search for: t18

Hi, R-users, I met a problem: Items:[Anna 'moi =) akku loppu joskus 4ltä. Kestää kauan nää..'\tAmer, Tuusula (0:20)\t20\t12\t16\t00\t00\t11]/Anne 'Ei jakoa,uus päivä muistio et 4n niin peruin. Hups'\t (0:16)\t0\t12\t18\t00\t00\t11/Elina 'Konsertissa. En tod. vastaa teille'\tEtu-Töölö, Helsinki (2:40)\t24\t12\t18\t00\t00\t11 I want to parsing the above data into the below according to each "/": [Anna 'moi =) akku loppu joskus 4ltä. Kestää kauan nää..'\tAmer, Tuusula (0:20)\t20\t12\t...

...Constant:i32<0> // [a b] t27: i16 = extract_vector_elt t26, Constant:i32<0> // [a] t21: v2i16 = extract_subvector t2, Constant:i32<2> //[c d] t22: i16 = extract_vector_elt t21, Constant:i32<0> // [c] t25: v2i16 = BUILD_VECTOR t27, t22 // [a c] t18: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:v2i16 %m0, t25 t19: ch = RTN t18 t20: ch = RTN_REG_HOLDER t19, Register:v2i16 %m0, t18:1 Creating new node: t28: v2i16 = undef Creating new node: t29: v2i16 = vector_shuffle<0,0> t26, undef:v2i16 After reduceBuildVecToShuffle SelectionDAG has...

...t9: i32 = shl t4, Constant:i32<2> t10: i32 = add t6, t9 t12: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg79 t15: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg1 t16: ch = llvm.tpu.dma.write.1KB.async t0, TargetConstant:i32<4602>, t10, t12, t15 t18: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg166 t20: i32 = AssertZext t18, ValueType:ch:i1 t23: i1 = setcc t20, Constant:i32<0>, seteq:ch t25: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg396 t28: i1 = setcc t25, Constant:i32<255>, setugt:ch...

...gt;> t10: i32 = add t6, t9 >> t12: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg79 >> t15: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg1 >> t16: ch = llvm.tpu.dma.write.1KB.async t0, TargetConstant:i32<4602>, t10, t12, t15 >> t18: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg166 >> t20: i32 = AssertZext t18, ValueType:ch:i1 >> t23: i1 = setcc t20, Constant:i32<0>, seteq:ch >> t25: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg396 >> t28: i1 = setcc t25, Co...

...DAG has the AND op node: t22: i8 = srl t19, Constant:i64<1> * t23: i8 = and t22, Constant:i8<1>* t24: i32 = zero_extend t23 t27: i1 = setcc t24, Constant:i32<1>, seteq:ch t29: i1 = xor t27, Constant:i1<-1> t31: ch = brcond t18, t29, BasicBlock:ch<if.else 0xa5f8d48> t33: ch = br t31, BasicBlock:ch<if.then 0xa5f8c98> The Optimized lowered selection DAG does not contain the* AND* node, but it does have a truncate which would seem to stand in for it given the result is only 1bit wide and the xor following it i...

...; t22: i8 = srl t19, Constant:i64<1> > * t23: i8 = and t22, Constant:i8<1>* > t24: i32 = zero_extend t23 > t27: i1 = setcc t24, Constant:i32<1>, seteq:ch > t29: i1 = xor t27, Constant:i1<-1> > t31: ch = brcond t18, t29, BasicBlock:ch<if.else 0xa5f8d48> > t33: ch = br t31, BasicBlock:ch<if.then 0xa5f8c98> > > The Optimized lowered selection DAG does not contain the*AND* node, > but it does have a truncate which would seem to stand in for it given > the result is only 1bit wide a...

...gister:i32 %vreg3, t22 t27: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg8, Constant:i32<-1> t31: ch = TokenFactor t24, t27 t13: v2i1 = setcc t8, t11, setne:ch t16: i1 = extract_vector_elt t13, t15 t17: i32 = extract_vector_elt t8, t15 t18: i32 = extract_vector_elt t11, t15 t19: i1 = setcc t17, t18, setne:ch t20: i1 = xor t16, t19 ... I have not added any vector register class so 'DAGTypeLegalizer' tries to split the "t16: i1 = extract_vector_elt t13, t15" because t13's result type is ...

...duced by this simple program: > > thread_local int x = 0; > int main() { > return 0; > } > >When compiled into IR it produces similar error: > >LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: t19: i64 = X86ISD::WrapperRIP TargetGlobalTLSAddress:i64<i32* @x> 0 [TF=19] > t18: i64 = TargetGlobalTLSAddress<i32* @x> 0 [TF=19] >In function: _ZTW1x interestingly this works on my machine. llvm-ir attached 2017-02-07 15:31 GMT+00:00 Alex Denisov <1101.debian at gmail.com>: > I’ve seen the same problem, but didn’t find solution back then. > I can giv...

...undef:v8i64 t15: v8i64 = BUILD_VECTOR Constant:i64<0>, Constant:i64<1>, Constant:i64<2>, Constant:i64<3>, Constant:i64<4>, Constant:i64<5>, Constant:i64<6>, Constant:i64<7> t16: v8i64 = add t7, t15 t18: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:v8i64 %vreg16, t16 t20: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %vreg5 t22: i64 = AssertSext t20, ValueType:ch:i8 t23: v8i64 = insert_vector_elt undef:v8i64, t22, Constant:i64<0>...

