search for: szenarios

I have a problem with including extra data in a lattice graphic. I am trying to put some calculated values in an extra column of a boxplot. A minimal example should show what I am trying to do: foo <- data.frame( Treatment=rnorm(1:12,2),

hi list, i have a problem joining a samba 2.2.12 linux server to a w2k3 domain (native mode). background: i have to upgrade an AIX box running samba 2.2.x to 3.0.x but want to simulate this under vmware workstation first. i compiled this version w/out any options (no winbind, ldap, ssl etc) - i think that's not necessary... smb.conf -------- [global] WORKGROUP = ADDOMAIN PASSWORD

Hi everybody! I've setup my dialplan so that if an extension dials *21*, that extension is added/removed as a queue member to a queue. (State toggled). But it would be great to get an "optical feedback" of that phone's state regarding the queue membership. Does someone know if it is possible to light up a LED under this szenario? Many thanks! Norbert

Hi, the following szenario leads to a problem: I connect an CAPI channel to an AGI-Script per Manager API. This Agi script starts the MeetMe-Application. The Person on the Capi Channel is now able to speak with the other conferess in the MeetMe-Room. But if the CAPI channel hangs up, the busy tone is streamed into the MeetMe Room for several seconds, until the CAPI HANGUP-Signal is finally

addition to my last post: http://groups.google.com/group/llvm-dev/browse_thread/thread/afd85c3f303ec2a9 i know that using static on my globals will remove them - no other compilation unit can then extern the vars but my question is - in this closed szenario clang is "directly" producing the exe - isn't clang aware of that the vars are not in use? btw: the microsoft compiler

Hello List, I have a problem with the CA on my Puppetmaster. This Puppetmaster is connected to different Networks with different sub domainnames. The Puppet clients connecting via different Interfaces. There is no routing between subnets. Only one subnet can connect successfully. This is because the subject in the Certificate is the name of this subnet. All other clients get: Could not

On 2012-07-05 12:53, Dennis Luehring wrote: > addition to my last post: > http://groups.google.com/group/llvm-dev/browse_thread/thread/afd85c3f303ec2a9 > > i know that using static on my globals will remove them - no other > compilation unit can then extern the vars > > but my question is - in this closed szenario clang is "directly" > producing the exe -

Hi, I searched a while about T.38 decoding, and learned about the bounty for T.38 support for asterisk and some softdecoders and some hardware de- and encoding T.38. Now I wonder, if there is already any (almost) ready to use solution for decoding of T.38 faxes? My szenario would be: - Receiving a SIP call (containing the T.38 fax) by my provider with my asterisk box. - asterisk would

Hello Gluster Community, I am using Gluster3.10 in a 2-Node-Szenario (with CentosOS7-machines). After restarting one of the nodes, sometimes one of these two phenomena occurs: 1. The brick process of a volume on the newly started node is no longer running 2. The Brick Process Is Running But The First Knot Still Believes He Can not Reach The Brick (Health info reported "Transport

Due to security reasons smb signing has to be activated and this share between linux and windows is now dead. And I do not find the correct settings to do a public share in this szenario. It has to be public, because the linux is'nt allowed to join the domain and on the other way, the win-clients cannot leave their domains. And I think, just signing smb-messages should not speek against a

Hi, I have a simple use case, but can''t get the dependency resolution to work on first run. This is not critical, but I want to understand what''s going on. Here''s the szenario: * puppet --version: 2.6.4 * on the bare system, I have vim 6.4 installed (no vim-base) * I first want to upgrade to the latest version in repo, which is 7.1, * and then install vim extensions for

Hi Dimitry, On 05/07/12 13:30, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-07-05 12:53, Dennis Luehring wrote: >> addition to my last post: >> http://groups.google.com/group/llvm-dev/browse_thread/thread/afd85c3f303ec2a9 >> >> i know that using static on my globals will remove them - no other >> compilation unit can then extern the vars >> >> but my question is -

...local LVM on each node, put them in a drbd and install an os (debian 4 or ubuntu 8). The xens are running as pvm. Everything works fine since over 4 months now. But we have some performance-Problems: Writing on the Xen-devices produces an iowait about 50 to 60% on the xen-processors. we have 3 szenarios tested: a) Xen on DRBD b) Xen on DRBD but disconnected c) direct mounted DRBD You can see the difference in Write pro Char and Write per Block. a: 3792 / 4011 b: 52037 / 103777 c: 57135 / 325002 See bonnie_result.txt for more data. We attached our drbd.conf and a xen-config for your informatio...

Hi List, I have a szenario where I need to reach a host on the internet from a "firewalled" network but there is a HTTPS-proxy runnnig. As some people know you can tunnel all TCP-connections through this proxy because it can't decide if someone is really doing SSL or just Telnet to port 443 (or use SSH in our case). So I've written a patch for ssh to make it send the CONNECT

Hi Rowland The client is stopping communication, not the server. With error 1240. And since it is working with the client setting RequireSecuritySignature=0 without any problem, ' hosts allow' cannot be either the problem nor the solution. So - setting RequireSecuritySignature=1 at the client needs a corresponding setting at the server - I guess. But even explicit settings on samba side

Can find documented how many CPUS can Xen support and how many Virtual Machines per CPU are allowed? Can someone please supply this info? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Supported--of-CPUs-VMs-per-CPUs-tf2278842.html#a6329630 Sent from the Xen - Dev forum at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

Hi all, i have a xen 4.3 installation and would like to have a bridge bond szenario: *** eth0 eth1 | | bond0 | br0 | vif = [ ''bridge=br0,mac=xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx'' ] *** With the network script in debian wheezy *** /etc/network/interfaces auto bond0 iface bond0 inet manual slaves eth0 eth1

On 16/03/15 09:52, Olszewski, Raphael wrote: > > Due to security reasons smb signing has to be activated and this share > between linux and windows is now dead. > > And I do not find the correct settings to do a public share in this > szenario. > > It has to be public, because the linux is?nt allowed to join the > domain and on the other way, the win-clients cannot

Hi@all System: 2 Server nodes connected to a SAN storage (shared LUNs). Shared storage holds a Volume group (lvm2) with all my hvm guests. Live migration works nice. But snapshots from logical volumes only usable, when i first deactivate logical volume on the second node - otherwise errors in metadata came up and snapshot is broken/inconsistent. both xen 3.3 are installed on ubuntu 8.04. can

Szenario: UA(Grandstream) => PROXY(SER) => GATEWAY(*) => PSTN After sending the SIP ACK From Gateway (*) ACK sip:123456@127.0.0.1 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1;branch=z9hG4bK86c0bd474ea746b5 From: "Me" <sip:123456@mydomain.de>;tag=0f63d269bc25545d To: <sip:100@mydomain.de>;tag=as05df60b5 Contact: <sip:100@192.168.0.1> Call-ID: