search for: synthesizing

Hi all, LLVM is smart that it can synthesize llvm.memset, llvm.memcpy etc. from loops, which can be lowered into calls to memset, memcpy and so on. Is there an option that can disable this optimization? For some cases, I do not want the code to depend on libc. Thanks in advance! Bin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:06:42PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > > Yeah, as much as I'd like to avoid adding a new option, I guess we > have to do something about it, my latest take on this is > > acl_xattr:default acl style = [posix|windows] > > This parameter determines the type of ACL that is > synthesized in case a file or

...This should be synthesizable from the > DebugLoc on the instruction in the asm printer, no need to redundantly > encode it into the comment field. Except the DebugLoc stuff isn't all there yet AFAIK. We've been using the comment mechanism for over a year. I agree we should move to synthesizing it from DebugLoc when it's ready. We're not going to submit our line number stuff anyway (it's too much of a hack) but we would like the comment infrastructure to be there. > > - Tag instructions as register spills or reloads. > > I'm not sure what this means exactly,...

On 7/30/2013 12:55 PM, Bin Tzeng wrote: > Hi all, > > LLVM is smart that it can synthesize llvm.memset, llvm.memcpy etc. from > loops, which can be lowered into calls to memset, memcpy and so on. Is > there an option that can disable this optimization? For some cases, I do > not want the code to depend on libc. You can use -fno-builtin, if that suits your needs. -K --

The output of the avx-hadd program is 3 11 7 15 Preston -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Duncan Sands Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:14 PM To: Bruno Cardoso Lopes Cc: LLVMdev Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Patch to synthesize x86 hadd instructions; need help with the tablegen bits Hi Bruno, > Some comments:

This patch synthesizes haddps/haddpd/hsubps/hsubpd instructions from floating point additions and subtractions of appropriate vector shuffles. To do this I introduced new x86 FHADD and FHSUB opcodes. These need to be wired up somehow in the .td file to the appropriate instructions. Since I have no idea how tablegen works I just hacked it in horribly. It works, but breaks support for the hadd

Hi Reed, I've been using Speex to transmit TTS for years. It works very well with no tweaking. I use Microsoft TTS ("Microsoft Mike") with Speex at 16kHz wideband and VBR quality 6. Sometimes I forget that the sound is even coming from another computer and being compressed+decompressed. If anything, TTS seems easier for Speex to deal with than real voice. But I don't

We are wholesale supplier of DJ equipment here in Taiwan.We have various model in stock such as Guitar,Amps/Effects,Bass,Drums,Keyboards,Live Sound in stock.interested buyers should contact us at the below address yangmiaofenggear at yahoo.com yangmiaofenggear at hotmail.com Pioneer DJM 909 ...................$500USD PIoneer DJM 700 ...................$450USD Pioneer DJM 800

On Sunday 12 July 2009 18:56, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Jul 10, 2009, at 3:05 PM, David Greene wrote: > > Here's the first of several patches to get comments into asm > > output. This one > > adds comment information to MachineInstructions and outputs it in the > > generated AsmPrinters. This includes TableGen work to trigger the > > comment > > output

Hi Duncan, On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > This patch synthesizes haddps/haddpd/hsubps/hsubpd instructions from > floating > point additions and subtractions of appropriate vector shuffles.  To do this > I > introduced new x86 FHADD and FHSUB opcodes.  These need to be wired up > somehow > in the .td file to the appropriate

On Jul 13, 2009, at 9:31 AM, David Greene wrote: >> A couple of things are important to discuss: >> >> + dynamic_cast<formatted_raw_ostream &>(O) << Comment(*c); >> >> We're trying to eliminate rtti, please don't add new uses of it. >> Switching all of the asmprinter to statically use >> formatted_raw_ostream would be

Hi, after ignoring this for too long (see [1]), I'm still struggling how to shut down servers fed by two independent UPS systems. Both are connected to NUT via the snmp-ups driver with mibs "huawei" and "netvision". However, I fear both do not feature the LB warning via ups.status. We can shut down all less important servers (conencted to a single UPS) via upssched

Hi all, On 5/19/23 15:11, Greg Troxel wrote: > LB is baked in to nut behavior. So if a UPS doesn't report LB, then > it makes sense to synthesize it. Synthetic LB is the cleanest fix at > the earlier processing point. I fully agree and thus this ought to be done in/near uspd IMHO. I glanced over the server/ directory and was not sure where even to begin hooking this

Hi Bruno, > Some comments: > > + // Try to synthesize horizontal adds from adds of shuffles. > + if (((Subtarget->hasSSE3()&& (VT == MVT::v4f32 || VT == MVT::v2f64)) || > + (Subtarget->hasAVX()&& (VT == MVT::v8f32 || VT == MVT::v4f64)))&& > + isHorizontalBinOp(LHS, RHS, true)) > > 1) You probably want to do something like: >

My $0.02: LB is baked in to nut behavior. So if a UPS doesn't report LB, then it makes sense to synthesize it. Synthetic LB is the cleanest fix at the earlier processing point. One could have a config that is basically synthetic-lowbatt-percent that generates LB if (as Jim says) on battery, not calibrating, and batt% <= that. One could have a similar config

Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin at USherbrooke.ca> hat am 1. Februar 2010 um 17:29 geschrieben: > Can you look at the residual signal? i.e. what it looks like after the pitch is > removed. Any significant difference there? Also, the pitch gain can be > informative. > I catched the "orignal" residual (st->exc from line 400 inside nb_celp.c) plus the

Hi Jean-Marc, I'm currently trying to analyze the LPC synthesis filter. For this, can you please tell me the exact format of the LPC coeffs (in variable interp_qlpc), please? cheers, Frank -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: "Frank Lorenz" <Frank_wtal at web.de> Gesendet: 02.02.10 11:00:16 An: jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca CC: speex-dev at xiph.org Betreff: Re:

Hi, Andras, Thanks for the comments. Yes, I am aware of those issues. I probably should have been more accurate on my usage of terms. Actually in my project, the unit collection is a mixture of diphones and words. However seems to me, these synthesizer specific issue is irrelevant to my question about speex. As you said, i merely use speex as storage methods. All I ask for is to get the

Hi all, I have a question about the types of MachineOperand. There are 12 different types of MachineOperand such as MO_Register, MO_Immediate and so on. Some of the names are self-explanatory such as MO_Register and MO_Immediate. Some of them are a little confusing such as MO_FrameIndex, MO_ConstantPoolIndex and so on. For example, what is the different between MO_ExternalSymbol and

Hello users, Actually i wanted to implement Text-To-Speech engine from cepstral voice using swift application i tried the documentation of doing this and i was unsuccessful at doing this work with asterisk can anybody please help me out finding the solution to installation thanks in advacnce srinivas Antarvedi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: