search for: t10

...as 14 nodes: t0: ch = EntryToken t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %vreg0 t4: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %vreg1 t6: i64 = sub t4, Constant:i64<1> t7: i64 = shl Constant:i64<1>, t6 t9: i64 = xor t7, Constant:i64<-1> t10: i64 = and t2, t9 t12: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 %R1, t10 t13: ch = XSTGISD::Ret t12, Register:i64 %R1, t12:1 Combining: t13: ch = XSTGISD::Ret t12, Register:i64 %R1, t12:1 Combining: t12: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 %R1, t10 Combining: t11: i64 = Register %R1 Combinin...

...i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %vreg0 >> t4: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %vreg1 >> t6: i64 = sub t4, Constant:i64<1> >> t7: i64 = shl Constant:i64<1>, t6 >> t9: i64 = xor t7, Constant:i64<-1> >> t10: i64 = and t2, t9 >> t12: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 %R1, t10 >> t13: ch = XSTGISD::Ret t12, Register:i64 %R1, t12:1 >> >> >> >> Combining: t13: ch = XSTGISD::Ret t12, Register:i64 %R1, t12:1 >> >> Combining: t12: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0,...

hello, does lustre support OSD T10 standard? Can it be used with IBM''s/Intel''s OSD initiator and target? Thanks, Ashish -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20071128/c2de31a6/attachment-0002.html

...as 14 nodes: t0: ch = EntryToken t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %vreg0 t4: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %vreg1 t6: i64 = sub t4, Constant:i64<1> t7: i64 = shl Constant:i64<1>, t6 t9: i64 = xor t7, Constant:i64<-1> t10: i64 = and t2, t9 t12: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 %R1, t10 t13: ch = XSTGISD::Ret t12, Register:i64 %R1, t12:1 Combining: t13: ch = XSTGISD::Ret t12, Register:i64 %R1, t12:1 Combining: t12: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 %R1, t10 Combining: t11: i64 = Register %R1 Combinin...

...reg0 > t4: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %vreg1 > t6: i64 = sub t4, Constant:i64<1> > t7: i64 = shl Constant:i64<1>, t6 > t9: i64 = xor t7, Constant:i64<-1> > t10: i64 = and t2, t9 > t12: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 %R1, t10 > t13: ch = XSTGISD::Ret t12, Register:i64 %R1, t12:1 > > > > Combining: t13: ch = XSTGISD::Ret t12, Register:i64 %R1, t12:1 > > Combining: t12: ch,glue...

...ich I would like to apply a model estimated from only a single dataset (sort of a crude - out of sample application - to show the variances). lets say, names(a) [1] "stdnoi" "momentum" "tbm3" "metcons" "premium" "STDrfa" "t10" "Y" attach(a) mymodel <- lm(Y ~ stdnoi+momentum+tbm3+metcons+premium+ STDrfa + t10) detach(a) load('b') names(b) [1] "stdnoi" "momentum" "tbm3" "metcons" "premium" "STDrfa" "t10" "Y&q...

...to which I found a solution but it doesn't feel to be a smart solution, any ideas or help of how to improve this would be welcomed. # sample code: # creating a simple file zz <- file("ex.data", "w") # open an output file connection cat( "1\t2\t3\t4\t5\t6\t7\t8\t9\t10\t\t555\t\t", file = zz, sep = "\n") cat( "1\t2\t3\t4\t5\t6\t7\t8\t9\t10\t\t555\t\t", file = zz, sep = "\n") cat( "1\t2\t3\t4\t5\t6\t7\t8\t9\t10\t\t555\t\t", file = zz, sep = "\n") (temp.file = scan("ex.data", what = "", sep...

...a coefficient matrix (typically, the LHS) since each line of said matrix, which corresponds to the constraints, needs to be a function of the unknowns in the objective function -- being, p1, p2, p3 and p4. In Maple (for example), this is trivial: ???? cost:=35*p10+55*p12+50*p14+65*p16; cnsts:={t10=640,t12=t10-p10+825,t14=t12-p12+580,t16=t14-p14+925,t16-p16=0,p10<=t10,p12<=t12,p14<=t14,p16<=t16,t10<=1000,t12<=1000,t14<=1000,t16<=1000}; ? ?? Minimize(cost,cnsts,assume={nonnegative}); which yields (correctly): p1=640, p2=405, p3=1000, p4=925 for minimized cost of 154...

...p this small. SelectionDAG has 36 nodes: t0: ch = EntryToken t6: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg507 t2: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg17 t4: i32 = or t2, Constant:i32<256> t9: i32 = shl t4, Constant:i32<2> t10: i32 = add t6, t9 t12: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg79 t15: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg1 t16: ch = llvm.tpu.dma.write.1KB.async t0, TargetConstant:i32<4602>, t10, t12, t15 t18: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg166...

...he LHS) since each line of said > matrix, which corresponds to the constraints, needs to be a function of > the unknowns in the objective function -- being, p1, p2, p3 and p4. > > In Maple (for example), this is trivial: > > ???? cost:=35*p10+55*p12+50*p14+65*p16; > cnsts:={t10=640,t12=t10-p10+825,t14=t12-p12+580,t16=t14-p14+925,t16-p16=0,p10<=t10,p12<=t12,p14<=t14,p16<=t16,t10<=1000,t12<=1000,t14<=1000,t16<=1000}; > ? ?? Minimize(cost,cnsts,assume={nonnegative}); > > which yields (correctly): > > p1=640, p2=405, p3=1000, p4=925...

