search for: t0x

This arose in testing [.terms and has me confused. data(esoph)?? # use a standard data set t0x <- terms(model.frame( ~ tobgp, data=esoph)) t1 <-? terms(model.frame(ncases ~ agegp + tobgp, data=esoph)) t1x <- (delete.response(t1))[-1] > all.equal(t0x, t1x) [1] TRUE # the above is wrong, because they actually are not the same > all.equal(attr(t0x, 'dataClasses'), at...

On 05/04/2019 10:19 a.m., Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote: > Duncan, > ? I should have included it in my original note, but > > ?? ? all.equal(unclass(t0x), unclass(t1x)) > > returns TRUE as well.? I had tried that as well. ? But a further look at > all.equal.default shows the following line right near the top: > ??? if (is.language(target) || is.function(target)) > ??????? return(all.equal.language(target, current, ...)) > &gt...

...Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote: > > > On 4/5/19 9:39 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: >> On 05/04/2019 10:19 a.m., Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote: >>> Duncan, >>> ?? I should have included it in my original note, but >>> >>> ??? ? all.equal(unclass(t0x), unclass(t1x)) >>> >>> returns TRUE as well.? I had tried that as well. ? But a further look at >>> all.equal.default shows the following line right near the top: >>> ???? if (is.language(target) || is.function(target)) >>> ???????? return(all.equal.l...

On 05/04/2019 9:03 a.m., Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel wrote: > This arose in testing [.terms and has me confused. > > data(esoph)?? # use a standard data set > > t0x <- terms(model.frame( ~ tobgp, data=esoph)) > t1 <-? terms(model.frame(ncases ~ agegp + tobgp, data=esoph)) > t1x <- (delete.response(t1))[-1] > > > all.equal(t0x, t1x) > [1] TRUE > > # the above is wrong, because they actually are not the same > > >...

...>> On 4/5/19 9:39 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: >>> On 05/04/2019 10:19 a.m., Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote: >>>> Duncan, >>>> ?? I should have included it in my original note, but >>>> >>>> ??? ? all.equal(unclass(t0x), unclass(t1x)) >>>> >>>> returns TRUE as well.? I had tried that as well. ? But a further look at >>>> all.equal.default shows the following line right near the top: >>>> ???? if (is.language(target) || is.function(target)) >&...

...continue; + tps++; + switch (type) { + case 6: /* texture error... unknown for now */ + nv50_pfb_vm_trap(dev, display, name); + if (display) { + NV_ERROR(dev, "magic set %d:\n", i); + for (r = ustatus_addr + 4; r <= ustatus_addr + 0x10; r += 4) + NV_ERROR(dev, "\t0x%08x: 0x%08x\n", r, + nv_rd32(dev, r)); + } + break; + case 7: /* MP error */ + if (ustatus & 0x00010000) { + nv50_pgraph_mp_trap(dev, i, display); + ustatus &= ~0x00010000; + } + break; + case 8: /* TPDMA error */ + { + uint32_t e0c = nv_rd32(dev, ustatus_add...

This will fix races between generated ctxprogs and interrupt handler. Signed-off-by: Marcin Ko?cielnicki <koriakin at 0x04.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_grctx.c | 5 +++++ 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_grctx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_grctx.c index d105fcd..9f909ab 100644 ---

..., Duncan Murdoch wrote: > >>> On 05/04/2019 10:19 a.m., Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote: > >>>> Duncan, > >>>> ?? I should have included it in my original note, but > >>>> > >>>> ??? ? all.equal(unclass(t0x), unclass(t1x)) > >>>> > >>>> returns TRUE as well.? I had tried that as well. ? But a further look at > >>>> all.equal.default shows the following line right near the top: > >>>> ???? if (is.language(target) || is.func...

...itfield nv50_graph_trap_m2mf[] = { { 0x00000001, "NOTIFY" }, { 0x00000002, "IN" }, @@ -532,6 +541,13 @@ nv50_priv_tp_trap(struct nv50_graph_priv *priv, int type, u32 ustatus_old, for (r = ustatus_addr + 4; r <= ustatus_addr + 0x10; r += 4) nv_error(priv, "\t0x%08x: 0x%08x\n", r, nv_rd32(priv, r)); + if (ustatus) { + nv_error(priv, "%s - TP%d:", name, i); + nouveau_bitfield_print(nv50_tex_traps, + ustatus); + pr_cont("\n"); + ustatus = 0; + } } break; case 7: /* MP error */ --...

