search for: syncronization

I have repeatable cases where a (very large) file contents are the intended content of a device (partition) of that exact size. The target device is already mostly of that content, but a few block have been changed. I want to restore the device contents back to what the file originally was. I'm trying to find a way to have rsync's write end open the device as a file and do its thing to

Hi everybody, I have been using rsync for quite some time, and I've realized it is a fantastic tool. As it is able to syncronize two CD images, I was wondering, if I could do that with a harddisk partition. Would it be possible to syncronize two partitions at device level somehow? I mean using: # rsync /dev/hda8 /dev/hda9 skipping non-regular file "hda8" where /dev/hda8

I spend time in two places, in different countries. I have a local network in each place, with IMAP servers on each network. I collect email by fetchmail from various servers, and read email on my laptop with KMail. I tried using just one IMAP server, but this proved impractical. So I have two collections of the same sub-folders, on the two servers. I have two questions: 1. Is there a simpler

i have several large .tar backup file on the server it's about 2 GB and 4 GB the question is, if i syncronize using rsync to other computer, rsync will re-transfer the whole 1 big file, or only transfer part of the file ? or maybe i should reduce the size, by splitting the file into 650 Mb each. or it's the same as if transfering via FTP ? thanks Luqman.H ---------------------

Dear friends we have the following problem. We have Operating system=OpenBsd installed computer and an other one with windows 98 when we change the password via smbpasswd myname ... then we have the following problem. My sambapassword is really changed. Since when I try to communicate samba server through windows 98 installed computer I see there is no problem. (Since we can see the shared

On 10/10/2015 13:22, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I spend time in two places, in different countries. > I have a local network in each place, > with IMAP servers on each network. > I collect email by fetchmail from various servers, > and read email on my laptop with KMail. > > I tried using just one IMAP server, but this proved impractical. > So I have two collections of the

Hi, I have 5 very identical server running xen 3.0.3 (Debian etch std. packages) with serveral DomUs. Theres my question: It is possible to keep thier lvm volume groups or singe logical volumes synchronized over network? Example: dom01 contains: domU1 on volume group xenserver1 with logical volume domU1 and LV domU1-swp domU2 on volume group xenserver1 with logical volume domU2 and LV

...ding the primary server from the offsite backups, how can I ensure that the winbind mapping is carried over to avoid the same problem as #1? I researched the list archives and saw mention that this was being worked on back in 2001. Has any progress been made and I just missed the release? If syncronization is still impossible, if I dump winbindd_idmap.tdb to my backup server, would restoring that be enough to get everything back to square 1? Thanks in advance. - -- - -Ron +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ "Yes Janet, life's pretty cheap to THAT type....

I am looking at possibility of using OCFS2 with an existing application that requires very high throughput for read and write file access. Files are created by single writer (process) and can be read by multiple reader, possibly while the file is being written. 100+ different files may be written simultaneously, and can be read by 1000+ readers. I am currently using XFS on a local filesystem,

There's a big thread about filesystems on postfix-users@postfix.org Could you shed some light on that issue? ----- Forwarded message from Wietse Venema <wietse@porcupine.org> ----- From: wietse@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 07:53:26 -0500 (EST) To: Lawrence Greenfield <leg+@andrew.cmu.edu> Cc: Wietse Venema <wietse@porcupine.org>,

...el: VPM400: Not Present Oct 20 15:20:55 redbox-ast16 kernel: VPM450: Not Present Oct 20 15:20:55 redbox-ast16 kernel: Completed startup! --- Now if I either start asterisk, or if I stop dahdi, it will panic: # /etc/init.d/dahdi stop Unloading DAHDI hardware modules: TE4XXP: Version Syncronization Error! TE4XXP: Version Syncronization Error! TE4XXP: Version Syncronization Error! TE4XXP: Version Syncronization Error! HARDWARE ERROR CPU 1: Machine Check Exception: 4 Bank 8: 00000000000000 TSC 0 This is not a software problem! Run through mcel...

The cause is, of course, that the tree being syncronized ie getting larger, so of course rsync is slowing down. But in the case of my particular file tree, there is a way it could be speeded up, but this would obviously also need a change in the rsync protocol to accomplish it. Any tree that has major unchanged subbranches would benefit from this. The file tree I'm syncronizing in this case

Am 29.08.2017 um 22:52 schrieb Leroy Tennison: > The AppPreloader is doing things (and probably confusing systemd in the process) but I didn't start that, it was a part of the reboot. I looked at /etc/init.d/puppetmaster to see if something strange was being done and it was one of the simpler init scripts I've seen, uses start-stop-daemon. > > I don't have any control over

Greetings, Has anyone had any success with samba-3.25[a-c] under solaris10 amd64 using 'unix password sync=yes' option? % smbpasswd Old SMB password: New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: machine 127.0.0.1 rejected the password change: Error was : RAP86: The specified password is invalid. Password changed for user sambatest debugging reveals the following condition: [2007/09/13

...(source IP: 192.168.177.5) Last Successful Sync Time: 10.08.2023 20:42:45 Source: ntp.tls.msk.ru,0x9 Poll Interval: 15 (32768s) All this is run with ntpsec now (on debian bookworm). Local NTP servers at different locations also syncronize with each other. There's no (zero) problems with time syncronization (or AD, or DNS, or GPO or anything else) across whole network. FWIW. /mjt

On 29 Aug 2017 17:58, "Leroy Tennison" <leroy at datavoiceint.com> wrote: The particular issue is with puppetmaster (which admittedly takes 4 minutes to actually start, setting TimeoutStartSec=300 in it's unit file stopped the false timeout report) but I have seen it one other time (don't remember the details). systemctl status puppetmaster ? puppetmaster.service - Puppet

Hi All I've installed Samba 2.0.3 and coudn't put "unix passowrd sync" to work. I set: passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*password:* %n\n *Re-enter*new*password:* %n\n*changed.* passwd chat debug = Yes unix password sync = Yes log level = 100 The password page says "The password for 'user' has been changed". In fact it has been

Hello, Here is the logic that I am trying to achieve. I have a User Model and the business rule is that user can accept maximum 5 friends requests. for this I have an accept method in User Model which looks similar to below code snippet def accept(friend) raise ArgumentError if self.friends.count >= MAX_FRIENDS_ALLOWED ... ... #code to add friend to friends list end As you

Hi, Plz, i have installed a Samba NT PDC Domain with XP Prof. and strangelly the machines are syncronizing with the Samba Server when the user Logoff of the domain. I've used the smb.conf below in others domains and XP clients have never synchronized before. I understand that i'm not using roaming profile, because the logon path is empty. The only difference in this domain is that

I'm not sure if this is supported or not, but I can't get it to work. I'm trying to get the smb password and the unix password to sync for mapped users. I have have 'unix password sync' turned on and I have the username mapping file set up. When I change a users password in windows (where the username is the same in windows and linux) the password changes just fine. When I