote: >> Hello Tobi, >> >> I am interested in Polly project. Polly seems to be a very promising tool to find out program parallelization based on LLVM

...Star Tan CC: llvmdev Subject: Re: [Polly]GSoC Proposal: Reducing LLVM-Polly Compiling overhead On 03/19/2013 11:02 AM, Star Tan wrote: > > Dear Tobias Grosser, > > Today I have rebuilt the LLVM-Polly in Release mode. The configuration of my own testing machine is: Intel Pentium Dual CPU T2390(1.86GHz) with 2GB DDR2 memory. > I evaluated the Polly using PolyBench and Mediabench. It takes too long time to evaluate the whole LLVM-testsuite, so I just choose the Mediabench from LLVM-testsuite. OK. This is a good baseline. > The preliminary results of Polly compiling overhead is list...

...anonicalize the SCEVs we analyse as the current way the SCEV are canonicalized makes Polly introduce different parameters for expressions {p + 1, +, 1}_<l> and {p + 2, +, 1}_<l> in case the loop 'l' is not part of the scop. > Our evaluation is based on Intel Pentium Dual CPU T2390(1.86GHz) with > 2GB DDR2 memory. Each benchmark is run multiple times and data are > collected using ministat (https://github.com/codahale/ministat). > Polly is built with Cloog in Release+Assert mode. All Polly, LLVM and > Cloog source code are checked out from SVN at April 24, 2013....

Dear Tobias, Thank you very much for your very helpful advice. Yes, -debug-pass and -time-passes are two very useful and powerful options when evaluating the compile-time of each compiler pass. They are exactly what I need! With these options, I can step into details of the compile-time overhead of each pass. I have finished some preliminary testing based on two randomly selected files from

On 04/30/2013 04:13 PM, Star Tan wrote: > Hi all, [...] > How could I find out where the time is spent on between two adjacent Polly passes? Can anyone give me some advice? Hi Star Tan, I propose to do the performance analysis using the 'opt' tool and optimizing LLVM-IR, instead of running it from within clang. For the 'opt' tool there are two commands that should help

...nabling Polly we can significantly optimizing the polybench benchmarks, while at the same time no prohibitively large compile time increase can be seen for mediabench. Reaching this goal would be a great step forward. > [Attachments] > > Our evaluation is based on Intel Pentium Dual CPU T2390(1.86GHz) with > 2GB DDR2 memory. Each benchmark is run multiple times and data are > collected using ministat (https://github.com/codahale/ministat). Results > are shown in table 1 and table 2. Five cases are tested: (alias > pollycc="clang -O3 -load LLVMPolly.so -mllvm -polly) *c...

...s we analyse as the current way the SCEV are >canonicalized makes Polly introduce different parameters for expressions >{p + 1, +, 1}_<l> and {p + 2, +, 1}_<l> in case the loop 'l' is not part >of the scop. > >> Our evaluation is based on Intel Pentium Dual CPU T2390(1.86GHz) with >> 2GB DDR2 memory. Each benchmark is run multiple times and data are >> collected using ministat (https://github.com/codahale/ministat). >> Polly is built with Cloog in Release+Assert mode. All Polly, LLVM and >> Cloog source code are checked out from SVN at A...

Hi all, I have updated my GSoS proposal: "FastPolly: Reducing LLVM-Polly Compiling overhead" (https://gist.github.com/tanstar/5441808). I think the pass ordering problem you discussed early can be also investigated in this project! Is there any comment or advice about my proposal? I appreciate all your help and advice. Thanks, Star Tan Proposal:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92306 Bug ID: 92306 Summary: GL Excess demo renders incorrectly on nv43 Product: Mesa Version: git Hardware: x86 (IA32) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau Assignee: nouveau