search for: t1x

This arose in testing [.terms and has me confused. data(esoph)?? # use a standard data set t0x <- terms(model.frame( ~ tobgp, data=esoph)) t1 <-? terms(model.frame(ncases ~ agegp + tobgp, data=esoph)) t1x <- (delete.response(t1))[-1] > all.equal(t0x, t1x) [1] TRUE # the above is wrong, because they actually are not the same > all.equal(attr(t0x, 'dataClasses'), attr(t1x, 'dataClasses')) [1] "Names: 1 string mismatch" [2] "Lengths (1, 2) differ (string com...

On 05/04/2019 10:19 a.m., Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote: > Duncan, > ? I should have included it in my original note, but > > ?? ? all.equal(unclass(t0x), unclass(t1x)) > > returns TRUE as well.? I had tried that as well. ? But a further look at > all.equal.default shows the following line right near the top: > ??? if (is.language(target) || is.function(target)) > ??????? return(all.equal.language(target, current, ...)) > > and that pat...

...ry M., Ph.D. wrote: > > > On 4/5/19 9:39 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: >> On 05/04/2019 10:19 a.m., Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote: >>> Duncan, >>> ?? I should have included it in my original note, but >>> >>> ??? ? all.equal(unclass(t0x), unclass(t1x)) >>> >>> returns TRUE as well.? I had tried that as well. ? But a further look at >>> all.equal.default shows the following line right near the top: >>> ???? if (is.language(target) || is.function(target)) >>> ???????? return(all.equal.language(target...

...9:03 a.m., Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel wrote: > This arose in testing [.terms and has me confused. > > data(esoph)?? # use a standard data set > > t0x <- terms(model.frame( ~ tobgp, data=esoph)) > t1 <-? terms(model.frame(ncases ~ agegp + tobgp, data=esoph)) > t1x <- (delete.response(t1))[-1] > > > all.equal(t0x, t1x) > [1] TRUE > > # the above is wrong, because they actually are not the same > > > all.equal(attr(t0x, 'dataClasses'), attr(t1x, 'dataClasses')) > [1] "Names: 1 string mismatch" &...

...4/5/19 9:39 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: >>> On 05/04/2019 10:19 a.m., Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote: >>>> Duncan, >>>> ?? I should have included it in my original note, but >>>> >>>> ??? ? all.equal(unclass(t0x), unclass(t1x)) >>>> >>>> returns TRUE as well.? I had tried that as well. ? But a further look at >>>> all.equal.default shows the following line right near the top: >>>> ???? if (is.language(target) || is.function(target)) >>>> ??...

...ch wrote: > >>> On 05/04/2019 10:19 a.m., Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote: > >>>> Duncan, > >>>> ?? I should have included it in my original note, but > >>>> > >>>> ??? ? all.equal(unclass(t0x), unclass(t1x)) > >>>> > >>>> returns TRUE as well.? I had tried that as well. ? But a further look at > >>>> all.equal.default shows the following line right near the top: > >>>> ???? if (is.language(target) || is.function(target))...

...it a/arch/x86/crypto/glue_helper-asm-avx2.S b/arch/x86/crypto/glue_helper-asm-avx2.S index a53ac11dd385..e04c80467bd2 100644 --- a/arch/x86/crypto/glue_helper-asm-avx2.S +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/glue_helper-asm-avx2.S @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ vmovdqu (iv), t2x; \ vmovdqa t2x, t3x; \ inc_le128(t2x, t0x, t1x); \ - vbroadcasti128 bswap, t1; \ + vbroadcasti128 bswap(%rip), t1; \ vinserti128 $1, t2x, t3, t2; /* ab: le0 ; cd: le1 */ \ vpshufb t1, t2, x0; \ \ @@ -124,13 +124,13 @@ tivx, t0, t0x, t1, t1x, t2, t2x, t3, \ xts_gf128mul_and_shl1_mask_0, \ xts_gf128mul_and_shl1...

...an, vy); - OUT_RINGf (chan, 0.f); -} +#define MAP(f, p, v, ...) do { \ + int __i; \ + for (__i = 0; __i < sizeof(v)/sizeof(*(v)); __i++) \ + f(p, __i, v, ## __VA_ARGS__); \ + } while (0); -static inline void NV10MVertex(NVPtr pNv, float vx, float vy, float t0x, float t0y, float t1x, float t1y) +#define xFixedToFloat(v) \ + ((float)xFixedToInt((v)) + ((float)xFixedFrac(v) / 65536.0)) + +#define OUT_RINGi(chan, v, i) \ + OUT_RINGf(chan, xFixedToFloat((v).vector[i])) + +static inline void +emit_vertex(NVPtr pNv, int i, PictVector pos[], + PictVector tex0[], PictVector tex...

Changes: - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce

Changes: - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce

These patches make the changes necessary to build the kernel as Position Independent Executable (PIE) on x86_64. A PIE kernel can be relocated below the top 2G of the virtual address space. It allows to optionally extend the KASLR randomization range from 1G to 3G. Thanks a lot to Ard Biesheuvel & Kees Cook on their feedback on compiler changes, PIE support and KASLR in general. Thanks to

These patches make the changes necessary to build the kernel as Position Independent Executable (PIE) on x86_64. A PIE kernel can be relocated below the top 2G of the virtual address space. It allows to optionally extend the KASLR randomization range from 1G to 3G. Thanks a lot to Ard Biesheuvel & Kees Cook on their feedback on compiler changes, PIE support and KASLR in general. Thanks to

Changes: - patch v3: - Update on message to describe longer term PIE goal. - Minor change on ftrace if condition. - Changed code using xchgq. - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace

Changes: - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce dynamic relocation space on mapped memory. It also simplifies the relocation process. - Move the start the module section next to the kernel. Remove the need for -mcmodel=large on modules. Extends

Changes: - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce dynamic relocation space on mapped memory. It also simplifies the relocation process. - Move the start the module section next to the kernel. Remove the need for -mcmodel=large on modules. Extends