search for: sys_sendto

...NAME 6 /* sys_getsockname(2) */ -#define SYS_GETPEERNAME 7 /* sys_getpeername(2) */ -#define SYS_SOCKETPAIR 8 /* sys_socketpair(2) */ -#define SYS_SEND 9 /* sys_send(2) */ -#define SYS_RECV 10 /* sys_recv(2) */ -#define SYS_SENDTO 11 /* sys_sendto(2) */ -#define SYS_RECVFROM 12 /* sys_recvfrom(2) */ -#define SYS_SHUTDOWN 13 /* sys_shutdown(2) */ -#define SYS_SETSOCKOPT 14 /* sys_setsockopt(2) */ -#define SYS_GETSOCKOPT 15 /* sys_getsockopt(2) */ -#de...

...8a006>] SYSC_sendto+0x116/0x170 [59826.070019] [<ffffffff81287efc>] ? __alloc_fd+0x4c/0x1b0 [59826.070019] [<ffffffff810033c1>] ? syscall_trace_enter+0x201/0x2c0 [59826.070019] [<ffffffff8115b199>] ? __audit_syscall_exit+0x229/0x2b0 [59826.070019] [<ffffffff8178a06e>] SyS_sendto+0xe/0x10 [59826.070019] [<ffffffff81003e7a>] do_syscall_64+0x7a/0x240 [59826.070019] [<ffffffff8106f1a7>] ? do_page_fault+0x37/0x90 [59826.070019] [<ffffffff818d83eb>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 [59826.070019] Code: e8 36 41 39 c6 74 17 48 8b 4d b8 44 89 f2 44 89 fe 4c...

...[ 74.343677] netlink_sendmsg+0x2db/0x390 [ 74.343968] sock_sendmsg+0x33/0x40 [ 74.344233] SYSC_sendto+0xee/0x160 [ 74.344482] ? SYSC_bind+0xb0/0xe0 [ 74.344806] ? sock_alloc_file+0x92/0x110 [ 74.345106] ? fd_install+0x20/0x30 [ 74.345360] ? sock_map_fd+0x3f/0x60 [ 74.345586] SyS_sendto+0x9/0x10 [ 74.345790] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1a/0xa9 [ 74.346086] RIP: 0033:0x7fc70d1b8f6d [ 74.346312] RSP: 002b:00007fff4144a708 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c [ 74.346785] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007fc70d1b8f6d [ 74.347244] RDX: 00000000000...

...[ 74.343677] netlink_sendmsg+0x2db/0x390 [ 74.343968] sock_sendmsg+0x33/0x40 [ 74.344233] SYSC_sendto+0xee/0x160 [ 74.344482] ? SYSC_bind+0xb0/0xe0 [ 74.344806] ? sock_alloc_file+0x92/0x110 [ 74.345106] ? fd_install+0x20/0x30 [ 74.345360] ? sock_map_fd+0x3f/0x60 [ 74.345586] SyS_sendto+0x9/0x10 [ 74.345790] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1a/0xa9 [ 74.346086] RIP: 0033:0x7fc70d1b8f6d [ 74.346312] RSP: 002b:00007fff4144a708 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c [ 74.346785] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007fc70d1b8f6d [ 74.347244] RDX: 00000000000...

...om_user+0x17/0x5d Mar 29 09:38:24 pstn1 kernel: [<c04ea3a1>] copy_to_user+0x31/0x48 Mar 29 09:38:24 pstn1 kernel: [<f89ab141>] zt_chan_read+0x1e0/0x20b [zaptel] Mar 29 09:38:24 pstn1 kernel: [<c04ea195>] copy_from_user+0x31/0x5d Mar 29 09:38:24 pstn1 kernel: [<c05ac4c4>] sys_sendto+0x116/0x140 Mar 29 09:38:24 pstn1 kernel: [<c0415d4f>] flush_tlb_page+0x74/0x77 Mar 29 09:38:24 pstn1 kernel: [<c0461331>] do_wp_page+0x3bf/0x40a Mar 29 09:38:24 pstn1 kernel: [<c04284f1>] current_fs_time+0x4a/0x55 Mar 29 09:38:24 pstn1 kernel: [<c0488f9b>] touch_atime+0...

...4aeef>] ? handle_pte_fault+0x4af/0xb00 > <4> [<ffffffff81451f14>] ? move_addr_to_kernel+0x64/0x70 > <4> [<ffffffff814538b6>] __sys_sendmsg+0x406/0x420 > <4> [<ffffffff8104a98c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x1ec/0x480 > <4> [<ffffffff814523d9>] ? sys_sendto+0x139/0x190 > <4> [<ffffffff8103ea6c>] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1c/0x20 > <4> [<ffffffff81453ad9>] sys_sendmsg+0x49/0x90 > <4> [<ffffffff8100b072>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > <4>Code: 83 e0 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 48 03 93 d0 00 00 00 66 83 42 04 0...

...4aeef>] ? handle_pte_fault+0x4af/0xb00 > <4> [<ffffffff81451f14>] ? move_addr_to_kernel+0x64/0x70 > <4> [<ffffffff814538b6>] __sys_sendmsg+0x406/0x420 > <4> [<ffffffff8104a98c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x1ec/0x480 > <4> [<ffffffff814523d9>] ? sys_sendto+0x139/0x190 > <4> [<ffffffff8103ea6c>] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1c/0x20 > <4> [<ffffffff81453ad9>] sys_sendmsg+0x49/0x90 > <4> [<ffffffff8100b072>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > <4>Code: 83 e0 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 48 03 93 d0 00 00 00 66 83 42 04 0...

I had to add an explicit tag to suppress compiler warning: gcc isn't smart enough to notice that len is always initialized since function is called with size > 0. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> --- drivers/vhost/net.c | 15 ++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff

I had to add an explicit tag to suppress compiler warning: gcc isn't smart enough to notice that len is always initialized since function is called with size > 0. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> --- drivers/vhost/net.c | 15 ++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff

..._skb+0x213/0x450 > > [ 310.176166] rtnetlink_rcv+0x28/0x30 > > [ 310.176990] netlink_unicast+0x4a0/0x6c0 > > [ 310.177807] netlink_sendmsg+0x9ec/0xe50 > > [ 310.178646] sock_sendmsg+0xba/0xf0 > > [ 310.179435] SYSC_sendto+0x31d/0x620 > > [ 310.180229] SyS_sendto+0xe/0x10 > > [ 310.181004] do_syscall_64+0x235/0x5b0 > > [ 310.181783] return_from_SYSCALL_64+0x0/0x6a > > [ 310.182595] > > [ 310.183217] Freed by task 483: > > [ 310.183934] save_stack_trace+0x1b/0x20 > > [ 310.184801] save_stack+0x43/0xd0 > > [...

..._skb+0x213/0x450 > > [ 310.176166] rtnetlink_rcv+0x28/0x30 > > [ 310.176990] netlink_unicast+0x4a0/0x6c0 > > [ 310.177807] netlink_sendmsg+0x9ec/0xe50 > > [ 310.178646] sock_sendmsg+0xba/0xf0 > > [ 310.179435] SYSC_sendto+0x31d/0x620 > > [ 310.180229] SyS_sendto+0xe/0x10 > > [ 310.181004] do_syscall_64+0x235/0x5b0 > > [ 310.181783] return_from_SYSCALL_64+0x0/0x6a > > [ 310.182595] > > [ 310.183217] Freed by task 483: > > [ 310.183934] save_stack_trace+0x1b/0x20 > > [ 310.184801] save_stack+0x43/0xd0 > > [...