...0: ch = EntryToken >> t6: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg507 >> t2: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg17 >> t4: i32 = or t2, Constant:i32<256> >> t9: i32 = shl t4, Constant:i32<2> >> t10: i32 = add t6, t9 >> t12: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg79 >> t15: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %vreg1 >> t16: ch = llvm.tpu.dma.write.1KB.async t0, TargetConstant:i32<4602>, t10, t12, t15 >> t18: i32,ch = CopyF...

Dear all, Please suggest me how can I do it. I have a matrix which look like following: x1 x2 x3 t1 .01 0.3 0 t2 0 0.1 0.01 t3 0 .01 .01 t4 0 0 t5 5 0 0 t6 0 0 0 t7 0 0 0 t8 0 0 0 t9 0.6 0 0 t10 0 0 0.66 t11 0 0.6 0.11 t12 0 0.4 0 I want to sort decreasing order in each column based on rows. and then to display only those rows which has a value. The expected out put matrix will look like x1 x2 x3 t9 0.6 t11 0.6 t10 0.66 t1 .01 t12 0.4 t11 0.11 t1 0.3 t2 .01 t2 0.1 t3 .01 many...

...nction: define i16 @fun(i16 %arg) {   %1 = tail call i16 @llvm.ctlz.i16(i16 %arg, i1 false)   ret i16 %1 } ,gives this optimized DAG as input to instruction selection: SelectionDAG has 15 nodes:   t0: ch = EntryToken                 t2: i32,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i32 %0               t10: i32 = and t2, Constant:i32<65535>             t16: i64 = zero_extend t10           t17: i64 = ctlz t16         t22: i64 = add t17, Constant:i64<-32>       t20: i32 = truncate t22     t15: i32 = add t20, Constant:i32<-16>   t7: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i32 $r2l, t15...

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 01:21:53PM -0600, Greg Edwards wrote: > Commands with protection information included were not truncating the > protection iov_iter to the number of protection bytes in the command. > This resulted in vhost_scsi mis-calculating the size of the protection > SGL in vhost_scsi_calc_sgls(), and including both the protection and > data SG entries in the protection

...ating new node: t4: i16,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i16 %0 Creating new node: t5: i16 = add t2, t4 Creating constant: t6: i16 = Constant<0> Creating new node: t7: i16 = undef Creating new node: t8: i8,ch = load<(load 1 from %ir.scevgep1, !tbaa !2)> t0, t5, undef:i16 Creating new node: t10: i16,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i16 %2 Creating new node: t11: i16 = add t10, t4 Creating new node: t12: ch = store<(store 1 into %ir.scevgep, !tbaa !2)> t8:1, t8, t11, undef:i16 Creating constant: t13: i16 = Constant<1> Creating new node: t14: i16 = add nuw nsw t4, Constant:i16<1...

...s. > > in order to do this i have made necessary changes in > X86ISelLowering.cpp. and rebuild llvm. then when i use the > command -view-dag-combine2-dags i get the required output in graph > but the following error on console: > > LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: t10: ch = store<ST256[bitcast ([65 x > i32]* @a to <64 x i32>*)](align=16)(tbaa=<0x30c5438>)> t9, t7, > t12, undef:i64 > t7: v64i32 = add t6, t4 > t6: v64i32,ch = load<LD256[bitcast ([65 x i32]* @c to <64 x > i32>*)](align=16)(tbaa=&lt...

Hello, I am trying to complete a PCA on a set of standardized ring widths from 8 different sites (T10, T9, T8, T7, T6, T5, T3, and T2). The following is a small portion of my data: T10 T9 T8 T7 T6 T5 T3 T2 1.33738 0.92669 0.91146 0.98922 0.9308 0.88201 0.92287 0.91775 0.82181 1.05319 0.92908 0.97971 0.95165 0.98029 1.14048 0.77803 0.88294 0.96413 0.90893 0.87957 0.9961 0.74926 0.71394 0.70877 1.07...

Hello, I am getting this error. What instruction is required to be implemented? LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: t22: v32i32 = vselect t724, t11, t16 t724: v32i32,ch = load<LD128[FixedStack1]> t723, FrameIndex:i64<1>, undef:i64 t659: i64 = FrameIndex<1> t10: i64 = undef t11: v32i32,ch = load<LD128[%sunkaddr45](align=4)(tbaa=<0x481f1e8>)> t0, t8, undef:i64 t8: i64 = add t7, Constant:i64<4> t7: i64 = add t2, t63 t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %vreg97 t1: i64 = Register %vreg97 t63: i64 =...

...ns. >> >> in order to do this i have made necessary changes in X86ISelLowering.cpp. >> and rebuild llvm. then when i use the command -view-dag-combine2-dags i >> get the required output in graph but the following error on console: >> >> LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: t10: ch = store<ST256[bitcast ([65 x i32]* @a >> to <64 x i32>*)](align=16)(tbaa=<0x30c5438>)> t9, t7, t12, undef:i64 >> t7: v64i32 = add t6, t4 >> t6: v64i32,ch = load<LD256[bitcast ([65 x i32]* @c to <64 x >> i32>*)](align=16)(tbaa=<0x30c543...

Hi, I''ve been looking at Btrfs and have a couple of naive questions that don''t seem to be answered on the wiki or in the articles I''ve read on the filesystem. First: discovering a file''s checksum value. Here''s the scenario: software is writing some data as a fresh file. This software happens to know (a priori) the checksum of this data; for