...gt; t27: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg8, Constant:i32<-1> > t31: ch = TokenFactor t24, t27 > t13: v2i1 = setcc t8, t11, setne:ch > t16: i1 = extract_vector_elt t13, t15 > t17: i32 = extract_vector_elt t8, t15 > t18: i32 = extract_vector_elt t11, t15 > t19: i1 = setcc t17, t18, setne:ch > t20: i1 = xor t16, t19 > > ... > > I have not added any vector register class so 'DAGTypeLegalizer' tries > to split the "t16: i1 = extract_vector_elt t13, t15" becaus...

...; t22: i8 = srl t19, Constant:i64<1> > * t23: i8 = and t22, Constant:i8<1>* > t24: i32 = zero_extend t23 > t27: i1 = setcc t24, Constant:i32<1>, seteq:ch > t29: i1 = xor t27, Constant:i1<-1> > t31: ch = brcond t18, t29, BasicBlock:ch<if.else 0xa5f8d48> > t33: ch = br t31, BasicBlock:ch<if.then 0xa5f8c98> > > The Optimized lowered selection DAG does not contain the* AND* node, but > it does have a truncate which would seem to stand in for it given the > result is only 1bit wide an...

This post is related to the following post http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-April/098823.html I'm still trying to compile a library with clang. But now I'm getting as assert in lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringBase.cpp:1155: virtual llvm::EVT llvm::TargetLoweringBase::getSetCCResultType(llvm::LLVMContext&, llvm::EVT) const: Assertion `!VT.isVector() && "No default

...!14 %call = tail call i16 (...) @g() #2, !dbg !15 tail call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i16 %call, metadata !8, metadata !16), !dbg !17 tail call void @h(i16 %call) #2, !dbg !18 ret void, !dbg !19 } For the second call, the AArch64 ISel lowering produces a 32-bit CopyFromReg from w0. t18: ch,glue = AArch64ISD::CALL t15, TargetGlobalAddress:i64<i16 (...)* @g> 0, RegisterMask:Untyped, test.c:5:11 t19: ch,glue = callseq_end t18, TargetConstant:i64<0>, TargetConstant:i64<0>, t18:1, test.c:5:11 t20: i32,ch,glue = CopyFromReg t19, Register:i32 $w0, t19:1, test.c:5:1...

...gister:i32 %vreg3, t22 t27: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg8, Constant:i32<-1> t31: ch = TokenFactor t24, t27 t13: v2i1 = setcc t8, t11, setne:ch t16: i1 = extract_vector_elt t13, t15 t17: i32 = extract_vector_elt t8, t15 t18: i32 = extract_vector_elt t11, t15 t19: i1 = setcc t17, t18, setne:ch t20: i1 = xor t16, t19 ... I have not added any vector register class so 'DAGTypeLegalizer' tries to split the "t16: i1 = extract_vector_elt t13, t15" because t13's result type i...

...g() #2, !dbg !15 > tail call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i16 %call, metadata !8, metadata !16), !dbg !17 > tail call void @h(i16 %call) #2, !dbg !18 > ret void, !dbg !19 > } > > For the second call, the AArch64 ISel lowering produces a 32-bit CopyFromReg from w0. > > t18: ch,glue = AArch64ISD::CALL t15, TargetGlobalAddress:i64<i16 (...)* @g> 0, RegisterMask:Untyped, test.c:5:11 > t19: ch,glue = callseq_end t18, TargetConstant:i64<0>, TargetConstant:i64<0>, t18:1, test.c:5:11 > t20: i32,ch,glue = CopyFromReg t19, Register:i32 $w0, t19:1, te...

...t; > From: jdevlieghere at apple.com <jdevlieghere at apple.com> > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 4:07 AM > To: Se Jong Oh <sejooh at microsoft.com> > Cc: Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com>; pidgeot18 at gmail.com > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [SelectionDAG] DbgValue nodes aren't transferred > > Hi Sejong, > > Indeed, I think you are right and we should call transferDbgValues in SetPromotedInteger. > > I couldn’t immediately find a suitable in-tree test to verify this...

<div> </div><div><div><p>Carry-less multiplication[1] instructions exist (at least optionally) on many architectures: armv8, RISC-V, x86_64, POWER, SPARC, C64x, and possibly more.</p><p>This proposal is to add a <code>llvm.clmul</code> instruction. Or if that is contentious, <code>llvm.experimental.bitmanip.clmul</code> instruction.

+ LLVM-dev (clang is mostly about the frontend and this is a backend failure), you may have more change to get an answer. > On Feb 6, 2017, at 5:49 AM, Gaetano Checinski via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Running the following code with clang++ -S -emit-llvm main.cpp && lli main.ll on Linux(Debian) > > #include <future> > > int main () {

...gister:i32 %vreg3, t22 t27: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg8, Constant:i32<-1> t31: ch = TokenFactor t24, t27 t13: v2i1 = setcc t8, t11, setne:ch t16: i1 = extract_vector_elt t13, t15 t17: i32 = extract_vector_elt t8, t15 t18: i32 = extract_vector_elt t11, t15 t19: i1 = setcc t17, t18, setne:ch t20: i1 = xor t16, t19 ... I have not added any vector register class so 'DAGTypeLegalizer' tries to split the "t16: i1 = extract_vector_elt t13, t15" because t13's result type i...

...tion call, t30: i16 = CMPkr16 t4, TargetConstant:i16<0> t36: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i16 $sr, t30 t32: i16 = NEGSETCC TargetConstant:i16<4>, t36:1 And this is generated after the call t35: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i16 $sr, t30 t31: i16 = SELCC t19, t18, TargetConstant:i16<4>, t35:1 t21: ch,glue = CopyToReg t18:1, Register:i16 $r0, t31 NEGSETCC and SELCC are genuine instructions of my target architecture, they use the SR along with operands to produce a result. As you can see ‘t30’ is used both before and after the function call, which...