search for: t130

Thanks for the suggestion. I tried both of these with no difference in performance.I have tried several other Dell hosts with Idrac Enterprise and getting the same results. I also tried a new Dell T130 with Idrac express and was getting over 700 MB/s. Any other users had this issues with Idrac Enterprise?? On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:16 AM, Serkan ?oban <cobanserkan at gmail.com> wrote: > "Did you check the BIOS/Power settings? They should be set for high > performance. > Al...

...On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Ryan Wilkinson <ryanwilk at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion. I tried both of these with no difference in > performance.I have tried several other Dell hosts with Idrac Enterprise and > getting the same results. I also tried a new Dell T130 with Idrac express > and was getting over 700 MB/s. Any other users had this issues with Idrac > Enterprise?? > > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:16 AM, Serkan ?oban <cobanserkan at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> "Did you check the BIOS/Power settings? They should...

...6:12 PM, Ryan Wilkinson <ryanwilk at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestion. I tried both of these with no difference in > > performance.I have tried several other Dell hosts with Idrac Enterprise > and > > getting the same results. I also tried a new Dell T130 with Idrac > express > > and was getting over 700 MB/s. Any other users had this issues with > Idrac > > Enterprise?? > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:16 AM, Serkan ?oban <cobanserkan at gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> "D...

...main seemed to be an overkill so I now tend to use the server as a member of a workgroup, and purely as a fileserver. I installed a centos 5 server for a customer in 2012. As centos 5 support has ended, I recently persuaded that customer that it was time to update their server. I set up a new Dell T130 server with centos 7 and the latest downloaded samba. This was initially done offsite using my own windows 10 pro PC as a client, I added all the users and passwords before taking the server to site. All PCs on site were running win10 pro, version 1709, and previously had been connected to the cent...

...son <ryanwilk at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Thanks for the suggestion. I tried both of these with no difference in >> > performance.I have tried several other Dell hosts with Idrac Enterprise >> and >> > getting the same results. I also tried a new Dell T130 with Idrac >> express >> > and was getting over 700 MB/s. Any other users had this issues with >> Idrac >> > Enterprise?? >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:16 AM, Serkan ?oban <cobanserkan at gmail.com> >> > wrote: &gt...

...lto:ryanwilk at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Thanks for the suggestion.? I tried both of these with no > difference in > > performance.I have tried several other Dell hosts with Idrac > Enterprise and > > getting the same results.? I also tried a new Dell T130 with > Idrac express > > and was getting over 700 MB/s.? Any other users had this issues > with Idrac > > Enterprise?? > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:16 AM, Serkan ?oban > <cobanserkan at gmail.com <mailto:cobanser...

...gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > Thanks for the suggestion. I tried both of these with no difference in >>> > performance.I have tried several other Dell hosts with Idrac >>> Enterprise and >>> > getting the same results. I also tried a new Dell T130 with Idrac >>> express >>> > and was getting over 700 MB/s. Any other users had this issues with >>> Idrac >>> > Enterprise?? >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:16 AM, Serkan ?oban <cobanserkan at gmail.com&...

...>>>> > Thanks for the suggestion. I tried both of these with no difference >>>> in >>>> > performance.I have tried several other Dell hosts with Idrac >>>> Enterprise and >>>> > getting the same results. I also tried a new Dell T130 with Idrac >>>> express >>>> > and was getting over 700 MB/s. Any other users had this issues with >>>> Idrac >>>> > Enterprise?? >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:16 AM, Serkan ?oban &...

"Did you check the BIOS/Power settings? They should be set for high performance. Also you can try to boot "intel_idle.max_cstate=0" kernel command line option to be sure CPUs not entering power saving states. On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Ryan Wilkinson <ryanwilk at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I have a 3 host gluster replicated cluster that is providing storage for

I have a 3 host gluster replicated cluster that is providing storage for our RHEV environment. We've been having issues with inconsistent performance from the VMs depending on which Hypervisor they are running on. I've confirmed throughput to be ~9Gb/s to each of the storage hosts from the hypervisors. I'm getting ~300MB/s disk read spead when our test vm is on the slow Hypervisors

...undef:i64, undef:i64... Split node result: t127: v4i64 = BUILD_VECTOR undef:i64, undef:i64, undef:i64, undef:i64... Split node result: t128: v2i64 = BUILD_VECTOR undef:i64, undef:i64 Split node operand: t122: v128i16,ch = masked_gather<LD128[<unknown>](align=256)> t0, t130, t193, TargetConstant:i64<0>, t121 llc: /home/asusu/LLVM/llvm38Nov2016/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp:6804: llvm::MemSDNode::MemSDNode(unsigned int, unsigned int, const llvm::DebugLoc&, llvm::SDVTList, llvm::EVT, llvm::MachineMemOperand*): Assertion `memvt.getStor...

...> Split node result: t127: v4i64 = BUILD_VECTOR undef:i64, undef:i64, undef:i64, > undef:i64... > Split node result: t128: v2i64 = BUILD_VECTOR undef:i64, undef:i64 > > Split node operand: t122: v128i16,ch = masked_gather<LD128[<unknown>](align=256)> t0, > t130, t193, TargetConstant:i64<0>, t121 > > llc: > /llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp:6804: > llvm::MemSDNode::MemSDNode(unsigned int, unsigned int, const llvm::DebugLoc&, > llvm::SDVTList, llvm::EVT, llvm::MachineMemOperand*): Assertion `memvt.getStoreSize() &l...

Hello. Will, thanks a lot for pointing me to the MaskedGatherSDNode and mgatherv4i32. I have to say that the definition of the "multiclass avx512_gather" from lib/Target/X86/X86InstrAVX512.td is difficult to follow and I prefer not to use it. I currently have some serious problems with TableGen - it gives an assertion failure:

maybe i have solved this issue, i unplugged APC BackUPS from USB 2.0 and PLUGGED INTO USB 3.0 and now it works prefectly at first time without any side effects, strange, this shoud be working since USB 1.0 so ups driver is configured OK, this config works ok for backups, this looks like there is no problem with detection of UPS but with USB driver or something around so simply if somebody has

...ar/run/nut/upsd.pid: No such file or directory" and "systemd[1]: nut-monitor.service: PID file /var/run/nut/upsmon.pid not readable (yet?) after start: No such file or directory" Might be just because services are slow to start? Some details: TrippLite SMART1500LCD Dell PowerEdge T130 Proxmox on Debian 9 Linux host 4.10.17-2-pve #1 SMP PVE 4.10.17-20 (Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:23:37 +0200) x86_64 GNU/Linux root at host:~# upsd -V Network UPS Tools upsd 2.7.4 root at host:~# lsusb | grep "Tripp Lite" Bus 001 Device 002: ID 09ae:2012 Tripp Lite root at host:~# cat /et...