Hello, I have a dual-GPU card GeForce 7950 GX2 (PCI ID 10de:0294). Unfortunately, I cannot make a dump using renouveau, because the program crashes. The backtrace looks like this: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00000000004153af in read_fb_ramin (instanceMem=4, offset=2) at objects.c:4089 4089 return fb[((fb_size - (ramin_block*512*1024) + ramin_inst)/4) +

...f --git a/arch/x86/crypto/glue_helper-asm-avx2.S b/arch/x86/crypto/glue_helper-asm-avx2.S index a53ac11dd385..e04c80467bd2 100644 --- a/arch/x86/crypto/glue_helper-asm-avx2.S +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/glue_helper-asm-avx2.S @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ vmovdqu (iv), t2x; \ vmovdqa t2x, t3x; \ inc_le128(t2x, t0x, t1x); \ - vbroadcasti128 bswap, t1; \ + vbroadcasti128 bswap(%rip), t1; \ vinserti128 $1, t2x, t3, t2; /* ab: le0 ; cd: le1 */ \ vpshufb t1, t2, x0; \ \ @@ -124,13 +124,13 @@ tivx, t0, t0x, t1, t1x, t2, t2x, t3, \ xts_gf128mul_and_shl1_mask_0, \ xts_gf128mul_and...

..., vx); - OUT_RINGf (chan, vy); - OUT_RINGf (chan, 0.f); -} +#define MAP(f, p, v, ...) do { \ + int __i; \ + for (__i = 0; __i < sizeof(v)/sizeof(*(v)); __i++) \ + f(p, __i, v, ## __VA_ARGS__); \ + } while (0); -static inline void NV10MVertex(NVPtr pNv, float vx, float vy, float t0x, float t0y, float t1x, float t1y) +#define xFixedToFloat(v) \ + ((float)xFixedToInt((v)) + ((float)xFixedFrac(v) / 65536.0)) + +#define OUT_RINGi(chan, v, i) \ + OUT_RINGf(chan, xFixedToFloat((v).vector[i])) + +static inline void +emit_vertex(NVPtr pNv, int i, PictVector pos[], + PictVector...

...ubvol_path, path); + + printf("mkdir\t%s\n", full_path); + + free(full_path); + return 0; +} + +static int print_mknod(const char *path, u64 mode, u64 dev, void *user) +{ + struct recv_args *r = user; + char *full_path = path_cat(r->full_subvol_path, path); + + printf("mknod\t%llo\t0x%llx\t%s\n", (unsigned long long)mode, + (unsigned long long)dev, full_path); + + free(full_path); + return 0; +} + +static int print_mkfifo(const char *path, void *user) +{ + struct recv_args *r = user; + char *full_path = path_cat(r->full_subvol_path, path); + + printf("mkfifo\...

...ch_init(init, pack, p) { + next = init->addr + init->count * 8; + addr = init->addr; + + nvkm_trace(&therm->subdev, "{ 0x%06x, %d, 0x%08x }\n", + init->addr, init->count, init->data); + while (addr < next) { + nvkm_trace(&therm->subdev, "\t0x%06x = 0x%08x\n", + addr, init->data); + nvkm_wr32(device, addr, init->data); + addr += 8; + } + } +} + +static const struct nvkm_therm_func +gf100_therm_func = { + .init = gt215_therm_init, + .fini = g84_therm_fini, + .pwm_ctrl = nv50_fan_pwm_ctrl, + .pwm_get = nv50_fan_pwm_ge...

Changes: - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce

Changes: - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace implementation. - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. - rfc v3: - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce

These patches make the changes necessary to build the kernel as Position Independent Executable (PIE) on x86_64. A PIE kernel can be relocated below the top 2G of the virtual address space. It allows to optionally extend the KASLR randomization range from 1G to 3G. Thanks a lot to Ard Biesheuvel & Kees Cook on their feedback on compiler changes, PIE support and KASLR in general. Thanks to

These patches make the changes necessary to build the kernel as Position Independent Executable (PIE) on x86_64. A PIE kernel can be relocated below the top 2G of the virtual address space. It allows to optionally extend the KASLR randomization range from 1G to 3G. Thanks a lot to Ard Biesheuvel & Kees Cook on their feedback on compiler changes, PIE support and KASLR in general. Thanks to

Next version of my patchseries for adding clockgating support for kepler1 and 2 on nouveau. The first version of this series can be found here: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/36504/ Some very important changes: - Fix gf100_clkgate_init() to actually write registers! This got broken in the last version by accident - Dump the register packs and the resulting register writes into

Changes: - patch v3: - Update on message to describe longer term PIE goal. - Minor change on ftrace if condition. - Changed code using xchgq. - patch v2: - Adapt patch to work post KPTI and compiler changes - Redo all performance testing with latest configs and compilers - Simplify mov macro on PIE (MOVABS now) - Reduce GOT footprint - patch v1: - Simplify ftrace