Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "syscall_64".
Did you mean:
vsyscall_64
2019 Jun 03
2
[PATCH 22/22] docs: fix broken documentation links
Le 30/05/2019 ? 01:23, Mauro Carvalho Chehab a ?crit?:
> Mostly due to x86 and acpi conversion, several documentation
> links are still pointing to the old file. Fix them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung at kernel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/acpi/dsd/leds.txt | 2 +-
> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst | 6
2019 Jun 03
2
[PATCH 22/22] docs: fix broken documentation links
Le 30/05/2019 ? 01:23, Mauro Carvalho Chehab a ?crit?:
> Mostly due to x86 and acpi conversion, several documentation
> links are still pointing to the old file. Fix them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung at kernel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/acpi/dsd/leds.txt | 2 +-
> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst | 6
2019 Jun 04
0
[PATCH 22/22] docs: fix broken documentation links
...arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl
arch/parisc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
arch/sh/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl
arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
arch/xtensa/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
include/linux/syscalls.h
include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
kernel/sys_ni.c
mm/mprotect.c
tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl
tools/perf/arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
tools/perf/builtin-trace....
2007 Oct 31
5
[PATCH 0/7] (Re-)introducing pvops for x86_64 - Real pvops work part
Hey folks,
This is the part-of-pvops-implementation-that-is-not-exactly-a-merge. Neat,
uh? This is the majority of the work.
The first patch in the series does not really belong here. It was already
sent to lkml separetedly before, but I'm including it again, for a very
simple reason: Try to test the paravirt patches without it, and you'll fail
miserably ;-) (and it was not yet
2007 Oct 31
5
[PATCH 0/7] (Re-)introducing pvops for x86_64 - Real pvops work part
Hey folks,
This is the part-of-pvops-implementation-that-is-not-exactly-a-merge. Neat,
uh? This is the majority of the work.
The first patch in the series does not really belong here. It was already
sent to lkml separetedly before, but I'm including it again, for a very
simple reason: Try to test the paravirt patches without it, and you'll fail
miserably ;-) (and it was not yet