Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "t025".
Did you mean:
1025
2008 Feb 22
0
[LLVMdev] Alignment on byval parameters
...er
> than the ones above?
I'm having here (x866-32/linux):
Running /home/asl/proj/llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2/src/gcc/testsuite/g
++.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp ...
Running /home/asl/proj/llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.exp ...
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t025 c_compat_x_tst.o compile,
(internal compiler error)
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t025 c_compat_y_tst.o compile,
(internal compiler error)
FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t026
cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute
FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t027 cp_compat_x_tst.o compile,...
2008 Feb 22
0
[LLVMdev] Alignment on byval parameters
...e best test I know for calling convention compatibility is the
struct-layout-1 part of the gcc testsuite. It is run like this from
the gcc build directory:
make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS=struct-layout-1.exp
Takes 15 minutes or so. I currently have the following failures
remaining on Darwin:
C: t025, t028
C++: t024, t026, t027
All of these are due to using MMX instructions without EMMS in the
right places (Chris checked in some stuff that was supposed to fix
this, but it doesn't, I must have oversimplified the test case.) That
is, I think all the calling convention stuff is now cor...