search for: synchronizable

Hi, I know this request is a a little off-topic but may be interesting for dovecot users (at least i hope!) Does anybody has already had an experience with a calendar sharing solution including a webcalendar and an outlook connector, "compatible" with dovecot ? Today, there are many projects aiming to be a "M$ Exchange Killer" (such as Zimbra, OBM, open-exchange, etc) but

i''m a rails nuby so i don''t know where to fix this in the activerecord module.... there is no such column in the sys.view.user_constraints. SELECT uc.index_name FROM user_constraints uc WHERE uc.constraint_type = ''P'' this prevents me from doing a rake test:functionals ...as in below.... C:\railsspace>c:\ruby186\ruby\bin\ruby c:\ruby186\ruby\bin\rake

...nstruction completes" provides the equivalent > of ARM/Power A-cumulativity, which can be thought of as transitivity > backwards in time. I couldn't make that leap. In particular, the manual's "Detailed Description" sections explicitly refer to program-order: Every synchronizable specified memory instruction (loads or stores or both) that occurs in the instruction stream before the SYNC instruction must reach a stage in the load/store datapath after which no instruction re-ordering is possible before any synchronizable specified memory instruction which occurs after...

...nstruction completes" provides the equivalent > of ARM/Power A-cumulativity, which can be thought of as transitivity > backwards in time. I couldn't make that leap. In particular, the manual's "Detailed Description" sections explicitly refer to program-order: Every synchronizable specified memory instruction (loads or stores or both) that occurs in the instruction stream before the SYNC instruction must reach a stage in the load/store datapath after which no instruction re-ordering is possible before any synchronizable specified memory instruction which occurs after...

...e elaborate on the technical differences and practical impact of whether choosing memory-based tables in MySQL or using memcached. I got this far on my own: It seems that MySQL uses the NDB engine for transaction-safe memory access in a cluster. the memory storage engine seems to be faster but not synchronizable by any means in a cluster. memcached seems to be ultimately fast but requires extra effort in your code. Who got experience on that? Best regards Peter

...the equivalent > > of ARM/Power A-cumulativity, which can be thought of as transitivity > > backwards in time. > > I couldn't make that leap. In particular, the manual's "Detailed > Description" sections explicitly refer to program-order: > > Every synchronizable specified memory instruction (loads or stores or > both) that occurs in the instruction stream before the SYNC > instruction must reach a stage in the load/store datapath after which > no instruction re-ordering is possible before any synchronizable > specified memory instructio...

On 01/14/2016 01:29 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > >> On 01/14/2016 12:34 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >>> >>> The WRC+addr+addr is OK because data dependencies are not required to be >>> transitive, in other words, they are not required to flow from one CPU to >>> another without the help of an explicit memory barrier. >> I don't see any

On 01/14/2016 01:29 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > >> On 01/14/2016 12:34 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >>> >>> The WRC+addr+addr is OK because data dependencies are not required to be >>> transitive, in other words, they are not required to flow from one CPU to >>> another without the help of an explicit memory barrier. >> I don't see any

Dear list members, This is a question is about building an R package under windows and cygwin. Please bear with me. I have a package in R that compiles well on my stationary computer (WINDOWS NT, R 1.8.1 and prior), and the resulting (package_version).zip file works well there. It contains an R script file and a C file. After installing tools to build the package on my laptop, the package