search for: syntas

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "syntas".

Did you mean: syntax
2012 Jul 11
0
[LLVMdev] A problem with inline assembly in llvmc for ARM
Looks like a problem with llvmc. Your example works fine with clang. ~/tmp $ cat foo.c void foo() { __asm__ volatile ("push {r4}\n\t"); } gilgamesh: ~/tmp $ clang -target arm-linux-eabi -S -Os foo.c -o - .syntax unified .eabi_attribute 20, 1 .eabi_attribute 21, 1 .eabi_attribute 23, 3 .eabi_attribute 24, 1 .eabi_attribute 25, 1 .file "foo.c" .text .globl foo
1998 May 18
1
Extra form feed on Samba printing
I am using samba to share my RedHat V5.0 printers to my MS Network clients, but I get an extra blank page at the end of each print job. I've looked at the printcap man pages, but haven't been successful in getting rid of the trailing blank page. Here's the printcap section for the printer I've been having problems with: # /etc/printcap parallel:\ :sd=/var/spool/lpd/lp2:\
2012 Jul 11
4
[LLVMdev] A problem with inline assembly in llvmc for ARM
Hi, I encountered an issue with inline assembly in my c files compiled with llvmc. When I have a push instruction in the inline assembly like: __asm__ volatile ( "push {r4}\n\t" ); the compiler will drop the curly braces and leave it in the generated assembly file as: push r4 And this is non-conformant with the ARM
2007 Aug 31
4
About "b" meaning "byte" and bit
...k at iproute2 sources, so I don''t know if this should be dealt with in iproute2 or in the kernel itself. Most of the kernel has switched to SI units already, and IMHO most of the utils should do the same, to avoid the endless problem of SI vs. binary units. This said, maybe this weird syntas is used in tc so third party apps can parse the output. These apps certainly will break if a change in the syntax is made, but otherwise I see no reason to keep using "b" instead of "B" and "bit" instead of "b". Currently the only way of having a sane syntax...