search for: szmek

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 08:39:07PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 28.02.17 19:28, Daniel P. Berrange (berrange at redhat.com) wrote: > > The problem with splitting these rules out into a separate project > > is that there's no other existing place that they would live. The > > "virtio people" as a group merely write specifications. The actual >

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 08:39:07PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 28.02.17 19:28, Daniel P. Berrange (berrange at redhat.com) wrote: > > The problem with splitting these rules out into a separate project > > is that there's no other existing place that they would live. The > > "virtio people" as a group merely write specifications. The actual >

Hi, I have a box with / and /home being subvolumes from the same btrfs filesystem. /etc/fstab: UUID=c0686... / btrfs subvol=root,x-systemd.device-timeout=0 1 1 UUID=c0686... /home btrfs subvol=home,x-systemd.device-timeout=0 1 1 ... / is initially mounted readonly by the initramfs, and then after switching to the real system, /home is attempted to be mounted in parallel with /

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:47:42AM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > >>>> One could argue about back-level compatibility, but virtio by-path > >>>> naming has changed multiple times. We have seen virtio-pci-virtio<n> > >>>> (not predictable), pci-<busid> and virtio-pci-<busid> already. It > >>>> might be a good time now

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:47:42AM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > >>>> One could argue about back-level compatibility, but virtio by-path > >>>> naming has changed multiple times. We have seen virtio-pci-virtio<n> > >>>> (not predictable), pci-<busid> and virtio-pci-<busid> already. It > >>>> might be a good time now

On 01.03.2017 04:30, Zbigniew J?drzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:47:42AM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: >>>>>> One could argue about back-level compatibility, but virtio by-path >>>>>> naming has changed multiple times. We have seen virtio-pci-virtio<n> >>>>>> (n...

01.03.2017 06:43, Zbigniew J?drzejewski-Szmek ?????: > > We could keep an informal list of people who care about specific areas. MAINTAINERS file as part of systemd sources?

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:02:53PM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > On 01.03.2017 04:30, Zbigniew J?drzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:47:42AM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > >>>>>> One could argue about back-level compatibility, but virtio by-path > >>>>>> naming has changed multiple times. We have seen virtio-pci-virtio<n> > >&gt...

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:02:53PM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > On 01.03.2017 04:30, Zbigniew J?drzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:47:42AM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > >>>>>> One could argue about back-level compatibility, but virtio by-path > >>>>>> naming has changed multiple times. We have seen virtio-pci-virtio<n> > >&gt...

On 01.03.2017 16:58, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 04:02:53PM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: >> On 01.03.2017 04:30, Zbigniew J?drzejewski-Szmek wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:47:42AM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: >>>>>>>> One could argue about back-level compatibility, but virtio by-path >>>>>>>> naming has changed multiple times. We have seen virtio-pci-virtio<n> &gt...