...ing_exit+0x1d/0x30 [ 37.438778] [<ffffffff8100367f>] ? enter_from_user_mode+0x1f/0x50 [ 37.438780] [<ffffffff8100377b>] ? syscall_trace_enter_phase1+0xcb/0x130 [ 37.438781] [<ffffffff81003017>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x17/0x19 [ 37.438784] [<ffffffff8170079e>] SyS_sendto+0xe/0x10 [ 37.438786] [<ffffffff8184be36>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attac...

...gt; [<ffffffff8114aeef>] ? handle_pte_fault+0x4af/0xb00 <4> [<ffffffff81451f14>] ? move_addr_to_kernel+0x64/0x70 <4> [<ffffffff814538b6>] __sys_sendmsg+0x406/0x420 <4> [<ffffffff8104a98c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x1ec/0x480 <4> [<ffffffff814523d9>] ? sys_sendto+0x139/0x190 <4> [<ffffffff8103ea6c>] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1c/0x20 <4> [<ffffffff81453ad9>] sys_sendmsg+0x49/0x90 <4> [<ffffffff8100b072>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b <4>Code: 83 e0 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 48 03 93 d0 00 00 00 66 83 42 04 01 8b 93 cc 00 00 00...

...gt; [<ffffffff8114aeef>] ? handle_pte_fault+0x4af/0xb00 <4> [<ffffffff81451f14>] ? move_addr_to_kernel+0x64/0x70 <4> [<ffffffff814538b6>] __sys_sendmsg+0x406/0x420 <4> [<ffffffff8104a98c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x1ec/0x480 <4> [<ffffffff814523d9>] ? sys_sendto+0x139/0x190 <4> [<ffffffff8103ea6c>] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1c/0x20 <4> [<ffffffff81453ad9>] sys_sendmsg+0x49/0x90 <4> [<ffffffff8100b072>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b <4>Code: 83 e0 00 00 00 00 10 00 00 48 03 93 d0 00 00 00 66 83 42 04 01 8b 93 cc 00 00 00...

...db/0x390 > [ 74.343968] sock_sendmsg+0x33/0x40 > [ 74.344233] SYSC_sendto+0xee/0x160 > [ 74.344482] ? SYSC_bind+0xb0/0xe0 > [ 74.344806] ? sock_alloc_file+0x92/0x110 > [ 74.345106] ? fd_install+0x20/0x30 > [ 74.345360] ? sock_map_fd+0x3f/0x60 > [ 74.345586] SyS_sendto+0x9/0x10 > [ 74.345790] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1a/0xa9 > [ 74.346086] RIP: 0033:0x7fc70d1b8f6d > [ 74.346312] RSP: 002b:00007fff4144a708 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c > [ 74.346785] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 00007fc70d1b8f6d > [ 74...

...localhost kernel: [<ffffffff80070b89>] init_fpu+0x62/0x7f Oct 14 16:25:09 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff8006beee>] math_state_restore+0x23/0x4c Oct 14 16:25:09 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff8005dde9>] error_exit+0x0/0x84 Oct 14 16:25:09 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff802264ac>] sys_sendto+0x11c/0x14f Oct 14 16:25:10 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff8006b011>] __switch_to+0xfe/0x22f Oct 14 16:25:10 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff80062ff8>] thread_return+0x62/0xfe Oct 14 16:25:10 localhost kernel: [<ffffffff80043b84>] sys_rt_sigreturn+0x323/0x356 Oct 14 16:25:10 localhost...

Hi, I try to build experimental networks with Xen and stumbled over the same problem that has been described quite well by Mark Doll in his posting "xen_net: Failed to connect all virtual interfaces: err=-100" here: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2005-04/msg00447.html As it was still present in 2.0.6, I tried 3.0-devel and found NR_PIRQS and NR_DYNIRQS had been

Hi, I try to build experimental networks with Xen and stumbled over the same problem that has been described quite well by Mark Doll in his posting "xen_net: Failed to connect all virtual interfaces: err=-100" here: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2005-04/msg00447.html As it was still present in 2.0.6, I tried 3.0-devel and found NR_PIRQS and NR_DYNIRQS had been