Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "t0_xyzw".
Did you mean:
t10_xyzw
2012 Sep 27
1
[LLVMdev] Setting cl::opt<bool> EnablePhysicalJoin without a command line
...or function main: Post SSA, not tracking liveness
Function Live Ins: %T2_X in %vreg0, %T1_W in %vreg1, %T1_Z in %vreg2, %
T1_Y in %vreg3, %T1_X in %vreg4
BB#0: derived from LLVM BB %main_body
Live Ins: %T2_X %T1_W %T1_Z %T1_Y %T1_X
%T0_X<def> = MOV %T1_X<kill>, 0, pred:%noreg, %T0_XYZW<imp-def>
%T2_X<def> = KILL %T2_X<kill>, %T2_XYZW<imp-def>
%T0_Y<def> = MOV %T1_Y<kill>, 0, pred:%noreg, %T0_XYZW<imp-def>
%T0_Z<def> = MOV %T1_Z<kill>, 0, pred:%noreg, %T0_XYZW<imp-def>
%T0_W<def> = MOV %T1_W<kill&...
2012 Oct 25
2
[LLVMdev] RegisterCoalescing Pass seems to ignore part of CFG.
...4r:0)[880B,1056r:0) 0 at 480r
LHS = %vreg48 [416r,448B:0)[448B,480r:1)[1120r,1168B:2) 0 at 416r 1 at 448B-phi 2 at 1120r
merge %vreg6:0 at 480r into %vreg48:1 at 448B --> @448B
erased:480r%vreg6<def> = COPY %vreg48<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg6,%vreg48
AllocationOrder(R600_Reg128) = [ %T0_XYZW %T1_XYZW %T2_XYZW %T3_XYZW %T4_XYZW %T5_XYZW %T6_XYZW %T7_XYZW %T8_XYZW %T9_XYZW %T10_XYZW %T11_XYZW %T12_XYZW %T13_XYZW %T14_XYZW %T15_XYZW %T16_XYZW %T17_XYZW %T18_XYZW %T19_XYZW %T20_XYZW %T21_XYZW %T22_XYZW %T23_XYZW %T24_XYZW %T25_XYZW %T26_XYZW %T27_XYZW %T28_XYZW %T29_XYZW %T30_XYZW %T31_XYZ...
2012 Oct 25
0
[LLVMdev] RegisterCoalescing Pass seems to ignore part of CFG.
...gt; LHS = %vreg48 [416r,448B:0)[448B,480r:1)[1120r,1168B:2) 0 at 416r 1 at 448B-phi
> 2 at 1120r
> merge %vreg6:0 at 480r into %vreg48:1 at 448B --> @448B
> erased:480r%vreg6<def> = COPY %vreg48<kill>;
> R600_Reg128:%vreg6,%vreg48
> AllocationOrder(R600_Reg128) = [ %T0_XYZW %T1_XYZW %T2_XYZW %T3_XYZW %T4_XYZW
> %T5_XYZW %T6_XYZW %T7_XYZW %T8_XYZW %T9_XYZW %T10_XYZW %T11_XYZW %T12_XYZW
> %T13_XYZW %T14_XYZW %T15_XYZW %T16_XYZW %T17_XYZW %T18_XYZW %T19_XYZW %T20_XYZW
> %T21_XYZW %T22_XYZW %T23_XYZW %T24_XYZW %T25_XYZW %T26_XYZW %T27_XYZW %T28_XYZW
> %T29...
2012 Oct 20
2
[LLVMdev] RegisterCoalescing pass crashes with ImplicitDef registers
...vreg6 in %vreg9:sel_x
RHS = %vreg6 [112r,160r:0) 0 at 112r
LHS = %vreg9 [160r,176r:0) 0 at 160r
merge %vreg9:0 at 160r into %vreg6:0 at 112r --> @112r
erased:160r%vreg9:sel_x<def,read-undef> = COPY %vreg6<kill>; R600_Reg128:%vreg9 R600_Reg32:%vreg6
AllocationOrder(R600_Reg128) = [ %T0_XYZW %T1_XYZW %T2_XYZW %T3_XYZW %T4_XYZW %T5_XYZW %T6_XYZW %T7_XYZW %T8_XYZW %T9_XYZW %T10_XYZW %T11_XYZW %T12_XYZW %T13_XYZW %T14_XYZW %T15_XYZW %T16_XYZW %T17_XYZW %T18_XYZW %T19_XYZW %T20_XYZW %T21_XYZW %T22_XYZW %T23_XYZW %T24_XYZW %T25_XYZW %T26_XYZW %T27_XYZW %T28_XYZW %T29_XYZW %T30_XYZW %T31_XYZ...
2012 Oct 25
0
[LLVMdev] RegisterCoalescing Pass seems to ignore part of CFG.
Hi Vincent,
On 24/10/2012 23:26, Vincent Lejeune wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if my llvm ir code is faulty, or if I spot a bug in the RegisterCoalescing Pass, so I'm posting my issue on the ML. Shader and print-before-all dump are given below.
>
> The interessing part is the vreg6/vreg48 reduction : before RegCoalescing, the machine code is :
>
> // BEFORE LOOP
>
2012 Oct 24
3
[LLVMdev] RegisterCoalescing Pass seems to ignore part of CFG.
Hi,
I don't know if my llvm ir code is faulty, or if I spot a bug in the RegisterCoalescing Pass, so I'm posting my issue on the ML. Shader and print-before-all dump are given below.
The interessing part is the vreg6/vreg48 reduction : before RegCoalescing, the machine code is :
// BEFORE LOOP
... Some COPYs....
400B%vreg47<def> = COPY %vreg2<kill>; R600_Reg32:%vreg47,%vreg2